Skip to content
Automation
Skill

/compare-evaluation-protocols

Build a protocol-difference matrix and estimate which differences can materially change measured performance.

From plugin
de-anthropocentric-research-engine
499200 skills
Install
$ npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill compare-evaluation-protocols --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/compare-evaluation-protocols

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Build a protocol-difference matrix and estimate which differences can materially change measured performance.

SKILL.md

compare-evaluation-protocols.SKILL.md
name: compare-evaluation-protocols
description: "Build a protocol-difference matrix and estimate which differences can materially change measured performance."

compare-evaluation-protocols

Purpose

Build a protocol-difference matrix and estimate which differences can materially change measured performance.

Input contract

required: [protocol_records, metric_schema, comparison_target]
optional: [paired_results, sensitivity_assumptions]
constraints: [differences require explicit protocol fields and a comparable outcome]

Procedure

1. Extract protocol elements into a normalized comparison schema. 2. Align datasets, populations, metrics, baselines, and evaluation conditions. 3. Mark differences and assess their plausible performance effect. 4. Separate observed effects from unresolved protocol confounding.

Output contract

produces: [protocol_difference_matrix, materiality_assessment, confounding_notes, comparability_judgment]
delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, open_questions]

Quality gates

  • The compared metric and target are held constant or explicitly qualified.
  • Missing protocol fields remain visible.

Failure and counterexamples

Do not attribute score differences to method quality when protocol differences are unmeasured.

Provenance map

  • `resolved: knowledge-acquisition-evaluation-protocol-comparison`
Read more
Ships withde-anthropocentric-research-engine

The complete research orchestration system for AI-native science. What It Does Design Philosophy Architecture (v3.2.2) Quick Start Configuration Roadmap License DARE is not a tool that helps you do research. It is the researcher.

Get the whole plugin