ai-threat-testing
Offensive AI security testing and exploitation framework. Systematically tests LLM…
Domain assessment and web application mapping - subdomain discovery, port scanning, endpoint enumeration, API discovery, and attack surface analysis.
$ npx -y skills add transilienceai/communitytools --skill reconnaissance --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/reconnaissanceContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Domain assessment and web application mapping - subdomain discovery, port scanning, endpoint enumeration, API discovery, and attack surface analysis.
name: reconnaissance description: Domain assessment and web application mapping - subdomain discovery, port scanning, endpoint enumeration, API discovery, and attack surface analysis.
Domain and web application reconnaissance. Discovers subdomains, open ports, endpoints, APIs, and JavaScript routes to build attack surface inventory.
1. **Subdomain Discovery** - Passive DNS, certificate transparency, DNS brute-forcing, zone transfers 2. **Port Scanning** - nmap/masscan (top 1000/10000/all), service detection, OS fingerprinting 3. **Service Enumeration** - Version detection, banner grabbing, protocol-specific enumeration
0. **Software Inventory** - Dependencies, frameworks, SBOM generation 1. **Active Scanning** - ffuf, gobuster, nikto, ZAP spider for directories/files 2. **API Discovery** - REST, GraphQL, SOAP, WebSocket, Swagger/OpenAPI docs 3. **JavaScript & SPA** - Client-side routes, dynamic scripts, browser storage 4. **Surface Analysis** - Categorize attack surfaces, prioritize by risk
inventory/ - JSON: subdomains, ports, endpoints, APIs, SBOM analysis/ - MD: attack-surface, testing-checklist raw/ - Tool outputs (nmap, ffuf, ZAP, subfinder)
subfinder, amass, certspotter, crt.sh, nmap, masscan, nuclei, sslscan, ffuf, gobuster, nikto, ZAP, Playwright MCP
1. Passive discovery before active scanning 2. Always run `/osint` in parallel during Phase 2 3. Respect rate limits 4. Verify subdomains are live before port scanning 5. Save all raw tool outputs 6. **HTTP response header vhost leaks**: Always check response headers on the raw IP (`curl -sI http://IP/`). Headers like `X-Backend-Server`, `X-Forwarded-Host`, `X-Served-By`, `X-Upstream` often leak internal hostnames/vhosts not discoverable via DNS or brute-force. Add discovered hostnames to `/etc/hosts` immediately. 7. **Wildcard SSL certs** (`*.domain.tld` in SAN) = strong indicator of hidden vhosts. Always run vhost brute-force with `ffuf -u https://IP -k -H "Host: FUZZ.domain.tld" -w subdomains.txt -mc all -fs <default_size>` when wildcard SAN detected. Compare response size/status vs default vhost to identify valid subdomains. 8. **VHost enumeration without ffuf**: When ffuf/gobuster unavailable, use shell loop: `for sub in admin dev api portal dashboard staging git; do code=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}:%{size_download}" -H "Host: ${sub}.DOMAIN" http://IP); echo "$sub: $code"; done` — filter by response size difference from default page. 9. **Web management panels**: When discovering admin vhosts (admin.*, panel.*, manage.*), check for known management UIs: Nginx UI (`manifest.json` → "Nginx UI"), Cockpit, Webmin, phpMyAdmin. These often have unauthenticated API endpoints or known CVEs. Check `/api/backup`, `/api/settings`, `/api/install` for Nginx UI specifically. 10. **Mobile / native client downloads on the marketing tier**: when the public web tier has a download link to an `.apk` / `.dmg` / `.exe` / `.ipa`, the "real" API endpoint and its required headers are usually **only reachable from that client**. The web HTML shows nothing useful; the API is gated behind a static User-Agent / Host that's hard-coded in the binary. Always pull the client and decompile/extract before assuming the box is a static-page only. For Android React Native: `unzip <app>.apk -d ext/ && file ext/assets/index.android.bundle`. The bundle is typically obfuscator.io-style (`function _0xNNNN(idx)` decoder + `array.shift()` IIFE that loops until a parseInt-equation == target). Don't reverse it by hand — extract decoder + array literal + IIFE into a standalone Node.js file and dump every index in seconds: `for(let i=baseHex; i<baseHex+arr.length; i++) console.log(i.toString(16), _0xDecode(i));`. Then reconstruct the obfuscated object literal of the API call (URL = concatenation of 4–7 short fragments, headers likewise) and replay with the recovered values verbatim. 11. **Focused AD port scan for Windows targets**: when initial fingerprinting shows a Windows DC archetype (any of 53/135/139/445/389 open), skip `-p-` and run a focused scan over the 13 AD-relevant ports first — it finishes in seconds and covers everything that matters.
nmap -Pn -sC -sV -p 53,88,135,139,389,445,464,593,636,3268,3269,5985,5986,9389 -oA recon/ad-focused TARGET
Ports rationale: 53 DNS, 88 Kerberos, 135 RPC, 139/445 SMB, 389/636 LDAP/LDAPS, 464 kpasswd, 593 RPC-over-HTTPS, 3268/3269 GC/GC-LDAPS, 5985 WinRM (HTTP), 5986 WinRM (HTTPS — cert auth), 9389 AD Web Services. Always probe BOTH 5985 and 5986 — when 5985 is filtered, 5986 with client-cert auth is a common foothold path (see `skills/system/reference/foothold-patterns.md` WinRM cert-auth foothold). Only fall back to `-p-` if (a) no flag-yielding service surfaces in the focused scan, or (b) you suspect a non-standard app on a high port (custom web service, RDP-on-non-3389, etc.). Don't burn 30 minutes on full TCP sweeps when the AD archetype is obvious. 12. **CT-log enumeration is MANDATORY**: CT-log enumeration (crt.sh / certspotter / subfinder) is MANDATORY on every engagement that names an apex domain, INCLUDING grey-box engagements where hostnames were provided — provided hostnames are a seed, not the surface. CDN/WAF-fronted targets additionally get an origin-discovery pass (direct cloud endpoints, archive.org CDX, historical DNS). The crt.sh/subfinder commands already ship in `reference/scenarios/subdomain-enumeration.md` — use them.
Open-source Claude Code skills and agents for AI-powered penetration testing, bug bounty hunting, AI threat testing, and security reconnaissance — from the team at Transilience.ai
Repo: transilienceai/communitytools
Offensive AI security testing and exploitation framework. Systematically tests LLM…
API security testing - GraphQL, REST API, WebSocket, and Web-LLM attack techniques.
Stitches confirmed single-asset findings into multi-hop attack paths across the organization.…
Acquire an authenticated session THROUGH MFA/OTP on an in-scope target and emit a reusable…
Authentication security testing - auth bypass, JWT attacks, OAuth flaws, password attacks,…
Smart contract security testing and blockchain CTF exploitation. Covers Solidity…