architecture-decision
Create an ADR documenting a technical decision: context, alternatives considered, consequences.
Brownfield audit — do existing artifacts actually work? Numbered migration plan. Unlike /project-stage-detect, checks compliance not existence.
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios --skill adopt --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios --skill adopt -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios --skill adopt -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios --skill adopt -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios --skill adopt -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios --skill adopt -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios --skill adopt -a windsurf -y
name: adopt description: "Brownfield audit — do existing artifacts actually work? Numbered migration plan. Unlike /project-stage-detect, checks compliance not existence." argument-hint: "[focus: full | gdds | adrs | stories | infra]" user-invocable: true allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Write, AskUserQuestion, Bash(bash "*/.claude/skills/adopt/../../hooks/yaml-helper.sh" resolve_config *), Bash(bash .claude/scripts/gdd-structure-check.sh *), Bash(bash .claude/scripts/migrate-v1-config.sh --dry-run*) model: sonnet
!`bash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../hooks/yaml-helper.sh" resolve_config --keys review_mode,automation,automation_always_ask,workflow`
Resolved above — use as-is. `/adopt` also inspects `project.yaml` and the legacy config files directly when reporting and writing migration state; that raw inspection is deliberate and separate from the resolved values above.
This skill audits an existing project's artifacts for **format compliance** with the template's skill pipeline, then produces a prioritised migration plan.
**This is not `/project-stage-detect`.** `/project-stage-detect` answers: *what exists?* `/adopt` answers: *will what exists actually work with the template's skills?*
A project can have GDDs, ADRs, and stories — and every format-sensitive skill will still fail silently or produce wrong results if those artifacts are in the wrong internal format.
**Output:** `docs/adoption-plan-[date].md` — a persistent, checkable migration plan.
**Argument modes:**
**Audit mode:** `$ARGUMENTS` (blank = `full`)
---
**Automation mode**: Resolve `modes.automation` (`project.local.yaml` → `project.yaml` → default `collaborative`). Every `AskUserQuestion` call follows `.claude/docs/automation-modes.md` (collaborative asks always · guided major-only · autonomous logs and proceeds; `automation_always_ask` categories always prompt).
**`workflow`** (per `.claude/docs/workflow-modes.md`). It scopes the Phase 2 audit and Phase 3 severity: `full` audits all doc types at full structure; `standard` audits only the required docs/sections (optional sections are informational, not gaps); `minimal` is a `design/game-brief.md` format check — GDDs/ADRs/UX are not expected. See Phase 2.
**Read `references/1-detect.md` now and follow it** — this phase's steps are in that file, not here. Read it again if the conversation was compacted or resumed during this phase.
**Read `references/2-format-audit.md` now and follow it** — this phase's steps are in that file, not here. Read it again if the conversation was compacted or resumed during this phase.
**Read `references/3-classify.md` now and follow it** — this phase's steps are in that file, not here. Read it again if the conversation was compacted or resumed during this phase.
**Read `references/4-migration-plan.md` now and follow it** — this phase's steps are in that file, not here. Read it again if the conversation was compacted or resumed during this phase.
**Read `references/5-summary.md` now and follow it** — this phase's steps are in that file, not here. Read it again if the conversation was compacted or resumed during this phase.
**Read `references/6-write.md` now and follow it** — this phase's steps are in that file, not here. Read it again if the conversation was compacted or resumed during this phase.
**Read `references/7-first-action.md` now and follow it** — this phase's steps are in that file, not here. Read it again if the conversation was compacted or resumed during this phase.
**Applies in `collaborative` mode (the default).** For `guided` and `autonomous` modes, see `.claude/docs/automation-modes.md` — the rules below describe what collaborative mode requires, not universal behavior.
1. **Read silently** — complete the full audit before presenting anything 2. **Show the summary first** — let the user see scope before asking to write 3. **Ask before writing** — always confirm before creating the adoption plan file 4. **Offer, don't force** — the plan is advisory; the user decides what to fix and when 5. **One action at a time** — after handing off the plan, offer one specific next step, not a list of six things to do simultaneously 6. **Never regenerate existing artifacts** — only fill gaps in what exists; do not rewrite GDDs, ADRs, or stories that already have content
Turn Claude Code into a full game dev studio — 49 AI agents, 72 workflow skills, and a complete coordination system mirroring real studio hierarchy.
Create an ADR documenting a technical decision: context, alternatives considered, consequences.
Traceability matrix mapping GDD requirements to ADRs. Finds gaps, cross-ADR conflicts, engine compatibility. PASS/CONCERNS/NOT…
Author the Art Bible — visual identity gating asset production. Run before /map-systems.
Audit assets against naming conventions, file size budgets, format standards. Finds orphaned assets, missing references.
Per-asset visual specs plus AI generation prompts from GDDs and character profiles. After the art bible.
Find balance outliers, broken progressions, degenerate strategies, economy imbalances in formulas and data. 'Check game balance'.
Use your assigned AgentMail inbox to read email tasks, explicitly send or reply, and check delivery. Provided automatically by…
Create a new Architecture Decision Record with sequential numbering and AgentDB registration