analyze-selective-test…
Analyzes Xcode selective testing effectiveness for a test run, showing which test targets…
Compares two `tuist generate` runs to identify cache hit rate changes and root-cause analysis of cache invalidation. Can be invoked with generation IDs, dashboard URLs, or branch names.
$ npx -y skills add tuist/tuist --skill compare-generations --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/compare-generationsContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Compares two `tuist generate` runs to identify cache hit rate changes and root-cause analysis of cache invalidation. Can be invoked with generation IDs, dashboard URLs, or branch names.
name: compare-generations description: Compares two `tuist generate` runs to identify cache hit rate changes and root-cause analysis of cache invalidation. Can be invoked with generation IDs, dashboard URLs, or branch names.
You'll typically receive two generation identifiers. Follow these steps:
1. Run `tuist generate list --json` to find generations on each branch. 2. Run `tuist generate show <id> --json` for both base and head generations. 3. Compare duration, status, and cache hit rates. 4. Summarize cache changes with root cause analysis.
Fetch each directly:
tuist generate show <base-id> --json tuist generate show <head-id> --json
List recent generations on each branch:
tuist generate list --git-branch <base-branch> --json --page-size 1 tuist generate list --git-branch <head-branch> --json --page-size 1
Then fetch full details with `tuist generate show <id> --json`.
After fetching both generations, compare:
| Metric | What to check | |---|---| | `duration` | Flag if head is >10% slower | | `status` | Flag if base succeeded but head failed | | `cacheable_targets` | Note if target count changed | | `local_cache_target_hits` | Compare local hit counts | | `remote_cache_target_hits` | Compare remote hit counts | | `is_ci` | Note if one is CI and the other local |
Compute cache hit rates:
If cache hit rate dropped, the key question is: **which target(s) caused the invalidation cascade?**
Cache invalidation typically works like this: 1. A "root cause" target has a direct change (source file modified, build setting changed, etc.) 2. All targets that depend on the root cause target also get invalidated because their `dependencies` hash changes. 3. This cascade can invalidate many targets from a single root change.
Without the module cache target detail endpoint (available via MCP), use these heuristics:
1. Check `git diff` between the base and head commits to see which files changed. 2. Map changed files to their Tuist targets/modules. 3. Targets with direct source changes are likely root causes. 4. Targets that only changed due to dependency hash cascading are secondary invalidations.
| Cause | Description | |---|---| | Source changes | Files in the target's source directory were modified | | Resource changes | Assets, XIBs, storyboards, or other resources changed | | Build settings | Target or project build settings were modified | | Dependency changes | An external dependency version changed | | Info.plist changes | The target's Info.plist was modified | | Entitlements changes | The entitlements file was modified | | Deployment target | The minimum deployment target changed | | Headers | Public or project headers changed | | Project settings | Shared project-level settings changed |
Categorize the cache invalidation:
Produce a summary with:
1. **Overall verdict**: Cache hit rate improved, regressed, or stable. 2. **Cache hit rate**: Base rate vs head rate with delta. 3. **Duration**: Absolute and percentage change. 4. **Root cause targets**: Which targets had direct changes. 5. **Cascade impact**: How many targets were invalidated due to dependency cascading. 6. **Recommendations**: How to minimize cache invalidation.
Example:
Generation Comparison: base (gen-123 on main) vs head (gen-456 on feature-x) Duration: 12.5s -> 28.3s (+126%) -- REGRESSION Cache hit rate: 92% (46/50) -> 64% (32/50) (-28%) -- REGRESSION Status: success -> success Root cause: FoundationModule had source changes (3 files modified). This cascaded to 14 downstream targets that depend on FoundationModule. Cache invalidation breakdown: - Direct changes: FoundationModule (sources changed) - Cascade: NetworkModule, AuthModule, UIModule, + 11 others (dependency hash changed) Recommendations: - Consider splitting FoundationModule into smaller modules to reduce cascade impact - The 14 cascaded targets could benefit from more granular dependency declarations - If FoundationModule changes frequently, consider interface/implementation module splitting
Tuist supercharges your build system, whether you build with Xcode, Gradle, or Bazel.
Analyzes Xcode selective testing effectiveness for a test run, showing which test targets…
Compares two Xcode build runs to identify duration regressions, cache changes, and new…
Compares two app bundles to identify size changes, new or removed artifacts, and platform…
Compares two `tuist cache` runs to identify cache hit rate changes and root-cause analysis of…
Compares two Gradle build runs to identify duration regressions, cache changes, and task…
Compares a single test case's behavior across two branches, analyzing pass/fail status,…