cad-adopt
Initialize .planning/ from a repo that already exists - PROJECT.md, REQUIREMENTS.md and a remaining-work ROADMAP.md derived from the code and the git history
Why is this code like this - a git-log chain over one file[:line], joined to the phase, task, decision, deviation and review record on disk
$ npx -y skills add crenshawdev/cadence --skill cad-why --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/cad-whyContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Why is this code like this - a git-log chain over one file[:line], joined to the phase, task, decision, deviation and review record on disk
name: cad-why description: "Why is this code like this - a git-log chain over one file[:line], joined to the phase, task, decision, deviation and review record on disk" argument-hint: "<path>[:<line>]" allowed-tools: - Bash
<objective> Answer "why is this code like this" from the record already on disk, at one file and line. Read-only: no write, no dispatch, no summarization - the seam does the whole join and this skill relays what it returns. </objective>
<process> 1. Run the seam with the query as ONE single-quoted literal word: `node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/cadence-core/bin/why.mjs" '<path>[:<line>]' --dir .` Single quotes, never double: `$ARGUMENTS` is caller-supplied, and a double-quoted `$(...)` or backtick inside it runs before Node starts. A query containing a single quote is refused here, never escaped. Parse the one JSON line it prints. 2. `ok:false` - state the `reason` and `detail` fields plainly and stop. 3. `ok:true` - print the `text` field VERBATIM and nothing else: no summary before it, no commentary after it, no reformatting. `text` is already the whole answer, quoted from the record in its own words - reformatting it here would make the byte-identity a reader can check against the seam's own output false. </process>
Appearance is cheap. Verification is the work. Cadence is for developers using Claude Code on software they will still own after the session ends. Claude can write a convincing plan, produce working code, and tell you the job is finished.
Repo: crenshawdev/cadence
Initialize .planning/ from a repo that already exists - PROJECT.md, REQUIREMENTS.md and a remaining-work ROADMAP.md derived from the code and the git history
Internal role contract, preloaded into every cad-assumptions-analyzer rung agent. Not a user command.
Pre-ship traceability audit - every requirement traced to a phase, plan and verification, orphan detection both directions, a FAIL gate before shipping
Capture a phase-linked todo, a seed idea for a future milestone, or a note, without losing your place - .planning/CAPTURE.md, or --cadence for friction with…
Configure Cadence's config.json - workflow toggles, the per-role model and effort interview, and interactive cross-model review provider setup
Gather phase context before planning - codebase assumptions, locked decisions, falsifiable acceptance criteria - in one pass