comment-checker
Use when Codex needs to understand or respond to automatic comment-checker feedback emitted after an edit-like PostToolUse hook.
Contribute a verified bug fix for LazyCodex, lazycodex-ai, omo-codex, bundled Codex skills, or upstream Codex CLI bugs. Opens a fork PR only for upstream openai/codex; LazyCodex-owned defects become a verified-fix issue on code-yeongyu/lazycodex (never a PR — that repo is a
$ npx -y skills add code-yeongyu/oh-my-opencode --skill lcx-contribute-bug-fix --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/lcx-contribute-bug-fixContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Contribute a verified bug fix for LazyCodex, lazycodex-ai, omo-codex, bundled Codex skills, or upstream Codex CLI bugs. Opens a fork PR only for upstream openai/codex; LazyCodex-owned defects become a verified-fix issue on code-yeongyu/lazycodex (never a PR — that repo is a
name: lcx-contribute-bug-fix description: "Contribute a verified bug fix for LazyCodex, lazycodex-ai, omo-codex, bundled Codex skills, or upstream Codex CLI bugs. Opens a fork PR only for upstream openai/codex; LazyCodex-owned defects become a verified-fix issue on code-yeongyu/lazycodex (never a PR — that repo is a generated distribution mirror). Use when the user asks to fix a bug, contribute a bug fix, contribute to fix bug, open a PR for a bug, or debug and PR a LazyCodex/Codex defect." metadata: short-description: Contribute verified LazyCodex or Codex bug fixes
Use this skill to debug a concrete LazyCodex or Codex defect, implement the smallest correct fix in a fresh temporary workspace, and deliver it. Work in English, keep the body short, and support every claim with runtime or source evidence.
Route ownership the same way as `$lcx-report-bug`, but the deliverable differs by target:
For `openai/codex`, create a fork PR that includes:
For `code-yeongyu/lazycodex`, create an issue (never a PR) that includes:
1. Read the user's bug report and identify the affected surface. 2. Invoke `$omo:debugging` for the investigation. If only unqualified skill names are exposed, invoke `$debugging` and state that it is the OMO debugging skill. 3. Materialize the latest sources under `LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT="${LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT:-${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/lazycodex-sources}"`, then decide the target repository. Sync both checkouts on every run and compare them before choosing. Validate cached checkouts before reuse so an incomplete `.git` directory cannot route the fix to the wrong repo:
LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT="${LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT:-${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/lazycodex-sources}"
mkdir -p "$LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT"
valid_source_checkout() {
DEST="$1"
git -C "$DEST" rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree >/dev/null 2>&1 &&
git -C "$DEST" config --get remote.origin.url >/dev/null 2>&1
}
recover_corrupt_source_checkout() {
DEST="$1"
if [ -e "$DEST" ] && ! valid_source_checkout "$DEST"; then
QUARANTINED="$DEST.corrupt.$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S)"
mv "$DEST" "$QUARANTINED"
echo "Moved corrupt source cache $DEST to $QUARANTINED" >&2
fi
}
sync_latest_source() {
REPO="$1"; DEST="$2"
recover_corrupt_source_checkout "$DEST"
if [ ! -d "$DEST" ]; then
gh repo clone "$REPO" "$DEST" -- --depth=1 \
|| git clone --depth=1 "https://github.com/$REPO" "$DEST"
fi
if ! valid_source_checkout "$DEST"; then
echo "Source cache $DEST is not a usable git checkout after clone" >&2
return 1
fi
git -C "$DEST" remote set-url origin "https://github.com/$REPO.git" >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
DEFAULT_BRANCH="$(git -C "$DEST" remote show origin | sed -n '/HEAD branch/s/.*: //p')"
if [ -z "$DEFAULT_BRANCH" ]; then
DEFAULT_BRANCH="$(git -C "$DEST" symbolic-ref --short refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's#^origin/##')"
fi
if [ -z "$DEFAULT_BRANCH" ]; then
echo "Could not determine default branch for $REPO in $DEST" >&2
return 1
fi
git -C "$DEST" fetch --depth=1 origin "$DEFAULT_BRANCH"
git -C "$DEST" checkout -B "$DEFAULT_BRANCH" FETCH_HEAD
}
sync_latest_source code-yeongyu/lazycodex "$LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT/lazycodex-source"
sync_latest_source openai/codex "$LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT/openai-codex-source"4. Create a fresh temporary clone and branch under `${TMPDIR:-/tmp}`. Do not modify the user's current repository for the target fix unless the current repository is itself the requested target and the user explicitly asked for local edits.
TARGET_REPO="code-yeongyu/lazycodex" # or openai/codex
WORK_ROOT="$(mktemp -d "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/lazycodex-fix-XXXXXX")"
gh repo clone "$TARGET_REPO" "$WORK_ROOT/repo" -- --depth=1
cd "$WORK_ROOT/repo"
BASE_BRANCH="$(git remote show origin | sed -n '/HEAD branch/s/.*: //p')"
git fetch origin "$BASE_BRANCH" --depth=1
BRANCH_NAME="lazycodex/bug-fix-<short-slug>"
git worktree add "$WORK_ROOT/worktree" -b "$BRANCH_NAME" "origin/$BASE_BRANCH"
cd "$WORK_ROOT/worktree"If `gh` cannot clone, use `git clone --depth=1 "https://github.com/$TARGET_REPO" "$WORK_ROOT/repo"` and continue with the same worktree flow.
5. Reproduce the bug in the worktree through the real surface. Save exact command output to `${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/lazycodex-fix-<short-slug>-repro.log`. 6. Write or update a failing regression test before production changes. Confirm it fails for the bug, not for a missing fixture or typo. 7. Implement the smallest correct fix. Avoid refactors unless the fix cannot be made safely without one. 8. Run the regression test, adjacent tests, and the smallest real-surface QA command that proves the user-visible behavior change
You're juggling Claude Code, Codex, and random OSS models. Configuring workflows. Debugging agents. We did the work. Tested everything. Kept what actually shipped. Install oh-my-openagent. Type ultrawork. Done.
Repo: code-yeongyu/oh-my-opencode
Use when Codex needs to understand or respond to automatic comment-checker feedback emitted after an edit-like PostToolUse hook.
Diagnose LazyCodex and Codex CLI installation health against the latest sources. Use whenever the user asks for a doctor or health check, says LazyCodex,…
Create a high-signal bug issue or PR in the repo that owns the defect. Use this whenever the user asks to report, file, open, or triage a LazyCodex,…
Use when Codex needs language-server diagnostics, definitions, references, symbols, or rename safety checks in the current workspace.
Use when the user asks about Codex Rules behavior, injected project rules, supported rule file locations, matching, or environment configuration.
Codex-only team orchestration: run a named team of cooperating Codex workers with durable, script-managed state. MUST USE when the user asks Codex to create,…