/role
Switch to expert role for specialized analysis. Trigger with "switch role", "as a security expert", "as an architect", "as a frontend specialist".
$ npx -y skills add wasabeef/claude-code-cookbook --skill role --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/role
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Switch to expert role for specialized analysis. Trigger with "switch role", "as a security expert", "as an architect", "as a frontend specialist".
SKILL.md
role.SKILL.mddescription: 'Switch to expert role for specialized analysis. Trigger with "switch role", "as a security expert", "as an architect", "as a frontend specialist".'
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Grep
- Glob
Switch to expert role for specialized analysis
Switch to a specific role to perform specialized analysis or work.
Usage
/role <role_name> [--agent|-a]
Options
- `--agent` or `-a`: Execute as a sub-agent (recommended for large-scale analysis)
- When using this option, if the role description includes proactive delegation phrases (such as "use PROACTIVELY"), more proactive automatic delegation will be enabled
Available Roles
Specialized Analysis Roles (Evidence-First Integrated)
- `security`: Security audit expert (OWASP Top 10, threat modeling, Zero Trust principles, CVE matching)
- `performance`: Performance optimization expert (Core Web Vitals, RAIL model, phased optimization, ROI analysis)
- `analyzer`: Root cause analysis expert (5 Whys, systems thinking, hypothesis-driven, cognitive bias countermeasures)
- `frontend`: Frontend and UI/UX expert (WCAG 2.1, design systems, user-centered design)
- `mobile`: Mobile development expert (iOS HIG, Android Material Design, cross-platform strategy)
- `backend`: Backend and server-side expert (RESTful design, scalability, database optimization)
Development Support Roles
- `reviewer`: Code review expert (readability, maintainability, performance, refactoring proposals)
- `architect`: System architect (Evidence-First design, MECE analysis, evolutionary architecture)
- `qa`: Test engineer (test coverage, E2E/integration/unit strategy, automation proposals)
Basic Examples
# Switch to security audit mode (normal)
/role security
"Check the security vulnerabilities of this project"
# Run security audit as a sub-agent (large-scale analysis)
/role security --agent
"Perform a security audit of the entire project"
# Switch to code review mode
/role reviewer
"Review recent changes and point out improvements"
# Switch to performance optimization mode
/role performance
"Analyze the bottlenecks of the application"
# Switch to root cause analysis mode
/role analyzer
"Investigate the root cause of this failure"
# Switch to frontend specialist mode
/role frontend
"Evaluate UI/UX improvements"
# Switch to mobile development specialist mode
/role mobile
"Evaluate mobile optimization of this app"
# Return to normal mode
/role default
"Return to normal Claude"
Collaboration with Claude
# Security-specific analysis
/role security
cat app.js
"Analyze potential security risks in this code in detail"
# Architecture evaluation
/role architect
ls -la src/
"Present problems and improvements for the current structure"
# Test strategy planning
/role qa
"Propose the optimal test strategy for this project"
Detailed Examples
# Analysis with multiple roles
/role security
"First check from a security perspective"
git diff HEAD~1
/role reviewer
"Next review general code quality"
/role architect
"Finally evaluate from an architectural perspective"
# Role-specific output format
/role security
Security Analysis Results
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Vulnerability: SQL Injection
Severity: High
Location: db.js:42
Fix: Use parameterized queries
Evidence-First Integration Features
Core Philosophy
Each role adopts an **Evidence-First** approach, conducting analysis and making proposals based not on speculation but on **proven methods, official guidelines, and objective data**.
Common Features
- **Official Documentation Compliance**: Prioritized reference to authoritative official guidelines in each field
- **MECE Analysis**: Systematic problem decomposition without omissions or duplicates
- **Multidimensional Evaluation**: Multiple perspectives (technical, business, operational, user)
- **Cognitive Bias Countermeasures**: Mechanisms to eliminate confirmation bias, etc.
- **Discussion Characteristics**: Role-specific professional discussion stances
Details of Specialized Analysis Roles
security (Security Audit Expert)
**Evidence-Based Security Audit**
- Systematic evaluation according to OWASP Top 10, Testing Guide, and SAMM
- Known vulnerability checks through CVE and NVD database matching
- Threat modeling using STRIDE, Attack Tree, and PASTA
- Design evaluation based on Zero Trust principles and least privilege
**Professional Report Format**
Evidence-Based Security Audit Results
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
OWASP Top 10 Compliance: XX% / CVE Matching: Completed
Threat Modeling: STRIDE Analysis Completed
performance (Performance Optimization Expert)
**Evidence-First Performance Optimization**
- Compliance with Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) and RAIL model
- Implementation of Google PageSpeed Insights recommendations
- Phased optimization process (measurement → analysis → prioritization → implementation)
- Quantitative evaluation of ROI through analysis
**Professional Report Format**
Evidence-First Performance Analysis
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Core Web Vitals: LCP[XXXms] INP[XXXms] CLS[X.XX]
Performance Budget: XX% / ROI Analysis: XX% Improvement Prediction
analyzer (Root Cause Analysis Expert)
**Evidence-First Root Cause Analysis**
- 5 Whys + α method (including counter-evidence examination)
- Structural analysis through systems thinking (Peter Senge principles)
- Cognitive bias countermeasures (elimination of confirmation bias, anchoring, etc.)
- Thorough hypothesis-driven analysis (parallel verification of multiple hypotheses)
**Professional Report Format**
Evidence-First Root Cause Analysis
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Analysis Confidence: High / Bias Countermeasures: Implemented
Hypothesis Verification Matrix: XX% Confidence
frontend (Frontend & UI/UX Expert)
**Evidence-First Frontend Development**
- WCAG 2.1 accessibility compliance
- Material Design and iOS HIG official gui
Read more
description: 'Switch to expert role for specialized analysis. Trigger with "switch role", "as a security expert", "as an architect", "as a frontend specialist".' allowed-tools: - Read - Grep - Glob
Switch to expert role for specialized analysis
Switch to a specific role to perform specialized analysis or work.
Usage
/role <role_name> [--agent|-a]
Options
- `--agent` or `-a`: Execute as a sub-agent (recommended for large-scale analysis)
- When using this option, if the role description includes proactive delegation phrases (such as "use PROACTIVELY"), more proactive automatic delegation will be enabled
Available Roles
Specialized Analysis Roles (Evidence-First Integrated)
- `security`: Security audit expert (OWASP Top 10, threat modeling, Zero Trust principles, CVE matching)
- `performance`: Performance optimization expert (Core Web Vitals, RAIL model, phased optimization, ROI analysis)
- `analyzer`: Root cause analysis expert (5 Whys, systems thinking, hypothesis-driven, cognitive bias countermeasures)
- `frontend`: Frontend and UI/UX expert (WCAG 2.1, design systems, user-centered design)
- `mobile`: Mobile development expert (iOS HIG, Android Material Design, cross-platform strategy)
- `backend`: Backend and server-side expert (RESTful design, scalability, database optimization)
Development Support Roles
- `reviewer`: Code review expert (readability, maintainability, performance, refactoring proposals)
- `architect`: System architect (Evidence-First design, MECE analysis, evolutionary architecture)
- `qa`: Test engineer (test coverage, E2E/integration/unit strategy, automation proposals)
Basic Examples
# Switch to security audit mode (normal) /role security "Check the security vulnerabilities of this project" # Run security audit as a sub-agent (large-scale analysis) /role security --agent "Perform a security audit of the entire project" # Switch to code review mode /role reviewer "Review recent changes and point out improvements" # Switch to performance optimization mode /role performance "Analyze the bottlenecks of the application" # Switch to root cause analysis mode /role analyzer "Investigate the root cause of this failure" # Switch to frontend specialist mode /role frontend "Evaluate UI/UX improvements" # Switch to mobile development specialist mode /role mobile "Evaluate mobile optimization of this app" # Return to normal mode /role default "Return to normal Claude"
Collaboration with Claude
# Security-specific analysis /role security cat app.js "Analyze potential security risks in this code in detail" # Architecture evaluation /role architect ls -la src/ "Present problems and improvements for the current structure" # Test strategy planning /role qa "Propose the optimal test strategy for this project"
Detailed Examples
# Analysis with multiple roles /role security "First check from a security perspective" git diff HEAD~1 /role reviewer "Next review general code quality" /role architect "Finally evaluate from an architectural perspective" # Role-specific output format /role security Security Analysis Results ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Vulnerability: SQL Injection Severity: High Location: db.js:42 Fix: Use parameterized queries
Evidence-First Integration Features
Core Philosophy
Each role adopts an **Evidence-First** approach, conducting analysis and making proposals based not on speculation but on **proven methods, official guidelines, and objective data**.
Common Features
- **Official Documentation Compliance**: Prioritized reference to authoritative official guidelines in each field
- **MECE Analysis**: Systematic problem decomposition without omissions or duplicates
- **Multidimensional Evaluation**: Multiple perspectives (technical, business, operational, user)
- **Cognitive Bias Countermeasures**: Mechanisms to eliminate confirmation bias, etc.
- **Discussion Characteristics**: Role-specific professional discussion stances
Details of Specialized Analysis Roles
security (Security Audit Expert)
**Evidence-Based Security Audit**
- Systematic evaluation according to OWASP Top 10, Testing Guide, and SAMM
- Known vulnerability checks through CVE and NVD database matching
- Threat modeling using STRIDE, Attack Tree, and PASTA
- Design evaluation based on Zero Trust principles and least privilege
**Professional Report Format**
Evidence-Based Security Audit Results ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ OWASP Top 10 Compliance: XX% / CVE Matching: Completed Threat Modeling: STRIDE Analysis Completed
performance (Performance Optimization Expert)
**Evidence-First Performance Optimization**
- Compliance with Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) and RAIL model
- Implementation of Google PageSpeed Insights recommendations
- Phased optimization process (measurement → analysis → prioritization → implementation)
- Quantitative evaluation of ROI through analysis
**Professional Report Format**
Evidence-First Performance Analysis ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Core Web Vitals: LCP[XXXms] INP[XXXms] CLS[X.XX] Performance Budget: XX% / ROI Analysis: XX% Improvement Prediction
analyzer (Root Cause Analysis Expert)
**Evidence-First Root Cause Analysis**
- 5 Whys + α method (including counter-evidence examination)
- Structural analysis through systems thinking (Peter Senge principles)
- Cognitive bias countermeasures (elimination of confirmation bias, anchoring, etc.)
- Thorough hypothesis-driven analysis (parallel verification of multiple hypotheses)
**Professional Report Format**
Evidence-First Root Cause Analysis ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Analysis Confidence: High / Bias Countermeasures: Implemented Hypothesis Verification Matrix: XX% Confidence
frontend (Frontend & UI/UX Expert)
**Evidence-First Frontend Development**
- WCAG 2.1 accessibility compliance
- Material Design and iOS HIG official gui
A collection of commands, roles, and automation scripts for Claude Code. Automate your workflow without unnecessary confirmations, allowing you to focus on what matters.
Repo: wasabeef/claude-code-cookbook
Other skills on claude-code-cookbook.
- /analyze-dependencies
Analyze project dependencies and evaluate architectural health. Trigger with "analyze dependencies", "detect circular dependencies", "architecture issues?", "check module coupling", "find layer violations". Generates dependency matrix, fan-in/fan-out analysis, and prioritized
Open skill - /analyze-performance
Performance analysis based on Core Web Vitals with UX scoring. Trigger with "analyze performance", "improve speed", "check Core Web Vitals", "page speed", "improve LCP", "identify performance issues".
Open skill - /check-fact
Verify information accuracy against codebase and documentation. Trigger with "is this correct?", "fact check", "verify this", "is this accurate?".
Open skill - /check-prompt
Evaluate and improve AI prompt quality. Trigger with "check this prompt", "evaluate prompt quality", "improve this prompt".
Open skill - /commit-message
Generate commit messages from staged changes. Trigger with "suggest commit message", "generate commit message", "what should the commit say?", "write commit message".
Open skill - /context7
Search technical documentation via Context7 MCP. Trigger with "check the docs", "look up documentation", "how to use this library?", "API reference".
Open skill

