Skip to content
Development
Skill

/backend-architect

Designs scalable backend architectures covering microservices, event-driven systems, API gateways, and data stores. Use when designing a backend system or when the user mentions backend architecture, scalability, or distributed systems.

From plugin
software-development-department
72116 skills28 agents1 MCP
Install
$ npx -y skills add tranhieutt/software_development_department --skill backend-architect --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/backend-architect

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Designs scalable backend architectures covering microservices, event-driven systems, API gateways, and data stores. Use when designing a backend system or when the user mentions backend architecture, scalability, or distributed systems.

SKILL.md

backend-architect.SKILL.md
name: backend-architect
type: workflow
description: "Designs scalable backend architectures covering microservices, event-driven systems, API gateways, and data stores. Use when designing a backend system or when the user mentions backend architecture, scalability, or distributed systems."
paths: ["**/src/**/*.ts", "**/src/**/*.js", "**/package.json"]
effort: 5
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Edit, Bash
argument-hint: "[project description or requirements]"
user-invocable: true
when_to_use: "When designing new backend services, defining service boundaries, or planning scalable API architecture"

Backend Architect

Workflow

1. **Capture requirements**: Domain context, use cases, NFRs (scale, latency, consistency) 2. **Define service boundaries**: DDD bounded contexts, service decomposition 3. **Design API contracts**: REST/GraphQL/gRPC with versioning strategy 4. **Plan communication**: Sync (REST, gRPC) vs async (queues, events) 5. **Build in resilience**: Circuit breakers, retries, timeouts, graceful degradation 6. **Design observability**: structured logging, RED metrics, distributed tracing 7. **Security**: Auth/Z strategy, rate limiting, secrets management 8. **Caching**: Layer strategy (app → API → CDN) with invalidation plan 9. **Document**: Service diagram (Mermaid), ADRs, trade-offs

API design decision matrix

| Use case | Protocol | Reason | |---|---|---| | Standard CRUD API | REST | Widest tooling support | | Client queries complex data | GraphQL | Reduces over-fetching | | Internal service-to-service | gRPC | Typed contracts, low latency | | Real-time bidirectional | WebSocket | Full duplex | | Server push (one-way) | SSE | Simpler than WS for unidirectional | | High-volume async work | SQS/Kafka | Decoupling, retry, backpressure |

Service boundary rules (non-obvious)

  • **Bounded context = 1 database** — shared DB across services creates hidden coupling; eventual consistency is the price of independence
  • **Sync calls create latency chains** — A → B → C means P99(A) = P99(A) + P99(B) + P99(C); use async for non-blocking flows
  • **Saga over 2PC** — distributed transactions via saga (choreography or orchestration); 2PC blocks and creates distributed deadlocks
  • **Stateless for horizontal scale** — session state in Redis/DynamoDB, not in memory
  • **Database per service, not schema per service** — separate schemas in shared DB = shared schema migrations = coupling still exists

Resilience patterns (always include these)

Circuit Breaker: CLOSED → [failures > threshold] → OPEN → [timeout] → HALF-OPEN → [success] → CLOSED
Retry: exponential backoff with jitter — base_delay * 2^attempt + random(0, base_delay)
Timeout: always set; propagate deadline via context/headers
Bulkhead: separate thread pools per dependency; one slow dep shouldn't starve others
Idempotency: every mutating operation needs idempotency key; store result, return on duplicate

Observability essentials

Logs:  structured JSON, always include: traceId, userId, duration, status
Metrics (RED): Rate (req/s), Errors (%), Duration (p50/p95/p99)
Traces: OpenTelemetry → Jaeger/Tempo; trace every cross-service call
Alerts: error rate > 1%, p99 latency > SLO, queue depth > threshold

Caching strategy

| Layer | Tool | Pattern | Invalidation | |---|---|---|---| | App | Redis | Cache-aside | TTL + event-driven | | API | CDN (CloudFront) | Read-through | Cache-Control headers | | DB reads | Read replica | Direct query | N/A (replica lag) |

Cache-aside rule: **read → cache miss → DB → cache set → return**. Never write to cache directly on writes — let TTL or event invalidate.

Auth patterns

  • **User auth**: OAuth2 + OIDC, JWT access token (15 min TTL) + refresh token (7 days, rotated)
  • **Service-to-service**: mTLS or signed JWT with short expiry; never share user tokens between services
  • **API keys**: Hash on storage (SHA-256), include key prefix in metadata for lookup

Deliver

  • Service diagram (Mermaid) showing communication patterns + boundaries
  • API contract excerpt (OpenAPI or Protobuf)
  • Auth/Z strategy
  • Resilience patterns per dependency
  • Caching plan with invalidation strategy
  • Tech recommendations with explicit rationale
  • ADR for each major decision

Scope boundaries

  • Database schema design → `database-architect`
  • Infrastructure + cloud services → `cloud-architect`
  • Comprehensive security audit → `security-auditor`
  • System-wide performance optimization → `performance-engineer`
Read more
Ships withsoftware-development-department

Software Development Department

Get the whole plugin