agentic-actions-audito…
Audit GitHub Actions that run AI agents for prompt injection, unsafe interpolation, sandbox gaps, and permissive actor rules. Use…
Run CodeQL database creation and security queries, add data-extension models, or process CodeQL SARIF. Use when CodeQL is explicitly requested; use security-review for a broader manual security review.
$ npx -y skills add waybarrios/opencode-power-pack --skill codeql --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/codeqlContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Run CodeQL database creation and security queries, add data-extension models, or process CodeQL SARIF. Use when CodeQL is explicitly requested; use security-review for a broader manual security review.
name: codeql description: "Run CodeQL database creation and security queries, add data-extension models, or process CodeQL SARIF. Use when CodeQL is explicitly requested; use security-review for a broader manual security review." license: MIT (modified; see UPSTREAMS.json)
Supported languages: Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, Java/Kotlin, C/C++, C#, Ruby, Swift.
**Skill resources:** Reference files and templates are located at `references/` and `workflows/`.
1. **Database quality is non-negotiable.** A database that builds is not automatically good. Always run quality assessment (file counts, baseline LoC, extractor errors) and compare against expected source files. A cached build produces zero useful extraction.
2. **Data extensions catch what CodeQL misses.** Even projects using standard frameworks (Django, Spring, Express) have custom wrappers around database calls, request parsing, or shell execution. Skipping the create-data-extensions workflow means missing vulnerabilities in project-specific code paths.
3. **Explicit suite references prevent silent query dropping.** Never pass pack names directly to `codeql database analyze` — each pack's `defaultSuiteFile` applies hidden filters that can produce zero results. Always generate a custom `.qls` suite file.
4. **Zero findings needs investigation, not celebration.** Zero results can indicate poor database quality, missing models, wrong query packs, or silent suite filtering. Investigate before reporting clean.
5. **macOS Apple Silicon requires workarounds for compiled languages.** Exit code 137 is `arm64e`/`arm64` mismatch, not a build failure. Try Homebrew arm64 tools or Rosetta before falling back to `build-mode=none`.
6. **Follow workflows step by step.** Once a workflow is selected, execute it step by step without skipping phases. Each phase gates the next — skipping quality assessment or data extensions leads to incomplete analysis.
All generated files (database, build logs, diagnostics, extensions, results) are stored in a single output directory.
In both cases, **always create the directory** with `mkdir -p` before writing any files.
# Resolve output directory
if [ -n "$USER_SPECIFIED_DIR" ]; then
OUTPUT_DIR="$USER_SPECIFIED_DIR"
else
BASE="static_analysis_codeql"
N=1
while [ -e "${BASE}_${N}" ]; do
N=$((N + 1))
done
OUTPUT_DIR="${BASE}_${N}"
fi
mkdir -p "$OUTPUT_DIR"The output directory is resolved **once** at the start before any workflow executes. All workflows receive `$OUTPUT_DIR` and store their artifacts there:
$OUTPUT_DIR/
├── rulesets.txt # Selected query packs (logged after Step 3)
├── codeql.db/ # CodeQL database (dir containing codeql-database.yml)
├── build.log # Build log
├── codeql-config.yml # Exclusion config (interpreted languages)
├── diagnostics/ # Diagnostic queries and CSVs
├── extensions/ # Data extension YAMLs
├── raw/ # Unfiltered analysis output
│ ├── results.sarif
│ └── <mode>.qls
└── results/ # Final results (filtered for important-only, copied for run-all)
└── results.sarifA CodeQL database is identified by the presence of a `codeql-database.yml` marker file inside its directory. When searching for existing databases, **always collect all matches** — there may be multiple databases from previous runs or for different languages.
**Discovery command:**
# Find ALL CodeQL databases (top-level and one subdirectory deep) find . -maxdepth 3 -name "codeql-database.yml" -not -path "*/\.*" 2>/dev/null \ | while read -r yml; do dirname "$yml"; done
Never assume a database is named `codeql.db` — discover it by its marker file.
**When multiple databases are found:**
For each discovered database, collect metadata to help the user choose:
# For each database, extract language and creation time
for db in $FOUND_DBS; do
CODEQL_LANG=$(codeql resolve database --format=json -- "$db" 2>/dev/null | jq -r '.languages[0]')
CREATED=$(grep '^creationMetadata:' -A5 "$db/codeql-database.yml" 2>/dev/null | grep 'creationTime' | awk '{print $2}')
echo "$db — language: $CODEQL_LANG, created: $CREATED"
doneThen use `AskUserQuestion` to let the user select which database to use, or to build a new one. **Skip `AskUserQuestion` if the user explicitly stated which database to use or to build a new one in their prompt.**
For the common case ("scan this codebase for vulnerabilities"):
# 1. Verify CodeQL is installed
if ! command -v codeql >/dev/null 2>&1; then
echo "NOT INSTALLED: codeql binary not found on PATH"
else
codeql --version || echo "ERROR: codeql found but --version failed (check installation)"
fi
# 2. Resolve output directory
BASE="static_analysis_codeql"; N=1
while [ -e "${BASE}_${N}" ]; do N=$((N + 1)); done
OUTPUT_DIR="${BASE}_${N}"; mkdir -p "$OUTPUT_DIR"Then execute the full pipeline: **build database → create data extensions → run analysis** using the workflows below.
54 rigorous skills for Codex, OpenCode, and Pi: code review, security audit, feature development, frontend design, MCP tools, Hugging Face ML/training, and more.
Audit GitHub Actions that run AI agents for prompt injection, unsafe interpolation, sandbox gaps, and permissive actor rules. Use…
Audit and improve project-rules files (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, .agents/instructions, local overrides) so the agent keeps accurate…
Capture learnings from the current session into the project-rules file (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or local override) so future…
Operational rubric that turns "don't make AI slop" into observable properties, severity levels, evidence requirements, and repair…
Design a feature architecture by analyzing existing codebase patterns and conventions, then provide a comprehensive…
Deeply analyze an existing codebase feature by tracing execution paths, mapping architecture layers, understanding patterns and…