Skip to content
Productivity
Skill

/product-sense

Structured product sense/design framework for AI product roles. Covers: design a product, improve X, productize a capability.

From plugin
aroyburman-codes-pm-skills
2517 skills
Install
$ npx -y skills add aroyburman-codes/pm-skills --skill product-sense --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/product-sense

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Structured product sense/design framework for AI product roles. Covers: design a product, improve X, productize a capability.

SKILL.md

product-sense.SKILL.md
name: product-sense
description: "Structured product sense/design framework for AI product roles. Covers: design a product, improve X, productize a capability."
argument-hint: "[interview question]"

Product Sense Skill

Apply a structured framework to PM product sense / product design questions targeting AI product roles.

When to Use

  • User asks a "Design a product for X" question
  • User asks "How would you improve X"
  • User asks "How would you productize X capability"
  • User says `/product-sense` followed by a question
  • Any product design, product sense, or "build a product" interview question

Context

  • **Tuned for**: AI product roles at frontier AI companies
  • **What matters**: First-principles thinking, ambition, structured clarity, and taste
  • **Common pitfall**: Rushing to solutions without clarifying the problem first. Always start with clarifying questions.

Framework: Product Sense (6 Sections)

Generate the answer following this EXACT structure. Each section should be substantive - not just headers.

Section 1: Clarifications (ASK FIRST, ALWAYS)

Ask 3-5 clarifying questions before proceeding. Categories:

  • **Scope**: What company are we? What's the form factor? Platform constraints?
  • **Users**: Who is the primary audience? B2C vs B2B vs B2B2C?
  • **Business**: What stage is the company? Revenue model? Strategic priorities?
  • **Technical**: What capabilities exist? What's feasible in the timeframe?
  • **Constraints**: Budget, timeline, regulatory, geographic?

After listing questions, state reasonable assumptions for each and proceed.

Section 2: Product Strategy & Rationale (WHY BUILD THIS)

  • **Company Mission**: How does this align with the company's stated mission? Reference the specific company's mission statement and connect your product thinking to it.
  • **Trends & Tailwinds**: What macro trends make this timely? (AI adoption curves, regulatory shifts, user behavior changes)
  • **Competition**: Who else is doing this? What's the gap?
  • **Strategic Moat**: What unique advantage does this company have here?
  • **Product Goal**: One sentence on what we're building and why NOW

Section 3: User Segmentation (WHO)

Segment users along 3 dimensions and pick a primary:

  • **Reach**: How many potential users in each segment?
  • **Frequency**: How often would they use this?
  • **Underserved**: How poorly served are they today?

For each segment provide: persona name, description, why they'd use this, current alternatives.

**Pick primary segment** with clear rationale (usually: highest frequency + most underserved).

Section 4: User Journey & Pain Points (WHAT HURTS)

Map the user journey for the primary segment: 1. Discovery/Awareness 2. Onboarding/First Use 3. Core Usage Loop 4. Retention/Return

For each stage, identify pain points scored on:

  • **Severity** (1-3): How painful is this?
  • **Frequency** (1-3): How often does it occur?
  • **Alternatives** (1-3): How well do current solutions address this?

**Pick top 2-3 pain points** to solve. Justify the prioritization.

Section 5: Solutions (HOW)

For each selected pain point:

**Brainstorm** (3-4 options per pain point, range from incremental to ambitious)

**Evaluate** each on:

  • Impact on pain point (High/Med/Low)
  • Engineering effort (High/Med/Low)
  • Strategic alignment (High/Med/Low)
  • Differentiation (High/Med/Low)

**Recommend** top solution with clear rationale. Describe:

  • What the user sees/experiences (be concrete and specific)
  • Key features for V1 vs V2
  • Why this is better than alternatives

Section 6: Success Metrics

  • **North Star Metric**: One metric that captures the core value delivered
  • **Supporting Metrics** (3-4): Leading indicators that the NSM will grow
  • **Counter/Guardrail Metrics** (2-3): What we must NOT break (safety, quality, trust)
  • **How to measure**: What instrumentation is needed?

AI Company Flavor

When the question is about an AI company product, layer in:

  • **Safety considerations**: How does this product avoid harm? What guardrails exist?
  • **Model capabilities**: What model capabilities enable this? What's the technical frontier?
  • **Scaling dynamics**: How does this get better with more users/data?
  • **Mission alignment**: Tie back to the specific company's mission
  • **Taste**: Match the company's culture — some labs value ambitious, creative, step-change thinking; others value careful, principled, safety-first thinking; others value scientific rigor. Research the specific company's values beforehand.

Output Format

Structure the response as a conversational walkthrough — structured but natural. Use the section headers. Aim for ~2500 words total. Flag where you'd pause for discussion or input.

Research-First Workflow

Before generating the answer: 1. **Research** — Use web search to find latest thinking from AI company blogs, PM thought leaders, market data, competitor intel. Do 5-10 searches. 2. **Cite sources** — Include `[linked source](url)` inline for major claims, data points, and trends. 3. **Display** the complete structured answer.

What Good Looks Like

  • Starts with clarifying questions (CRITICAL)
  • Shows strategic thinking before jumping to solutions
  • User empathy is specific and grounded (not generic)
  • Solutions are creative AND feasible
  • Metrics are specific and tied to user value
  • Mentions trade-offs and what you'd NOT build
  • Ties back to company mission
  • Shows taste and opinion (not just framework execution)
Read more
Ships witharoyburman-codes-pm-skills

Structured frameworks for AI product managers — covering daily workflows, product thinking, and technical depth.

Get the whole plugin
Stats
25
Stars
1
Forks
Quiet
Maintenance
MIT
License
7mo ago
Last commit
7mo ago
Created

Repo: aroyburman-codes/pm-skills