ork-assess
Assess a code change, design, architecture, workflow, or competing options against explicit criteria and evidence. Use when a…
Compare plausible implementation, architecture, product, or operational approaches before committing to one. Use when a request asks to brainstorm, think through options, choose an approach, evaluate trade-offs, or resolve significant uncertainty before implementation. Do not
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add yonatangross/orchestkit --skill ork-brainstorm --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add yonatangross/orchestkit --skill ork-brainstorm -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add yonatangross/orchestkit --skill ork-brainstorm -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add yonatangross/orchestkit --skill ork-brainstorm -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add yonatangross/orchestkit --skill ork-brainstorm -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add yonatangross/orchestkit --skill ork-brainstorm -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add yonatangross/orchestkit --skill ork-brainstorm -a windsurf -y
name: ork-brainstorm description: Compare plausible implementation, architecture, product, or operational approaches before committing to one. Use when a request asks to brainstorm, think through options, choose an approach, evaluate trade-offs, or resolve significant uncertainty before implementation. Do not use for an already specified mechanical change.
Frame the outcome, constraints, non-goals, and decision deadline. Inspect the relevant repository and existing decisions before proposing options.
Generate two to four materially different approaches. For each, state the implementation shape, benefits, costs, risks, dependencies, reversibility, and the evidence that would disprove it. Do not pad the list with cosmetic variations.
When an option depends on what a library, framework, or service can actually do today, confirm it with the context7 MCP server (`resolve-library-id`, then `query-docs`) before scoring it. An option built on a capability you only remember is an assumption, and it belongs in the unresolved list.
Use one context for a normal decision. Delegate only when there are at least three independent unknowns; give each subagent one bounded question and synthesize its evidence. Prefer the installed `ork_explorer` role when available, otherwise use Codex's built-in `explorer` role.
End with a recommendation, the decision rationale, unresolved assumptions, and the smallest next action. Do not edit files until the user asks to implement the chosen approach.
The Complete AI Development Toolkit for Claude Code. 115 skills, 36 agents, 163 hooks. Install `ork` for stable (v10.x).
Assess a code change, design, architecture, workflow, or competing options against explicit criteria and evidence. Use when a…
Map an unfamiliar codebase, feature, architecture, data flow, or operational path with file-backed evidence. Use when a request…
Render an answer inline as compact ASCII or box-drawing art with semantic status icons. Use for status, inventories, budgets,…
Make an approved, scoped change and prove the affected behavior. Use when a request asks to implement, build, add, or land a…
Review a pull request or branch for correctness, regressions, security, operational risk, and missing evidence. Use when a…
Verify that existing work is ready to merge, release, or hand off using an explicit evidence contract. Use when a request asks to…
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.