apply-turbo-handoffs
Audit the turbo skill lessons that /self-improve writes into this repo's .turbo/handoff/ from other projects, apply the ones the…
Review a pull request by fetching PR comments, running a comprehensive code review, evaluating findings, and dispatching to implementation. Use when the user asks to \"review PR\", \"review pull request\", \"review this PR\", \"check PR before merging\", or \"full PR review\".
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add tobihagemann/turbo --skill review-pr --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add tobihagemann/turbo --skill review-pr -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add tobihagemann/turbo --skill review-pr -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add tobihagemann/turbo --skill review-pr -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add tobihagemann/turbo --skill review-pr -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add tobihagemann/turbo --skill review-pr -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add tobihagemann/turbo --skill review-pr -a windsurf -y
name: review-pr description: "Review a pull request: run a full code review of its diff, evaluate findings, and implement them. Use when the user asks to \"review PR\", \"review this PR\", or \"check PR before merging\"."
Run a comprehensive code review of the PR's diff, evaluate findings, and dispatch accepted findings to implementation.
At the start, use `TaskCreate` to create a task for each step:
1. Resolve base branch 2. Run `/review-code` skill 3. Run `/evaluate-findings` skill 4. Run `/implement-findings` skill
Detect the PR's base branch and the issues it closes via `gh pr view --json baseRefName,closingIssuesReferences`, then run `git fetch origin <base-branch>` to bring the remote ref up to date.
When the PR closes issues, fetch each by its URL with `gh issue view <url> --json title,body,comments`, issuing the calls together. Together, their text is the governing document.
Run the `/review-code` skill. The diff command is `git diff origin/<base-branch>...HEAD`. Take the base from `origin/`: a local branch of the same name can sit behind the remote, which puts the merge base before an already-merged pull request and pulls merged work into the review as if it were new. Supply the governing document when there is one.
Run the `/evaluate-findings` skill on the results from Step 2.
If zero actionable findings survive evaluation, report that the code looks clean and stop.
Otherwise, run the `/implement-findings` skill on the accepted findings from Step 3.
Reusable workflows for planning, building, reviewing, and shipping with Claude Code and Codex.
Audit the turbo skill lessons that /self-improve writes into this repo's .turbo/handoff/ from other projects, apply the ones the…
Apply findings by making the suggested code changes. Applies accepted verdicts, escalates ambiguous findings to the user, and…
Assess project-wide structural technical debt: complexity hotspots, deprecated API usage, duplication clusters, architecture rot,…
Shared changelog conventions and formatting rules referenced by /create-changelog and /update-changelog. Not typically invoked…
Enforce existence, reuse, mirror, and symmetry principles to keep new code minimal and consistent with surrounding code. Use when…
Run autonomous task execution using the codex CLI. Use when the user asks to \"codex exec\", \"run codex exec\", \"execute a task…
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.