abstract-structure
Remove domain surface details to expose transferable relational/mechanistic structure at a chosen abstraction level.
@yogsoth-aiInstall SkillAutomation
Skill
/assess-problem-wickedness
Assess whether the problem is tame, complex, or wicked by examining stakeholder disagreement, moving boundaries, feedback, value conflict, and absence of a stable stopping rule.
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill assess-problem-wickedness --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill assess-problem-wickedness -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill assess-problem-wickedness -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill assess-problem-wickedness -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill assess-problem-wickedness -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill assess-problem-wickedness -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill assess-problem-wickedness -a windsurf -y
SKILL.md
assess-problem-wickedness.SKILL.mdname: assess-problem-wickedness
description: "Assess whether the problem is tame, complex, or wicked by examining stakeholder disagreement, moving boundaries, feedback, value conflict, and absence of a stable stopping rule."
assess-problem-wickedness
Purpose
Assess whether a problem is tame, complex, or wicked using disagreement, moving boundaries, feedback, value conflict, and stopping-rule evidence.
Input contract
required: [problem_statement, stakeholder_views]
optional: [boundary_history, feedback_observations, candidate_stopping_rule]
constraints: [classification must cite observed disagreement or stability indicators]
Procedure
1. Compare stakeholder definitions and desired outcomes. 2. Check boundary movement, feedback loops, and value conflicts. 3. Assess whether a stable stopping rule and agreed solution test exist. 4. Assign tame, complex, or wicked with evidence and uncertainty.
Output contract
produces: [wickedness_assessment, evidence_basis, workflow_implications]
delta_fields: [findings, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]
Quality gates
- Classification covers all five dimensions; disagreement is distinguished from missing information.
Failure and counterexamples
Do not label a problem wicked solely because it is difficult or interdisciplinary.
Provenance map
- `deep-insight/wickedness-assessment`: resolved.
Read more
name: assess-problem-wickedness description: "Assess whether the problem is tame, complex, or wicked by examining stakeholder disagreement, moving boundaries, feedback, value conflict, and absence of a stable stopping rule."
assess-problem-wickedness
Purpose
Assess whether a problem is tame, complex, or wicked using disagreement, moving boundaries, feedback, value conflict, and stopping-rule evidence.
Input contract
required: [problem_statement, stakeholder_views] optional: [boundary_history, feedback_observations, candidate_stopping_rule] constraints: [classification must cite observed disagreement or stability indicators]
Procedure
1. Compare stakeholder definitions and desired outcomes. 2. Check boundary movement, feedback loops, and value conflicts. 3. Assess whether a stable stopping rule and agreed solution test exist. 4. Assign tame, complex, or wicked with evidence and uncertainty.
Output contract
produces: [wickedness_assessment, evidence_basis, workflow_implications] delta_fields: [findings, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]
Quality gates
- Classification covers all five dimensions; disagreement is distinguished from missing information.
Failure and counterexamples
Do not label a problem wicked solely because it is difficult or interdisciplinary.
Provenance map
- `deep-insight/wickedness-assessment`: resolved.
Ships withde-anthropocentric-research-engine
A research skill graph for AI-native science. 271 markdown files. No runtime, no dependencies, no build step.
507200 skills
Stars on GitHub
Momentum
- stars in total
- 507
Other skills on de-anthropocentric-research-engine.
@yogsoth-aiInstall Skilladjudicate-exchange
Evaluate competing arguments against stated criteria and produce a reasoned verdict with uncertainty.
@yogsoth-aiInstall Skilladjust-abstraction-sco…
Move a scientific object up/down in abstraction or narrow/broaden selected scope dimensions (population, mechanism, context,…
@yogsoth-aiInstall Skilladversarial-deliberati…
Run structured attack/defense/adjudication over a claim, candidate, criterion set, or current winner. Perspective, target,…
@yogsoth-aiInstall Skillaggregate-ranking
Aggregate criterion or comparison results into an ordered recommendation under an explicit rule.
@yogsoth-aiInstall Skillanalogical-discovery
Abstract relational structure from source domains, map it to the target, validate depth, and instantiate transferable mechanisms.
@yogsoth-aiInstall SkillMore skills from other plugins.
browser-use
Direct browser control via CDP for web interaction: automation, scraping, testing, screenshots, and site/app work. Also covers…
@browser-useInstall Skillagent-browser
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling…
@vercel-labs-2Install Skill
Questions about assess-problem-wickedness.
- Which coding agents can use assess-problem-wickedness?
- assess-problem-wickedness installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.