abstract-structure
Remove domain surface details to expose transferable relational/mechanistic structure at a chosen abstraction level.
Extract evaluation-protocol elements from a source and mark unstated or ambiguous parameters.
$ npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill extract-evaluation-protocol --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/extract-evaluation-protocolContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Extract evaluation-protocol elements from a source and mark unstated or ambiguous parameters.
name: extract-evaluation-protocol description: "Extract evaluation-protocol elements from a source and mark unstated or ambiguous parameters."
Extract evaluation-protocol elements from a source and mark unstated or ambiguous parameters.
required: [source_record, protocol_schema] optional: [supplementary_materials, domain_defaults] constraints: [extracted values must distinguish stated, inferred, and missing]
1. Parse task, data, split, metric, baseline, budget, evaluator, and reporting elements. 2. Link each value to a source passage or record field. 3. Mark ambiguity, omission, and any inference made from context. 4. Emit a normalized protocol record with comparability notes.
If multiple protocols can now be represented on the same comparison schema, consider `compare-evaluation-protocols` as the next tactic.
produces: [protocol_record, source_links, ambiguity_log, comparability_notes] delta_fields: [evidence_updates, uncertainties, open_questions]
Do not fill omitted protocol values from common practice without an inference label.
The complete research orchestration system for AI-native science. What It Does Design Philosophy Architecture (v3.2.2) Quick Start Configuration Roadmap License DARE is not a tool that helps you do research. It is the researcher.
Repo: yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine
Remove domain surface details to expose transferable relational/mechanistic structure at a chosen abstraction level.
Evaluate competing arguments against stated criteria and produce a reasoned verdict with uncertainty.
Move a scientific object up/down in abstraction or narrow/broaden selected scope dimensions (population, mechanism, context, outcome, timeframe, system…
Run structured attack/defense/adjudication over a claim, candidate, criterion set, or current winner. Perspective, target, escalation depth,…
Aggregate criterion or comparison results into an ordered recommendation under an explicit rule.
Abstract relational structure from source domains, map it to the target, validate depth, and instantiate transferable mechanisms.