screen-reader-testing
Test web applications with screen readers including VoiceOver, NVDA, and JAWS. Use when validating screen reader compatibility, debugging accessibility issues,…
Convert evaluation traces and production logs into SFT examples and preference pairs. Use when graded traces or failure examples exist and need to become training data, when applying rejection sampling to model outputs, or when building DPO pairs from passing and failing runs.
$ npx -y skills add wshobson/agents --skill trace-to-training-data --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/trace-to-training-dataContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Convert evaluation traces and production logs into SFT examples and preference pairs. Use when graded traces or failure examples exist and need to become training data, when applying rejection sampling to model outputs, or when building DPO pairs from passing and failing runs.
name: trace-to-training-data description: Convert evaluation traces and production logs into SFT examples and preference pairs. Use when graded traces or failure examples exist and need to become training data, when applying rejection sampling to model outputs, or when building DPO pairs from passing and failing runs.
This skill assumes `eval-harness-first` already graded the traces being converted here — goldens, graders, and `runs/<run-id>/results.json` all exist before conversion starts. This is the flywheel edge that skill names in its own flow: "the same labeled traces become the training set." Conversion happens here; grading already happened upstream.
**Input:** graded traces — `eval/goldens.jsonl` plus `runs/<run-id>/results.json`, each row carrying a `task_id`, a `verdict` from the grader, and a `reward` when the task supports a scalar score (judge score, execution partial-credit, or an RLVR verifier):
{"task_id": "t-042", "trace_id": "t-042-a3",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "..."}],
"verdict": "pass", "reward": 0.91,
"grader": "exact_match"}**Output format:** rows shaped exactly like `dataset-curation`'s Format Selection table — SFT `messages` rows or DPO `prompt`/`chosen`/`rejected` pairs — so this skill's output is that skill's input with no reshaping step in between.
The eval harness already did the labeling work: every trace in `results.json` carries a verdict, and often a reward, before this skill ever touches it. Converting a graded trace into a training row is mechanical — pick a shape from `dataset-curation`'s table, map fields, write JSONL. **Curation is the work that remains** — which traces clear a quality bar, which pairs are informative, and which rows must never enter the training set at all.
Treat any conversion step that requires re-judging a trace as a sign the harness is missing a grader, not a gap this skill should paper over. A trace with no verdict or reward isn't convertible yet — route it back to `eval-harness-first` first, don't hand-label it here to unblock conversion.
of successful trajectories**, not every passing one. Rank passing traces by reward and take a fraction (the Agent-lightning pattern) rather than every trace that merely cleared the pass bar — a trace that barely passed is a weaker SFT signal than one that scored well above threshold.
become gold SFT examples directly** (the Langfuse pattern) — when a human edits a failing trace's output into a correct one, that correction needs no reward threshold; a human already validated it. Route corrections straight into the SFT set.
whole-trajectory discard for multi-step traces.** When only some steps in a multi-step trajectory are bad, mask the loss on the bad steps and keep the good ones, rather than discarding the whole trajectory. SRFT reports 32.2% vs. 30.9% on SWE-bench for step-level critic masking over trajectory discard — a real, if modest, gap from the finer-grained cut.
passing-vs-failing trajectories on the SAME task**, never from unrelated best- and worst-scoring traces pulled across different tasks — cross-task pairs teach the model to prefer one task over another, not one response over another.
μ−2σ of the reward distribution for that task, never the absolute minimum.** `preference-optimization`'s Pair Construction section owns the full selection formula; this skill supplies the graded trajectories it consumes.
cuts pair volume without cutting signal.** Score each candidate pair by chosen-minus-rejected judge delta and keep only the highest-delta subset — the top 5k of a 16.5k candidate pool matched the full pool's downstream result. Build the full candidate set first, then filter by delta; don't cap generation at 5k up front.
and redact what's found.** Traces sourced from production logs can carry credentials, API keys, tokens, or customer data — run a secret/PII scan over every SFT and DPO row and redact matches; conversion fails closed (the row is dropped, not shipped with the raw content) if sensitive fields remain after redaction. Never commit secrets.
into training data.** Hold every `eval/goldens.jsonl` ID out of every converted SFT and DPO set — a trace that also appears as a golden trains on the exact item the checkpoint gets graded against later, silently inflating every subsequent eval run.
set**, not just within the newly converted rows — exact-match or embedding-similarity, matching `dataset-curation`'s dedup method field, run against whatever training data already exists before this batch merges in.
dataset card.** Every converted row must trace back to its source `run_id` and `trace_id` — `dataset-curation`'s Provenance field checks for exactly this link back to `trace-to-training-data` output; a row with no traceable source isn't ready to merge.
the graded traces this skill converts; a trace with no verdict or reward isn't convertible yet, route it back there before conversion.
target formats and the dataset card this skill's provenance data feeds; converted rows must match its Format Selection table field names exactly, not an approximation of them.
consumes the DPO pairs this skill builds and owns the full μ−2σ rejection-selection formula referenced above.
Worked JSONL
Production-ready agentic workflow building blocks: 94 plugins, 202 agents, 183 skills, 105 commands — built for Claude Code and consumed natively by OpenAI Codex CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, the Antigravity CLI, GitHub Copilot, and Pi from a single Markdown source.
Repo: wshobson/agents
Test web applications with screen readers including VoiceOver, NVDA, and JAWS. Use when validating screen reader compatibility, debugging accessibility issues,…
Conduct WCAG 2.2 accessibility audits with automated testing, manual verification, and remediation guidance. Use when auditing websites for accessibility,…
Coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions with finding deduplication, severity calibration, and consolidated reporting. Use this…
Debug complex issues using competing hypotheses with parallel investigation, evidence collection, and root cause arbitration. Use this skill when debugging…
Coordinate parallel feature development with file ownership strategies, conflict avoidance rules, and integration patterns for multi-agent implementation. Use…
Decompose complex tasks, design dependency graphs, and coordinate multi-agent work with proper task descriptions and workload balancing. Use this skill when…