/legal-contract-negotiation-review

Analyze counterparty contract changes against agreement/schedules, flag conflicts, and produce severity-rated counterpositions.

Boost this skill

cowork-os@cowork-os

GitHub

From plugin

cowork-os

452155 skills

Install

$ npx -y skills add CoWork-OS/CoWork-OS --skill legal-contract-negotiation-review --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
Slash command/legal-contract-negotiation-review

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Analyze counterparty contract changes against agreement/schedules, flag conflicts, and produce severity-rated counterpositions.

SKILL.md

legal-contract-negotiation-review.SKILL.md

name: legal-contract-negotiation-review
description: "Analyze counterparty contract changes against agreement/schedules, flag conflicts, and produce severity-rated counterpositions."
version: "1.0.0"
metadata:
  author: CoWork OS Contributors <info@coworkosapp.com>

Legal Contract Negotiation Review

Purpose

Analyze counterparty contract changes against agreement/schedules, flag conflicts, and produce severity-rated counterpositions.

Routing

Use when: Use for contract markups, last-minute deal term demands, or clause-by-clause negotiation defense work.
Do not use when: Do not use for pure legal research questions that do not require document comparison.
Outputs: Clause matrix, severity-ranked recommendations, counter-language, and a written negotiation brief.
Success criteria: Finds cross-document conflicts, produces actionable counterpositions, and writes the report artifact.

Trigger Examples

Positive

Use the legal-contract-negotiation-review skill for this request.
Help me with legal contract negotiation review.
Use for contract markups, last-minute deal term demands, or clause-by-clause negotiation defense work.
Legal Contract Negotiation Review: provide an actionable result.

Negative

Do not use for pure legal research questions that do not require document comparison.
Do not use legal-contract-negotiation-review for unrelated requests.
This request is outside legal contract negotiation review scope.
This is conceptual discussion only; no tool workflow is needed.

Parameters

| Name | Type | Required | Description | |---|---|---|---| | agreement_path | string | No | Optional explicit path to the main agreement (DOCX/PDF/TXT) | | disclosure_schedules_path | string | No | Optional explicit path to disclosure schedules or side letter | | counterparty_changes_path | string | No | Optional explicit path to counterparty redline or demand letter | | client_side | select | No | Which side you represent | | output_report_path | string | No | Where to write the negotiation analysis markdown | | output_docx_path | string | No | Optional path for a clean revised DOCX draft |