/browser-qa
Use this skill to automate visual testing and UI interaction verification using browser automation after deploying features.
$ npx -y skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill browser-qa --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/browser-qa
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use this skill to automate visual testing and UI interaction verification using browser automation after deploying features.
SKILL.md
browser-qa.SKILL.mdname: browser-qa
description: Use this skill to automate visual testing and UI interaction verification using browser automation after deploying features.
metadata:
origin: ECC
Browser QA — Automated Visual Testing & Interaction
When to Use
- After deploying a feature to staging/preview
- When you need to verify UI behavior across pages
- Before shipping — confirm layouts, forms, interactions actually work
- When reviewing PRs that touch frontend code
- Accessibility audits and responsive testing
How It Works
Uses the browser automation MCP (claude-in-chrome, Playwright, or Puppeteer) to interact with live pages like a real user.
Safety first — blast radius (run read-only by default)
Browser QA drives real auth and real user journeys, so treat the blast radius explicitly. Default to **read-only**: never run a **mutating** journey (checkout, payment, delete, mass-update) against a production URL — require an explicit opt-in **and** a staging/preview URL. Use seeded **test credentials**, never real production logins, and **redact** credentials/tokens/PII before saving any screenshot.
Phase 1: Smoke Test
1. Navigate to target URL
2. Check for console errors (filter noise: analytics, third-party)
3. Verify no 4xx/5xx in network requests
4. Screenshot above-the-fold on desktop + mobile viewport
5. Check Core Web Vitals: LCP < 2.5s, CLS < 0.1, INP < 200ms
(INP replaced FID in March 2024; thresholds per web.dev)
Phase 2: Interaction Test
1. Click every nav link — verify no dead links
2. Submit forms with valid data — verify success state
3. Submit forms with invalid data — verify error state
4. Test auth flow: login → protected page → logout (test creds only, never prod)
5. Test critical user journeys (checkout, onboarding, search)
— read-only by default; only exercise mutating journeys against staging
with explicit opt-in (see "Safety first" above)Phase 3: Visual Regression
1. Screenshot key pages at 3 breakpoints (375px, 768px, 1440px)
2. Compare against committed baseline screenshots
— no baseline ⇒ report INCONCLUSIVE, never a silent PASS
3. Flag layout shifts > 5px, missing elements, overflow
4. Check dark mode if applicable
Phase 4: Accessibility
1. Run axe-core or equivalent on each page
2. Flag WCAG 2.2 AA violations (contrast, labels, focus order)
3. Verify keyboard navigation works end-to-end
4. Check screen reader landmarks
> Note: axe-core automatically covers roughly 30–40% of WCAG. A clean run is **necessary, > not sufficient** — keyboard nav, focus order, and a screen-reader pass still need a manual > check. Don't report "accessible" from an automated pass alone.
Output Format
## QA Report — [URL] — [timestamp]
### Smoke Test
- Console errors: 0 critical, 2 warnings (analytics noise)
- Network: all 200/304, no failures
- Core Web Vitals: LCP 1.2s ✓, CLS 0.02 ✓, INP 89ms ✓
### Interactions
- [✓] Nav links: 12/12 working
- [✗] Contact form: missing error state for invalid email
- [✓] Auth flow: login/logout working
### Visual
- [✗] Hero section overflows on 375px viewport
- [✓] Dark mode: all pages consistent
### Accessibility
- 2 AA violations: missing alt text on hero image, low contrast on footer links
### Verdict: SHIP WITH FIXES (2 issues, 0 blockers)
# verdict ∈ SHIP / SHIP WITH FIXES / DO NOT SHIP; use INCONCLUSIVE if no visual baseline
Integration
Works with any browser MCP:
- `mChild__claude-in-chrome__*` tools (preferred — uses your actual Chrome)
- Playwright via `mcp__browserbase__*`
- Direct Puppeteer scripts
Pair with `/canary-watch` for post-deploy monitoring.
Read more
name: browser-qa description: Use this skill to automate visual testing and UI interaction verification using browser automation after deploying features. metadata: origin: ECC
Browser QA — Automated Visual Testing & Interaction
When to Use
- After deploying a feature to staging/preview
- When you need to verify UI behavior across pages
- Before shipping — confirm layouts, forms, interactions actually work
- When reviewing PRs that touch frontend code
- Accessibility audits and responsive testing
How It Works
Uses the browser automation MCP (claude-in-chrome, Playwright, or Puppeteer) to interact with live pages like a real user.
Safety first — blast radius (run read-only by default)
Browser QA drives real auth and real user journeys, so treat the blast radius explicitly. Default to **read-only**: never run a **mutating** journey (checkout, payment, delete, mass-update) against a production URL — require an explicit opt-in **and** a staging/preview URL. Use seeded **test credentials**, never real production logins, and **redact** credentials/tokens/PII before saving any screenshot.
Phase 1: Smoke Test
1. Navigate to target URL 2. Check for console errors (filter noise: analytics, third-party) 3. Verify no 4xx/5xx in network requests 4. Screenshot above-the-fold on desktop + mobile viewport 5. Check Core Web Vitals: LCP < 2.5s, CLS < 0.1, INP < 200ms (INP replaced FID in March 2024; thresholds per web.dev)
Phase 2: Interaction Test
1. Click every nav link — verify no dead links
2. Submit forms with valid data — verify success state
3. Submit forms with invalid data — verify error state
4. Test auth flow: login → protected page → logout (test creds only, never prod)
5. Test critical user journeys (checkout, onboarding, search)
— read-only by default; only exercise mutating journeys against staging
with explicit opt-in (see "Safety first" above)Phase 3: Visual Regression
1. Screenshot key pages at 3 breakpoints (375px, 768px, 1440px) 2. Compare against committed baseline screenshots — no baseline ⇒ report INCONCLUSIVE, never a silent PASS 3. Flag layout shifts > 5px, missing elements, overflow 4. Check dark mode if applicable
Phase 4: Accessibility
1. Run axe-core or equivalent on each page 2. Flag WCAG 2.2 AA violations (contrast, labels, focus order) 3. Verify keyboard navigation works end-to-end 4. Check screen reader landmarks
> Note: axe-core automatically covers roughly 30–40% of WCAG. A clean run is **necessary, > not sufficient** — keyboard nav, focus order, and a screen-reader pass still need a manual > check. Don't report "accessible" from an automated pass alone.
Output Format
## QA Report — [URL] — [timestamp] ### Smoke Test - Console errors: 0 critical, 2 warnings (analytics noise) - Network: all 200/304, no failures - Core Web Vitals: LCP 1.2s ✓, CLS 0.02 ✓, INP 89ms ✓ ### Interactions - [✓] Nav links: 12/12 working - [✗] Contact form: missing error state for invalid email - [✓] Auth flow: login/logout working ### Visual - [✗] Hero section overflows on 375px viewport - [✓] Dark mode: all pages consistent ### Accessibility - 2 AA violations: missing alt text on hero image, low contrast on footer links ### Verdict: SHIP WITH FIXES (2 issues, 0 blockers) # verdict ∈ SHIP / SHIP WITH FIXES / DO NOT SHIP; use INCONCLUSIVE if no visual baseline
Integration
Works with any browser MCP:
- `mChild__claude-in-chrome__*` tools (preferred — uses your actual Chrome)
- Playwright via `mcp__browserbase__*`
- Direct Puppeteer scripts
Pair with `/canary-watch` for post-deploy monitoring.
Your agent can write code, but ECC gives it a coordinated engineering system and toolbox: it plans before it builds, verifies changes with tests, reviews its own work from a fresh context, remembers what matters, and turns repeated wins into reusable skills
Repo: affaan-m/ECC
Other skills on ecc.
- /everything-claude-code
Development conventions and patterns for everything-claude-code. JavaScript project with conventional commits.
Open skill - /accessibility
Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA
Open skill - /agent-architecture-audit
Full-stack diagnostic for agent and LLM applications. Audits the 12-layer agent stack for wrapper regression, memory pollution, tool discipline failures, hidden repair loops, and rendering corruption. Produces severity-ranked findings with code-first fixes. Essential for
Open skill - /agent-eval
Head-to-head comparison of coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on custom tasks with pass rate, cost, time, and consistency metrics
Open skill - /agent-harness-construction
Design and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates.
Open skill - /agent-introspection-debugging
Structured self-debugging workflow for AI agent failures using capture, diagnosis, contained recovery, and introspection reports.
Open skill

