/pr-fix

description: 'Efficiently respond to PR review comments. Trigger with "fix review comments", "address PR feedback", "implement review fixes", "respond to review".'
allowed-tools:
  - Bash(gh *)
  - Read
  - Edit
  - Grep
  - Glob

Efficiently respond to PR review comments

Efficiently handle Pull Request review comments and achieve root cause resolution using a 3-stage error analysis approach.

Usage

# Retrieve and analyze review comments
gh pr view --comments
"Classify review comments by priority and create an action plan"

# Detailed analysis of error-related comments
gh pr checks
"Analyze CI errors using a 3-stage approach to identify root causes"

# Quality confirmation after fixes
npm test && npm run lint
"Fixes are complete - please check regression tests and code quality"

Basic Examples

# Classify comments
gh pr view 123 --comments | head -20
"Classify review comments into must/imo/nits/q categories and determine response order"

# Collect error information
npm run build 2>&1 | tee error.log
"Identify the root cause of build errors and suggest appropriate fixes"

# Verify fix implementation
git diff HEAD~1
"Evaluate whether this fix appropriately addresses the review comments"

Comment Classification System

🔴 must: Required fixes
├─ Security issues
├─ Functional bugs
├─ Design principle violations
└─ Convention violations

🟡 imo: Improvement suggestions
├─ Better implementation methods
├─ Performance improvements
├─ Readability enhancements
└─ Refactoring proposals

🟢 nits: Minor points
├─ Typo fixes
├─ Indentation adjustments
├─ Comment additions
└─ Naming refinements

🔵 q: Questions/confirmations
├─ Implementation intent verification
├─ Specification clarification
├─ Design decision background
└─ Alternative solution consideration

3-Stage Error Analysis Approach

Stage 1: Information Collection

**Required actions**

• Full error message capture
• Stack trace review
• Reproduction condition identification

**Recommended actions**

• Environment information collection
• Recent change history
• Related logs review

Stage 2: Root Cause Analysis

• 5 Whys analysis application
• Dependency tracking
• Environment difference checking
• Minimal reproduction code creation

Stage 3: Solution Implementation

• Immediate response (hotfix)
• Root cause resolution (essential fix)
• Preventive measures (recurrence prevention)

Response Flow

1. **Comment analysis**: Classification by priority 2. **Fix plan**: Determining response order 3. **Phased fixes**: Critical → High → Medium → Low 4. **Quality confirmation**: Testing, linting, building 5. **Progress report**: Description of specific fixes

Post-Fix Verification

# Basic checks
npm test
npm run lint
npm run build

# Regression tests
npm run test:e2e

# Code quality
npm run test:coverage

Reply Templates

**Fix completion report**

@reviewer Thank you for your feedback.
Fixes are complete:

- [Specific fix details]
- [Test results]
- [Verification method]

**Technical decision explanation**

Implementation background: [Reason]
Considered alternatives: [Options and decision rationale]
Adopted solution benefits: [Advantages]

Notes

• **Priority adherence**: Address in order of Critical → High → Medium → Low
• **Test first**: Confirm regression tests before making fixes
• **Clear reporting**: Describe fix details and verification methods specifically
• **Constructive dialogue**: Polite communication based on technical grounds