/multi-role

description: 'Parallel analysis with multiple roles and integrated report. Trigger with "analyze from multiple perspectives", "multi-role analysis", "check both security and performance".'
allowed-tools:
  - Read
  - Grep
  - Glob

Parallel analysis with multiple roles and integrated report

A command that analyzes the same target in parallel with multiple roles and generates an integrated report.

Usage

/multi-role <role1>,<role2> [--agent|-a] [analysis_target]
/multi-role <role1>,<role2>,<role3> [--agent|-a] [analysis_target]

Available Roles

Specialized Analysis Roles

• `security`: Security audit expert
• `performance`: Performance optimization expert
• `analyzer`: Root cause analysis expert
• `frontend`: Frontend and UI/UX expert
• `mobile`: Mobile development expert
• `backend`: Backend and server-side expert

Development Support Roles

• `reviewer`: Code review expert
• `architect`: System architect
• `qa`: Test engineer

**Important**:

• Place the `--agent` option immediately after specifying roles
• Write your message after `--agent`
• Correct example: `/multi-role qa,architect --agent Evaluate the plan`
• Incorrect example: `/multi-role qa,architect Evaluate the plan --agent`

Options

• `--agent` or `-a`: Execute each role as a sub-agent in parallel (recommended for large-scale analysis)
• When using this option, if role descriptions include proactive delegation phrases (like "use PROACTIVELY"), more aggressive automatic delegation becomes enabled

Basic Examples

# Dual analysis of security and performance (normal)
/multi-role security,performance
"Evaluate this API endpoint"

# Parallel analysis of large-scale system (sub-agents)
/multi-role security,performance --agent
"Comprehensively analyze system security and performance"

# Integrated analysis of frontend, mobile, and performance
/multi-role frontend,mobile,performance
"Consider optimization proposals for this screen"

# Multifaceted evaluation of architecture design (sub-agents)
/multi-role architect,security,performance --agent
"Evaluate microservices design"

Analysis Process

Phase 1: Parallel Analysis

Each role independently analyzes the same target

• Perform evaluation from specialized perspective
• Make judgments based on role-specific criteria
• Generate independent recommendations

Phase 2: Integrated Analysis

Structure and integrate results

• Organize evaluation results from each role
• Identify overlaps and contradictions
• Clarify complementary relationships

Phase 3: Integrated Report

Generate final recommendations

• Prioritized action plan
• Explicit trade-offs
• Implementation roadmap

Output Format Examples

For 2-role Analysis

Multi-role Analysis: Security + Performance
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Analysis Target: API endpoint /api/users

Security Analysis Results:
Authentication: JWT verification properly implemented
Authorization: Role-based access control incomplete
Encryption: API keys logged in plain text

Evaluation Score: 65/100
Importance: High (due to sensitive data access)

Performance Analysis Results:
Response Time: Average 180ms (within target of 200ms)
Database Queries: N+1 problem detected
Caching: Redis cache not implemented

Evaluation Score: 70/100
Importance: Medium (currently within acceptable range)

Interrelated Analysis:
Synergistic Opportunities:
- Consider encryption when implementing Redis cache
- Improve logging for both security and performance gains

Trade-off Points:
- Authorization check strengthening ↔ Impact on response time
- Log encryption ↔ Reduced debugging efficiency

Integrated Priorities:
Critical: Fix API key plain text output
High: Resolve N+1 queries
Medium: Implement Redis cache + encryption
Low: Refine authorization control

Implementation Roadmap:
Week 1: Implement API key masking
Week 2: Database query optimization
Weeks 3-4: Cache layer design and implementation
Month 2: Progressive strengthening of authorization control

For 3-role Analysis

Multi-role Analysis: Frontend + Mobile + Performance
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Analysis Target: User Profile Screen

Frontend Analysis Results:
Usability: Intuitive layout
Accessibility: 85% WCAG 2.1 compliance
Responsive: Issues with tablet display

Mobile Analysis Results:
Touch Targets: 44pt+ ensured
One-handed Operation: Important buttons placed at top
Offline Support: Not implemented

Performance Analysis Results:
Initial Display: LCP 2.1s (good)
Image Optimization: WebP not supported
Lazy Loading: Not implemented

Integrated Recommendations:
1. Mobile optimization (one-handed operation + offline support)
2. Image optimization (WebP + lazy loading)
3. Tablet UI improvements

Priority: Mobile > Performance > Frontend
Implementation Period: 3-4 weeks

Effective Combination Patterns

Security-focused

/multi-role security,architect
"Authentication system design"

/multi-role security,frontend
"Login screen security"

/multi-role security,mobile
"Mobile app data protection"

Performance-focused

/multi-role performance,architect
"Scalability design"

/multi-role performance,frontend
"Web page speed optimization"

/multi-role performance,mobile
"App performance optimization"

User Experience-focused

/multi-role frontend,mobile
"Cross-platform UI"

/multi-role frontend,performance
"Balance between UX and performance"

/multi-role mobile,performance
"Mobile UX optimization"

Comprehensive Analysis

/multi-role architect,security,performance
"Overall system evaluation"

/multi-role frontend,mobile,performance
"Comprehensive user experience evaluation"

/multi-role security,performance,mobile
"Comprehensive mobile app diagnosis"

Collaboration with Claude

# Combine with file analysis
cat src/components/UserProfile.tsx
/multi-role frontend,mobile
"Evaluate this component from multiple perspectives"

# Evaluate design docu