answer-reviewer-questi…
For each reviewer question on a PR, recall implementation reasoning and compose a raw answer. Use when the user asks to \"answer reviewer questions\", \"draft…
Review a pull request by fetching PR comments, running a comprehensive code review, evaluating findings, and dispatching to implementation. Use when the user asks to \"review PR\", \"review pull request\", \"review this PR\", \"check PR before merging\", or \"full PR review\".
$ npx -y skills add tobihagemann/turbo --skill review-pr --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/review-prContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Review a pull request by fetching PR comments, running a comprehensive code review, evaluating findings, and dispatching to implementation. Use when the user asks to \"review PR\", \"review pull request\", \"review this PR\", \"check PR before merging\", or \"full PR review\".
name: review-pr description: "Review a pull request by fetching PR comments, running a comprehensive code review, evaluating findings, and dispatching to implementation. Use when the user asks to \"review PR\", \"review pull request\", \"review this PR\", \"check PR before merging\", or \"full PR review\"."
Fetch PR context, run a comprehensive code review, evaluate findings, and dispatch accepted findings to implementation.
At the start, use `TaskCreate` to create a task for each step:
1. Run `/fetch-pr-comments` skill 2. Resolve base branch 3. Run `/review-code` skill 4. Run `/evaluate-findings` skill 5. Run `/resolve-findings` skill
Run the `/fetch-pr-comments` skill to get unresolved review comments.
Detect the PR's base branch via `gh pr view --json baseRefName --jq '.baseRefName'`, then run `git fetch origin <base-branch>` to bring the remote ref up to date.
Run the `/review-code` skill. The diff command is `git diff origin/<base-branch>...HEAD`. Take the base from `origin/`: a local branch of the same name can sit behind the remote, which puts the merge base before an already-merged pull request and pulls merged work into the review as if it were new.
Run the `/evaluate-findings` skill on the combined results from Step 3. Include any unresolved PR comments from Step 1 as additional findings for evaluation.
If zero actionable findings survive evaluation, report that the code looks clean and stop.
Otherwise, run the `/resolve-findings` skill on the accepted findings from Step 4.
A composable dev process for agentic coding harnesses, packaged as modular skills. Turbo has sibling editions for Claude Code and Codex. The Claude Code edition is production-tested.
For each reviewer question on a PR, recall implementation reasoning and compose a raw answer. Use when the user asks to \"answer reviewer questions\", \"draft…
Apply findings by making the suggested code changes. Applies accepted verdicts, escalates ambiguous findings to the user, and offers to note genuine…
Assess project-wide structural technical debt: complexity hotspots, deprecated API usage, duplication clusters, and architecture rot. Ranks findings by impact…
Project-wide health audit pipeline that fans out to all analysis skills in parallel, evaluates findings, and produces a unified report at .turbo/audit.md. Use…
Shared changelog conventions and formatting rules referenced by /create-changelog and /update-changelog. Not typically invoked directly.
Enforce existence, reuse, mirror, and symmetry principles to keep new code minimal and consistent with surrounding code. Use when writing new code in an…