abstract-structure
Remove domain surface details to expose transferable relational/mechanistic structure at a chosen abstraction level.
Classify a tested claim as BROKEN, CORROBORATED, or UNFALSIFIABLE based on whether a legitimate falsifier succeeded, failed under adequate power, or cannot be specified/reached.
$ npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill classify-falsification-verdict --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/classify-falsification-verdictContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Classify a tested claim as BROKEN, CORROBORATED, or UNFALSIFIABLE based on whether a legitimate falsifier succeeded, failed under adequate power, or cannot be specified/reached.
name: classify-falsification-verdict description: "Classify a tested claim as BROKEN, CORROBORATED, or UNFALSIFIABLE based on whether a legitimate falsifier succeeded, failed under adequate power, or cannot be specified/reached."
Classify a tested claim as BROKEN, CORROBORATED, or UNFALSIFIABLE.
required: [claim, falsifier, test_result, adequacy_assessment] optional: [scope, power_or_precision] constraints: [falsifier must be legitimate and within scope]
1. Check the falsifier and scope. 2. Assess whether the test was adequate. 3. Return exactly one permitted verdict with rationale.
produces: [falsification_verdict, verdict_rationale, adequacy_assessment] delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions]
Do not treat an underpowered or unreachable test as corroboration.
The complete research orchestration system for AI-native science. What It Does Design Philosophy Architecture (v3.2.2) Quick Start Configuration Roadmap License DARE is not a tool that helps you do research. It is the researcher.
Repo: yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine
Remove domain surface details to expose transferable relational/mechanistic structure at a chosen abstraction level.
Evaluate competing arguments against stated criteria and produce a reasoned verdict with uncertainty.
Move a scientific object up/down in abstraction or narrow/broaden selected scope dimensions (population, mechanism, context, outcome, timeframe, system…
Run structured attack/defense/adjudication over a claim, candidate, criterion set, or current winner. Perspective, target, escalation depth,…
Aggregate criterion or comparison results into an ordered recommendation under an explicit rule.
Abstract relational structure from source domains, map it to the target, validate depth, and instantiate transferable mechanisms.