abstract-structure
Remove domain surface details to expose transferable relational/mechanistic structure at a chosen abstraction level.
Identify theories relevant to a gap and characterize their applicability. Evidence acquisition is not prescribed.
$ npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill identify-theory --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/identify-theoryContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Identify theories relevant to a gap and characterize their applicability. Evidence acquisition is not prescribed.
name: identify-theory description: "Identify theories relevant to a gap and characterize their applicability. Evidence acquisition is not prescribed."
Identify the theory or theoretical family that best organizes a claim, mechanism, or observed regularity.
required: [claim_or_mechanism, construct_definitions, evidence_context] optional: [candidate_theories, domain_scope] constraints: [theory identification requires construct and mechanism correspondence]
1. Extract constructs, relations, boundary conditions, and explanatory target. 2. Compare candidate theories by construct mapping and predicted relations. 3. Record supporting, conflicting, and missing evidence for each mapping. 4. State the selected theory or unresolved alternatives with scope limits.
produces: [theory_candidates, construct_mapping, relation_mapping, theory_assessment, scope_limits] delta_fields: [findings, hypothesis_updates, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]
Do not infer theoretical identity from shared vocabulary or force a theory when only a local mechanism is supported.
The complete research orchestration system for AI-native science. What It Does Design Philosophy Architecture (v3.2.2) Quick Start Configuration Roadmap License DARE is not a tool that helps you do research. It is the researcher.
Repo: yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine
Remove domain surface details to expose transferable relational/mechanistic structure at a chosen abstraction level.
Evaluate competing arguments against stated criteria and produce a reasoned verdict with uncertainty.
Move a scientific object up/down in abstraction or narrow/broaden selected scope dimensions (population, mechanism, context, outcome, timeframe, system…
Run structured attack/defense/adjudication over a claim, candidate, criterion set, or current winner. Perspective, target, escalation depth,…
Aggregate criterion or comparison results into an ordered recommendation under an explicit rule.
Abstract relational structure from source domains, map it to the target, validate depth, and instantiate transferable mechanisms.