/click-path-audit
Trace every user-facing button/touchpoint through its full state change sequence to find bugs where functions individually work but cancel each other out, produce wrong final state, or leave the UI in an inconsistent state. Use when: systematic debugging found no bugs but users
$ npx -y skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill click-path-audit --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/click-path-audit
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Trace every user-facing button/touchpoint through its full state change sequence to find bugs where functions individually work but cancel each other out, produce wrong final state, or leave the UI in an inconsistent state. Use when: systematic debugging found no bugs but users
SKILL.md
click-path-audit.SKILL.mdname: click-path-audit
description: "Trace every user-facing button/touchpoint through its full state change sequence to find bugs where functions individually work but cancel each other out, produce wrong final state, or leave the UI in an inconsistent state. Use when: systematic debugging found no bugs but users report broken buttons, or after any major refactor touching shared state stores."
metadata:
origin: community
/click-path-audit — Behavioural Flow Audit
Find bugs that static code reading misses: state interaction side effects, race conditions between sequential calls, and handlers that silently undo each other.
The Problem This Solves
Traditional debugging checks:
- Does the function exist? (missing wiring)
- Does it crash? (runtime errors)
- Does it return the right type? (data flow)
But it does NOT check:
- **Does the final UI state match what the button label promises?**
- **Does function B silently undo what function A just did?**
- **Does shared state (Zustand/Redux/context) have side effects that cancel the intended action?**
Real example: A "New Email" button called `setComposeMode(true)` then `selectThread(null)`. Both worked individually. But `selectThread` had a side effect resetting `composeMode: false`. The button did nothing. 54 bugs were found by systematic debugging — this one was missed.
---
How It Works
For EVERY interactive touchpoint in the target area:
1. IDENTIFY the handler (onClick, onSubmit, onChange, etc.)
2. TRACE every function call in the handler, IN ORDER
3. For EACH function call:
a. What state does it READ?
b. What state does it WRITE?
c. Does it have SIDE EFFECTS on shared state?
d. Does it reset/clear any state as a side effect?
4. CHECK: Does any later call UNDO a state change from an earlier call?
5. CHECK: Is the FINAL state what the user expects from the button label?
6. CHECK: Are there race conditions (async calls that resolve in wrong order)?
---
Execution Steps
Step 1: Map State Stores
Before auditing any touchpoint, build a side-effect map of every state store action:
For each Zustand store / React context in scope:
For each action/setter:
- What fields does it set?
- Does it RESET other fields as a side effect?
- Document: actionName → {sets: [...], resets: [...]}This is the critical reference. The "New Email" bug was invisible without knowing that `selectThread` resets `composeMode`.
**Output format:**
STORE: emailStore
setComposeMode(bool) → sets: {composeMode}
selectThread(thread|null) → sets: {selectedThread, selectedThreadId, messages, drafts, selectedDraft, summary} RESETS: {composeMode: false, composeData: null, redraftOpen: false}
setDraftGenerating(bool) → sets: {draftGenerating}
...
DANGEROUS RESETS (actions that clear state they don't own):
selectThread → resets composeMode (owned by setComposeMode)
reset → resets everythingStep 2: Audit Each Touchpoint
For each button/toggle/form submit in the target area:
TOUCHPOINT: [Button label] in [Component:line]
HANDLER: onClick → {
call 1: functionA() → sets {X: true}
call 2: functionB() → sets {Y: null} RESETS {X: false} ← CONFLICT
}
EXPECTED: User sees [description of what button label promises]
ACTUAL: X is false because functionB reset it
VERDICT: BUG — [description]**Check each of these bug patterns:**
Pattern 1: Sequential Undo
handler() {
setState_A(true) // sets X = true
setState_B(null) // side effect: resets X = false
}
// Result: X is false. First call was pointless.Pattern 2: Async Race
handler() {
fetchA().then(() => setState({ loading: false }))
fetchB().then(() => setState({ loading: true }))
}
// Result: final loading state depends on which resolves firstPattern 3: Stale Closure
const [count, setCount] = useState(0)
const handler = useCallback(() => {
setCount(count + 1) // captures stale count
setCount(count + 1) // same stale count — increments by 1, not 2
}, [count])Pattern 4: Missing State Transition
// Button says "Save" but handler only validates, never actually saves
// Button says "Delete" but handler sets a flag without calling the API
// Button says "Send" but the API endpoint is removed/broken
Pattern 5: Conditional Dead Path
handler() {
if (someState) { // someState is ALWAYS false at this point
doTheActualThing() // never reached
}
}Pattern 6: useEffect Interference
// Button sets stateX = true
// A useEffect watches stateX and resets it to false
// User sees nothing happen
Step 3: Report
For each bug found:
CLICK-PATH-NNN: [severity: CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]
Touchpoint: [Button label] in [file:line]
Pattern: [Sequential Undo / Async Race / Stale Closure / Missing Transition / Dead Path / useEffect Interference]
Handler: [function name or inline]
Trace:
1. [call] → sets {field: value}
2. [call] → RESETS {field: value} ← CONFLICT
Expected: [what user expects]
Actual: [what actually happens]
Fix: [specific fix]---
Scope Control
This audit is expensive. Scope it appropriately:
- **Full app audit:** Use when launching or after major refactor. Launch parallel agents per page.
- **Single page audit:** Use after building a new page or after a user reports a broken button.
- **Store-focused audit:** Use after modifying a Zustand store — audit all consumers of the changed actions.
Recommended agent split for full app:
Agent 1: Map ALL state stores (Step 1) — this is shared context for all other agents
Agent 2: Dashboard (Tasks, Notes, Journal, Ideas)
Agent 3: Chat (DanteChatColumn, JustChatPage)
Agent 4: Emails (ThreadList, DraftArea, EmailsPage)
Agent 5: Projects (ProjectsPage, ProjectOverviewTab, NewProjectWizard)
Agent 6: CRM (all sub-tabs)
Agent 7: Profile, Settings, Vault, Notifications
Agent 8: Management Suite (all pages)
Agent
Read more
name: click-path-audit description: "Trace every user-facing button/touchpoint through its full state change sequence to find bugs where functions individually work but cancel each other out, produce wrong final state, or leave the UI in an inconsistent state. Use when: systematic debugging found no bugs but users report broken buttons, or after any major refactor touching shared state stores." metadata: origin: community
/click-path-audit — Behavioural Flow Audit
Find bugs that static code reading misses: state interaction side effects, race conditions between sequential calls, and handlers that silently undo each other.
The Problem This Solves
Traditional debugging checks:
- Does the function exist? (missing wiring)
- Does it crash? (runtime errors)
- Does it return the right type? (data flow)
But it does NOT check:
- **Does the final UI state match what the button label promises?**
- **Does function B silently undo what function A just did?**
- **Does shared state (Zustand/Redux/context) have side effects that cancel the intended action?**
Real example: A "New Email" button called `setComposeMode(true)` then `selectThread(null)`. Both worked individually. But `selectThread` had a side effect resetting `composeMode: false`. The button did nothing. 54 bugs were found by systematic debugging — this one was missed.
---
How It Works
For EVERY interactive touchpoint in the target area:
1. IDENTIFY the handler (onClick, onSubmit, onChange, etc.) 2. TRACE every function call in the handler, IN ORDER 3. For EACH function call: a. What state does it READ? b. What state does it WRITE? c. Does it have SIDE EFFECTS on shared state? d. Does it reset/clear any state as a side effect? 4. CHECK: Does any later call UNDO a state change from an earlier call? 5. CHECK: Is the FINAL state what the user expects from the button label? 6. CHECK: Are there race conditions (async calls that resolve in wrong order)?
---
Execution Steps
Step 1: Map State Stores
Before auditing any touchpoint, build a side-effect map of every state store action:
For each Zustand store / React context in scope:
For each action/setter:
- What fields does it set?
- Does it RESET other fields as a side effect?
- Document: actionName → {sets: [...], resets: [...]}This is the critical reference. The "New Email" bug was invisible without knowing that `selectThread` resets `composeMode`.
**Output format:**
STORE: emailStore
setComposeMode(bool) → sets: {composeMode}
selectThread(thread|null) → sets: {selectedThread, selectedThreadId, messages, drafts, selectedDraft, summary} RESETS: {composeMode: false, composeData: null, redraftOpen: false}
setDraftGenerating(bool) → sets: {draftGenerating}
...
DANGEROUS RESETS (actions that clear state they don't own):
selectThread → resets composeMode (owned by setComposeMode)
reset → resets everythingStep 2: Audit Each Touchpoint
For each button/toggle/form submit in the target area:
TOUCHPOINT: [Button label] in [Component:line]
HANDLER: onClick → {
call 1: functionA() → sets {X: true}
call 2: functionB() → sets {Y: null} RESETS {X: false} ← CONFLICT
}
EXPECTED: User sees [description of what button label promises]
ACTUAL: X is false because functionB reset it
VERDICT: BUG — [description]**Check each of these bug patterns:**
Pattern 1: Sequential Undo
handler() {
setState_A(true) // sets X = true
setState_B(null) // side effect: resets X = false
}
// Result: X is false. First call was pointless.Pattern 2: Async Race
handler() {
fetchA().then(() => setState({ loading: false }))
fetchB().then(() => setState({ loading: true }))
}
// Result: final loading state depends on which resolves firstPattern 3: Stale Closure
const [count, setCount] = useState(0)
const handler = useCallback(() => {
setCount(count + 1) // captures stale count
setCount(count + 1) // same stale count — increments by 1, not 2
}, [count])Pattern 4: Missing State Transition
// Button says "Save" but handler only validates, never actually saves // Button says "Delete" but handler sets a flag without calling the API // Button says "Send" but the API endpoint is removed/broken
Pattern 5: Conditional Dead Path
handler() {
if (someState) { // someState is ALWAYS false at this point
doTheActualThing() // never reached
}
}Pattern 6: useEffect Interference
// Button sets stateX = true // A useEffect watches stateX and resets it to false // User sees nothing happen
Step 3: Report
For each bug found:
CLICK-PATH-NNN: [severity: CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]
Touchpoint: [Button label] in [file:line]
Pattern: [Sequential Undo / Async Race / Stale Closure / Missing Transition / Dead Path / useEffect Interference]
Handler: [function name or inline]
Trace:
1. [call] → sets {field: value}
2. [call] → RESETS {field: value} ← CONFLICT
Expected: [what user expects]
Actual: [what actually happens]
Fix: [specific fix]---
Scope Control
This audit is expensive. Scope it appropriately:
- **Full app audit:** Use when launching or after major refactor. Launch parallel agents per page.
- **Single page audit:** Use after building a new page or after a user reports a broken button.
- **Store-focused audit:** Use after modifying a Zustand store — audit all consumers of the changed actions.
Recommended agent split for full app:
Agent 1: Map ALL state stores (Step 1) — this is shared context for all other agents Agent 2: Dashboard (Tasks, Notes, Journal, Ideas) Agent 3: Chat (DanteChatColumn, JustChatPage) Agent 4: Emails (ThreadList, DraftArea, EmailsPage) Agent 5: Projects (ProjectsPage, ProjectOverviewTab, NewProjectWizard) Agent 6: CRM (all sub-tabs) Agent 7: Profile, Settings, Vault, Notifications Agent 8: Management Suite (all pages)
Agent
Your agent can write code, but ECC gives it a coordinated engineering system and toolbox: it plans before it builds, verifies changes with tests, reviews its own work from a fresh context, remembers what matters, and turns repeated wins into reusable skills
Repo: affaan-m/ECC
Other skills on ecc.
- /everything-claude-code
Development conventions and patterns for everything-claude-code. JavaScript project with conventional commits.
Open skill - /accessibility
Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA
Open skill - /agent-architecture-audit
Full-stack diagnostic for agent and LLM applications. Audits the 12-layer agent stack for wrapper regression, memory pollution, tool discipline failures, hidden repair loops, and rendering corruption. Produces severity-ranked findings with code-first fixes. Essential for
Open skill - /agent-eval
Head-to-head comparison of coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on custom tasks with pass rate, cost, time, and consistency metrics
Open skill - /agent-harness-construction
Design and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates.
Open skill - /agent-introspection-debugging
Structured self-debugging workflow for AI agent failures using capture, diagnosis, contained recovery, and introspection reports.
Open skill

