Skip to content
Security
Skill

/active-directory-attack-path

Analyzes and prioritizes Active Directory and BloodHound attack paths using evidence freshness, disabled principals, prerequisites, authorization, operational noise, and remediation coverage. Use during an authorized red-team operation when reviewing AD graphs, nested groups,

From plugin
skills
15257 skills

Claude Code

$ npx -y skills add zero-lab-ai/skills --skill active-directory-attack-path --agent claude-code

SKILL.md

active-directory-attack-path.SKILL.md
name: active-directory-attack-path
description: "Analyzes and prioritizes Active Directory and BloodHound attack paths using evidence freshness, disabled principals, prerequisites, authorization, operational noise, and remediation coverage. Use during an authorized red-team operation when reviewing AD graphs, nested groups, ACL abuse, delegation, sessions, GPO control, or routes to Tier Zero."
allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob

Active Directory attack paths

A graph relationship describes possible control. It does not prove current session state, usable credentials, authorized traversal, or the best route for an operation. Keep those claims separate.

When to Use

  • An authorized red-team operation when reviewing AD graphs, nested groups, ACL abuse, delegation, sessions, GPO control, or routes to Tier Zero.
  • Use only within explicit authorization and the stated rules of engagement.

When NOT to Use

  • Do not treat this skill as permission to access, test, or change a target.
  • Do not convert missing evidence into a clean result or a stronger claim.

Workflow

1. Confirm the owned starting principals, high-value objectives, allowed evidence reads, allowed traversal actions, and acceptable operational noise. 2. Inventory relevant users, groups, computers, GPOs, domains, and trusts. Record whether user and computer accounts are enabled and when volatile evidence was collected. 3. Normalize group membership, administrative rights, object-control rights, delegation, GPO-derived control, trusts, and session observations as directed edges. Resolve nested membership before declaring an effective path. 4. Give every node and edge an evidence reference and disposition. Current LDAP or security-descriptor evidence can establish a configuration relationship; stale session evidence remains a candidate. 5. Enumerate materially distinct paths from each owned principal to each stated objective. Include blocked branches when they explain why a visually connected graph is not viable. 6. For every edge, record required actions and operational noise. A structurally proven path may still require separate approval for a password reset, host access, credential interaction, authentication, ticket request, or state change. 7. Add remediations that sever every objective path. Prefer the smallest set of relationships or principals that removes the largest amount of reachability. 8. Report graph confidence and execution disposition separately. State that coverage applies to the supplied graph, not necessarily the whole domain.

Path decision table

| Evidence state | Path disposition | | --- | --- | | Current configuration evidence, met prerequisites, and every action authorized | Validation candidate; still not achieved access until executed | | Current configuration evidence but an active transition lacks approval | Structurally proven, approval required | | Stale session or unverified credential availability | Plausible candidate, not a current path | | Disabled principal, unmet prerequisite, explicit deny, or prohibited action | Blocked at the named edge | | Missing graph segment or unknown evidence freshness | Unknown; preserve the gap |

For each objective, report materially distinct paths, the weakest edge in each, required actions, operational signal, authorization state, and the smallest remediation set that severs all reported routes.

Interpretation rules

  • A disabled user can retain group membership while blocking a current

authentication path. Preserve both facts.

  • `HasSession` is volatile. Its age, logon type, and credential availability

determine whether it is evidence or only a lead.

  • Object control establishes authority over the object. It does not establish

that changing the object is authorized or operationally quiet.

  • Membership, GPO application, credential access, authentication, and downstream

impact are separate transitions.

  • An edge after the objective may show business impact without belonging to the

path used to reach that objective.

Rationalizations to reject

  • **"BloodHound drew a line, so the path works."** Graph data can be stale,

incomplete, or dependent on disabled principals and unmet prerequisites.

  • **"The shortest path is the best path."** A short password reset can be more

disruptive and detectable than a longer read-only validation route.

  • **"Membership proves authentication."** Disabled accounts and missing

credential material can make a valid membership edge operationally useless.

  • **"AdminTo proves credentials are available."** Host control and a session

observation are separate claims; session material may be absent or protected.

  • **"Read-only authorization covers harmless validation."** Resets, logons,

ticket requests, host access, credential interaction, and policy changes are active actions regardless of intent.

  • **"Fixing the first edge closes the domain."** Every distinct objective path

needs an explicit severing control and evidence after remediation.

Read more
@zero-lab-ai
Ships withskills

Portable, evidence-bound security skills for authorized defensive assessment, penetration testing, red teaming, detection engineering, purple teaming, and engagement operations. The collection contains 56 skills in 10 installable plugins from zero-lab.ai.

Stars on GitHub

Momentum

stars in total
152
Star history of zero-lab-ai/skills on GitHub, a chart by star-history.com

Other skills on skills.

agent-runtime-validation

agent-runtime-validati…

Plans and evaluates bounded runtime tests of AI agents, tools, memory, hooks, approvals, and scope enforcement. Use when static…

@zero-lab-ai@zero-lab-aiInstall Skill
agent-surface-audit

agent-surface-audit

Reviews an MCP server's tool surface for tool poisoning, over-broad parameters, missing descriptions, and privilege escalation…

@zero-lab-ai@zero-lab-aiInstall Skill
cloud-attack-path

cloud-attack-path

Maps cloud identity and authorization paths across AWS, Azure, GCP, and hybrid trust boundaries, separating proven access from…

@zero-lab-ai@zero-lab-aiInstall Skill

More skills from other plugins.

api-security

api-security

Use for authorized security assessment of REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, or SOAP APIs, including discovery, authentication,…

@zhaoxuya520@zhaoxuya520Install Skill
nemoclaw-user-guide

nemoclaw-user-guide

Find official NemoClaw documentation for installation, configuration, operation, or troubleshooting. Also handles requested docs…

@nvidia@nvidiaInstall Skill

Questions about active-directory-attack-path.

Which coding agents can use active-directory-attack-path?
active-directory-attack-path installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.