agent-browser
Browser automation using Vercel's agent-browser CLI. Use when you need to interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, or scrape data. Alternative to…
Report a Dex bug to the Dex team with zero homework — Dex investigates locally, builds a privacy-safe report, shows it to you (or auto-sends if you've chosen that), and tracks the ticket until it's fixed. Use when the user says "report this", "send this to the Dex team", "file
$ npx -y skills add davekilleen/Dex --skill feedback --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/feedbackContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Report a Dex bug to the Dex team with zero homework — Dex investigates locally, builds a privacy-safe report, shows it to you (or auto-sends if you've chosen that), and tracks the ticket until it's fixed. Use when the user says "report this", "send this to the Dex team", "file
name: feedback description: Report a Dex bug to the Dex team with zero homework — Dex investigates locally, builds a privacy-safe report, shows it to you (or auto-sends if you've chosen that), and tracks the ticket until it's fixed. Use when the user says "report this", "send this to the Dex team", "file feedback", "/feedback", asks "what happened to my bug report", or accepts Doctor's offer to report a Dex bug. Also use when the user describes something in Dex misbehaving in their own words, without asking for a report at all — "the meeting sync is doing something weird", "this keeps breaking", "X stopped working", "that's not what I asked for" — investigate first, then offer. Not for capturing ideas about your own vault or workflow; use the improvements backlog for those. Not for trouble in the user's own notes, calendar or projects, which is never a Dex defect.
Turn "something in Dex is broken" into a high-quality report on the Dex team's desk, with the user doing nothing but approving. Contract: `docs/feedback-loop-contract.md`.
1. **The conversation is never a source.** A report may contain ONLY the allowed ingredients: Dex version, feature/skill name, what happened vs what was expected (phrased as Dex mechanics), error text and stack traces (Dex's own code paths), machine-state facts (OS, host app, feature health — never config values or file contents), investigation findings as mechanisms and counts ("checked 5 lines, 0 had task identity" — never the lines themselves), and a note the user types. Nothing about the user's work, people, meetings, or personal life — even if it feels relevant. If a fact can't be phrased without private content, leave it out. 2. **File paths:** Dex's own code paths (like `core/utils/doctor.py`) are fine. Paths to the user's notes are not — describe the folder role instead ("a person page under the People folder"). 3. **Show-before-send is governed by the trust dial** (`feedback` → `review_mode` in `System/user-profile.yaml`):
The user may edit anything first.
"say 'show it' to see exactly what went."
files under `System/.dex/feedback/` means first report).
4. **Never send without the script.** All sends go through the client script so every attempt lands in the local receipt log (`System/.dex/feedback-log.jsonl`). 5. **Prefer the vault interpreter.** Resolve it once, then use `"$FEEDBACK_PYTHON"` for every `feedback_client.py` call (check, report, status, answer, and link). Bare `python3` is the fallback only when neither vault path is executable.
FEEDBACK_PYTHON="python3"
if [ -x "${CLAUDE_DIR:-}/.venv/bin/python" ]; then
FEEDBACK_PYTHON="$CLAUDE_DIR/.venv/bin/python"
elif [ -x "${VAULT_PATH:-}/.venv/bin/python" ]; then
FEEDBACK_PYTHON="$VAULT_PATH/.venv/bin/python"
fi0. **Preflight the connection first** — before investigating or drafting anything:
"$FEEDBACK_PYTHON" .claude/skills/feedback/scripts/feedback_client.py check --vault "$VAULT_PATH"
setup first (~30 seconds): open the connect page, sign in, create a code, and I'll link this terminal." Show the script's instructions, then run the `link` subcommand with their code using the same `"$FEEDBACK_PYTHON"` — do not switch to bare `python3` even if the printed example uses it. If they'd rather not link right now, offer to draft the report anyway and save it locally so nothing is lost — but never let them discover the missing link only after approving a draft. 1. **Establish the facts.** From the conversation and quick local checks:
whole (it contains only Dex code paths). Do not reconstruct one from memory. 2. **Investigate locally before sending** (this is what makes reports actionable). Debug like an engineer with full local access, then send the *mechanism*, not the data. Examples of good investigation findings:
Keep it to what you verified, with counts. Never quote vault content. 3. **Machine state.** Assemble a small `machine_state` object from cheap facts: `os` (from `uname -s`, lowercased), `host_app` (e.g. claude-code), and — when `System/.dex/smoke-last-run.json` or a recent Doctor report exists — a `features` map of health states (values like ok/off/broken only). Skip anything you can't check cheaply; an empty machine_state is fine. 4. **Write the draft** to a temp file (e.g. `/tmp/dex-feedback-draft.json`):
{
"dex_version": "<from package.json>",
"feature": "/process-meetings",
"summary": "<what happened vs expected>",
"error_trace": "<verbatim, optional>",
"machine_state": { "os": "darwin", "host_app": "claude-code" },
"investigation": "<mechanism findings, optional>",
"user_note": "<only if the user typed one>",
"review_mode": "<the user's dial setting>"
}The script adds the timestamp and
A personal operating system for your work. Strategic work management, meeting intelligence, relationship tracking, daily planning — all configured for your specific role.
Repo: davekilleen/Dex
Browser automation using Vercel's agent-browser CLI. Use when you need to interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, or scrape data. Alternative to…
Build applications where agents are first-class citizens. Use this skill when designing autonomous agents, creating MCP tools, implementing self-modifying…
This skill should be used when writing Ruby gems following Andrew Kane's proven patterns and philosophy. It applies when creating new Ruby gems, refactoring…
This skill should be used before implementing features, building components, or making changes. It guides exploring user intent, approaches, and design…
Capture solved problems as categorized documentation with YAML frontmatter for fast lookup
Expert guidance for creating, writing, and refining Claude Code Skills. Use when working with SKILL.md files, authoring new skills, improving existing skills,…