/eval
Evaluate a plugin or skill for quality
$ npx -y skills add wshobson/agents --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfClaude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/eval
Context preview
What this command does when you run it.
Evaluate a plugin or skill for quality
Command definition
eval.mddescription: Evaluate a plugin or skill for quality
argument-hint: <path> [--depth quick|standard]
Run the PluginEval quality evaluation on a plugin or skill directory.
Usage
/eval <path> — evaluate at standard depth (static + LLM judge) /eval <path> --depth quick — static analysis only (instant)
Process
Step 1: Run Static Analysis (Layer 1)
cd "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}"
uv run plugin-eval score {argument} --depth quick --output jsonParse the JSON output to get `composite.score`, `composite.dimensions`, and `layers[0].anti_patterns`.
Step 2: LLM Judge (Layer 2) — if NOT --depth quick
Dispatch the `eval-judge` agent with the skill path:
> Evaluate the skill at: {resolved_path} > Read the SKILL.md file and any references/ files, then score it on all 4 dimensions. > Return your scores as JSON.
The judge returns scores for: triggering_accuracy, orchestration_fitness, output_quality, scope_calibration.
Step 3: Compute Final Score
**If quick depth:** Report the Layer 1 results directly from the CLI output.
**If standard depth:** Blend Layer 1 and Layer 2 scores.
For each dimension, use these blend weights (Static:Judge):
- triggering_accuracy: 0.375:0.625
- orchestration_fitness: 0.125:0.875
- output_quality: 0.0:1.0 (judge only)
- scope_calibration: 0.353:0.647
- progressive_disclosure: 1.0:0.0 (static only)
- token_efficiency: 0.8:0.2
- robustness: 0.0:1.0 (judge only)
- structural_completeness: 0.9:0.1
- code_template_quality: 0.3:0.7
- ecosystem_coherence: 0.85:0.15
Dimension weights: triggering(0.25), orchestration(0.20), output(0.15), scope(0.12), disclosure(0.10), efficiency(0.06), robustness(0.05), structural(0.03), code_quality(0.02), coherence(0.02)
Final = sum(weight * blended_score) * 100 * anti_pattern_penalty
Step 4: Present Results
## Overall Score: {score}/100 {badge}
## Layer Breakdown
| Layer | Score |
|-------|-------|
## Dimension Scores
| Dimension | Weight | Score | Grade |
|-----------|--------|-------|-------|
## Anti-Patterns Detected
## RecommendationsBadge thresholds: Platinum(90+), Gold(80+), Silver(70+), Bronze(60+)
Read more
description: Evaluate a plugin or skill for quality argument-hint: <path> [--depth quick|standard]
Run the PluginEval quality evaluation on a plugin or skill directory.
Usage
/eval <path> — evaluate at standard depth (static + LLM judge) /eval <path> --depth quick — static analysis only (instant)
Process
Step 1: Run Static Analysis (Layer 1)
cd "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}"
uv run plugin-eval score {argument} --depth quick --output jsonParse the JSON output to get `composite.score`, `composite.dimensions`, and `layers[0].anti_patterns`.
Step 2: LLM Judge (Layer 2) — if NOT --depth quick
Dispatch the `eval-judge` agent with the skill path:
> Evaluate the skill at: {resolved_path} > Read the SKILL.md file and any references/ files, then score it on all 4 dimensions. > Return your scores as JSON.
The judge returns scores for: triggering_accuracy, orchestration_fitness, output_quality, scope_calibration.
Step 3: Compute Final Score
**If quick depth:** Report the Layer 1 results directly from the CLI output.
**If standard depth:** Blend Layer 1 and Layer 2 scores.
For each dimension, use these blend weights (Static:Judge):
- triggering_accuracy: 0.375:0.625
- orchestration_fitness: 0.125:0.875
- output_quality: 0.0:1.0 (judge only)
- scope_calibration: 0.353:0.647
- progressive_disclosure: 1.0:0.0 (static only)
- token_efficiency: 0.8:0.2
- robustness: 0.0:1.0 (judge only)
- structural_completeness: 0.9:0.1
- code_template_quality: 0.3:0.7
- ecosystem_coherence: 0.85:0.15
Dimension weights: triggering(0.25), orchestration(0.20), output(0.15), scope(0.12), disclosure(0.10), efficiency(0.06), robustness(0.05), structural(0.03), code_quality(0.02), coherence(0.02)
Final = sum(weight * blended_score) * 100 * anti_pattern_penalty
Step 4: Present Results
## Overall Score: {score}/100 {badge}
## Layer Breakdown
| Layer | Score |
|-------|-------|
## Dimension Scores
| Dimension | Weight | Score | Grade |
|-----------|--------|-------|-------|
## Anti-Patterns Detected
## RecommendationsBadge thresholds: Platinum(90+), Gold(80+), Silver(70+), Bronze(60+)
Production-ready agentic workflow building blocks: 94 plugins, 203 agents, 175 skills, 109 commands — built for Claude Code and consumed natively by OpenAI Codex CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, Gemini CLI, and GitHub Copilot from a single Markdown source.
Repo: wshobson/agents
Other commands on wshobson-agents.
- /accessibility-audit
You are an accessibility expert specializing in WCAG compliance, inclusive design, and assistive technology compatibility. Conduct comprehensive audits, identify barriers, provide remediation guidance, and ensure digital products are accessible to all users.
Open command - /improve-agent
Systematic improvement of existing agents through performance analysis, prompt engineering, and continuous iteration.
Open command - /multi-agent-optimize
The Multi-Agent Optimization Tool is an advanced AI-driven framework designed to holistically improve system performance through intelligent, coordinated agent-based optimization. Leveraging cutting-edge AI orchestration techniques, this tool provides a comprehensive approach to
Open command - /team-debug
Debug issues using competing hypotheses with parallel investigation by multiple agents
Open command - /team-delegate
Task delegation dashboard for managing team workload, assignments, and rebalancing
Open command - /team-feature
Develop features in parallel with multiple agents using file ownership boundaries and dependency management
Open command

