accessibility
Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA. Use when building or auditing UI that must meet WCAG 2.2 Level AA, or when…
Fact-forcing gate that blocks Edit/Write/Bash (including MultiEdit) and demands concrete investigation (importers, data schemas, user instruction) before allowing the action. Measurably improves output quality by +2.25 points vs ungated agents.
$ npx -y skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill gateguard --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/gateguardContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Fact-forcing gate that blocks Edit/Write/Bash (including MultiEdit) and demands concrete investigation (importers, data schemas, user instruction) before allowing the action. Measurably improves output quality by +2.25 points vs ungated agents.
name: gateguard description: Fact-forcing gate that blocks Edit/Write/Bash (including MultiEdit) and demands concrete investigation (importers, data schemas, user instruction) before allowing the action. Measurably improves output quality by +2.25 points vs ungated agents. metadata: origin: community
A PreToolUse hook that forces Claude to investigate before editing. Instead of self-evaluation ("are you sure?"), it demands concrete facts. The act of investigation creates awareness that self-evaluation never did.
LLM self-evaluation doesn't work. Ask "did you violate any policies?" and the answer is always "no." This is verified experimentally.
But asking "list every file that imports this module" forces the LLM to run Grep and Read. The investigation itself creates context that changes the output.
**Three-stage gate:**
1. DENY — block the first Edit/Write/Bash attempt 2. FORCE — tell the model exactly which facts to gather 3. ALLOW — permit retry after facts are presented
No competitor does all three. Most stop at deny.
Two independent A/B tests, identical agents, same task:
| Task | Gated | Ungated | Gap | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Analytics module | 8.0/10 | 6.5/10 | +1.5 | | Webhook validator | 10.0/10 | 7.0/10 | +3.0 | | **Average** | **9.0** | **6.75** | **+2.25** |
Both agents produce code that runs and passes tests. The difference is design depth.
MultiEdit is handled identically — each file in the batch is gated individually.
Before editing {file_path}, present these facts:
1. List ALL files that import/require this file (search the tree — Glob/Grep, or find/grep via Bash)
2. List the public functions/classes affected by this change
3. If this file reads/writes data files, show field names, structure,
and date format (use redacted or synthetic values, not raw production data)
4. Quote the user's current instruction verbatimBefore creating {file_path}, present these facts:
1. Name the file(s) and line(s) that will call this new file
2. Confirm no existing file serves the same purpose (search the tree — Glob/Grep, or find/grep via Bash)
3. If this file reads/writes data files, show field names, structure,
and date format (use redacted or synthetic values, not raw production data)
4. Quote the user's current instruction verbatimTriggers on: `rm -rf`, `git reset --hard`, `git push --force`, `drop table`, etc.
1. List all files/data this command will modify or delete 2. Write a one-line rollback procedure 3. Quote the user's current instruction verbatim
1. The current user request in one sentence 2. What this specific command verifies or produces
The hook at `scripts/hooks/gateguard-fact-force.js` is included in this plugin. Enable it via hooks.json.
If GateGuard blocks setup or repair work, start the session with `ECC_GATEGUARD=off`. For hook-level control, keep using `ECC_DISABLED_HOOKS` with the GateGuard hook ID.
In long sessions, only the first `GATEGUARD_FACT_FORCE_FULL_DENIALS` fact-force denials (default 3) emit the full four-fact block; later denials are condensed to a single line carrying the denial ordinal, so near-identical blocks cannot accumulate in the context window and amplify model repetition loops (#2142). Retrying the same file or command after presenting facts never re-triggers the gate.
`ECC_GATEGUARD=off` (or `GATEGUARD_DISABLED=1`) turns the gate off entirely. The variables in this table do **not** — each narrows one behaviour while the load-bearing destructive-Bash checks keep running:
| Variable | Default | Effect | |---|---|---| | `GATEGUARD_BASH_ROUTINE_DISABLED` | unset (gate on) | Disables the **routine-Bash** gate only. The destructive-Bash gate (`rm -rf`, `git reset --hard`, `drop table`, `dd if=`, …) is unaffected. | | `GATEGUARD_EXEMPT_GLOBS` | unset (no exemptions) | Comma-separated globs; a matching Edit/Write/MultiEdit target skips first-touch fact-forcing. Intended for low-import-value trees (tests, generated artifacts, scratch dirs) where "who imports this / what schema" carries no signal. | | `GATEGUARD_FACT_FORCE_FULL_DENIALS` | `3` | How many denials emit the full four-fact block before later ones condense to a single line. `0` condenses from the very first denial. | | `GATEGUARD_BASH_EXTRA_DESTRUCTIVE` | unset | Extra destructive-command patterns, as regex source, added to the built-in set. A malformed regex is treated as unset (built-ins still apply) and logged once to stderr. | | `GATEGUARD_STATE_DIR` | `~/.gateguard` | Where per-session gate state is kept. If state cannot be persisted the gate allows the operation rather than looping, and names this variable in the warning. |
`GATEGUARD_BASH_ROUTINE_DISABLED` accepts `1`, `true`, `on`, `enabled`, `enable`, or `yes` (case- and whitespace-insensitive); any other value leaves the gate on.
| Variable | Effect | |---|---| | `ECC_GATEGUARD=off` | Disables GateGuard for the session. Accepts `0`, `false`, `off`, `disabled`, or `disable`. | | `GATEGUARD_DISABLED=1` | Same effect. Recognises `1` only — the spellings above do **not** apply here. |
For hook-level control, keep using `ECC_DISABLED_HOOKS` with the GateGuard hook ID.
Patterns match the entire project-relative target path. The
Your agent can write code, but ECC gives it a coordinated engineering system and toolbox: it plans before it builds, verifies changes with tests, reviews its own work from a fresh context, remembers what matters, and turns repeated wins into reusable skills
Repo: affaan-m/ECC
Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA. Use when building or auditing UI that must meet WCAG 2.2 Level AA, or when…
Full-stack diagnostic for agent and LLM applications. Audits the 12-layer agent stack for wrapper regression, memory pollution, tool discipline failures,…
Head-to-head comparison of coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on custom tasks with pass rate, cost, time, and consistency metrics. Use when…
Design and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates. Use when defining or revising an agent's…
Structured self-debugging workflow for AI agent failures using capture, diagnosis, contained recovery, and introspection reports. Use when an agent run fails…
Add x402 payment execution to AI agents with per-task budgets, spending controls, and non-custodial wallets. Supports Base through agentwallet-sdk and X Layer…