Skip to content
Automation
Skill

/compare-pair

Execute one pairwise comparison under a specified criterion/model and return winner, confidence, and reasons.

From plugin
de-anthropocentric-research-engine
499200 skills
Install
$ npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill compare-pair --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/compare-pair

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Execute one pairwise comparison under a specified criterion/model and return winner, confidence, and reasons.

SKILL.md

compare-pair.SKILL.md
name: compare-pair
description: "Execute one pairwise comparison under a specified criterion/model and return winner, confidence, and reasons."

compare-pair

Purpose

Execute one pairwise comparison under a declared criterion and return a winner, confidence, tie status, and reasons.

Input contract

required: [item_a, item_b, comparison_criterion, comparison_model, evidence_register]
optional: [tie_rule, prior_ratings]
constraints: [criterion direction and evidence scope are fixed before comparison]

Procedure

1. Verify that both items are comparable under the same criterion and evidence scope. 2. Assess item A and item B symmetrically, recording criterion-level evidence and limitations. 3. Select A, B, or tie; assign confidence on the declared scale and explain the decisive contrast. 4. Return the comparison record without updating global ratings.

Output contract

produces: [pairwise_result, confidence, rationale, evidence_gaps]
delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions]

Quality gates

  • The result includes exactly one winner or an explicit tie, confidence, criterion, and symmetric evidence notes.
  • Confidence cannot exceed the support of the weaker side of the comparison.

Failure and counterexamples

Do not compare items with different scopes or criteria. If evidence is asymmetric or incomparable, return unresolved rather than forcing a winner.

Provenance map

  • resolved: comparison-executor
  • resolved: gap-pairwise-judgment
Read more
Ships withde-anthropocentric-research-engine

The complete research orchestration system for AI-native science. What It Does Design Philosophy Architecture (v3.2.2) Quick Start Configuration Roadmap License DARE is not a tool that helps you do research. It is the researcher.

Get the whole plugin