Skip to content
Development
Skill

/review-plan

Review a plan by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Use when the user asks to \"review my plan\", \"check my plan\", \"critique my plan\", or wants feedback on a plan.

From plugin
turbo
41775 skills

Claude Code

$ npx -y skills add tobihagemann/turbo --skill review-plan --agent claude-code

SKILL.md

review-plan.SKILL.md
name: review-plan
description: "Review a plan with internal and peer reviews in parallel and return combined findings. Use when the user asks to \"review my plan\", \"check my plan\", or \"critique my plan\"."

Review Plan

Review a plan against structure and scope criteria. Runs internal reviews and `/peer-review` in parallel by default. Returns combined structured findings.

Step 1: Resolve the Plan

1. **Plan text in conversation** — use it 2. **Explicit path** — read it 3. **Explicit slug** — resolve to `.turbo/plans/<slug>.md` and read it 4. **Single file** — Glob `.turbo/plans/*.md`. If exactly one file exists, use it 5. **Most recent** — most recently modified file 6. **Legacy fallback** — `.turbo/plan.md` if `.turbo/plans/` does not exist 7. **Nothing found** — stop and state that no plan was found to review

When the plan came from a file, state the resolved path before continuing.

Unless the plan came from conversation text, or an explicit path or slug was passed, check whether the resolved plan still describes work that remains to be done. Report a frontmatter `status:` of `done` alongside the path.

Step 2: Run Reviews in Parallel

Two reference files carry the criteria, one per internal review:

  • [references/plan-structure-review.md](references/plan-structure-review.md)
  • [references/plan-scope-review.md](references/plan-scope-review.md)

Skip peer review when instructed (e.g., "without peer review", "no peer", "internal only").

When a list of already-adjudicated findings was supplied (one line each: the finding, its verdict, and the recorded reason), include it in every agent's prompt, internal and peer, labeled as decisions already reached on proposed revisions rather than as established properties of the plan. Direct each agent to treat a finding as listed when it matches one on both location and substance, to raise such a finding again only on evidence its recorded reason does not already account for, and to judge any other finding at the same location on its own merits.

Pass the plan to every agent, internal and peer, the same way: for a plan that is on disk, name its absolute path and direct the agent to read the file in full; for a plan that exists only as conversation text, include that text.

Emit all Agent tool calls below in one assistant message. Each Agent call uses `model: "opus"` and no `name`. Wait for every agent to report before continuing. Do not begin the next step on a partial set, and do not relaunch an agent that has not yet reported. That is three Agent tool calls when peer review is active (two internal + one peer), or two Agent tool calls when peer review is skipped. Every agent's prompt must direct it to treat the shared working tree and its git index as read-only and to assess findings by reading and reasoning. Each agent keeps the scratch files it writes, such as its starting `git status` snapshot, probes, and logs, in a scratch directory of its own, uniquely named under the session scratchpad directory, and refers to it by absolute path. HEAD stays where it is: read other refs with `git show <ref>:<path>` rather than `git checkout` or `git switch`. For a check that requires mutating code, the agent works in an isolated `git worktree` created under `$TMPDIR` and discarded afterward. Refer to that worktree by absolute path in every command and join chained steps with `&&`, so a failed step cannot leave the rest running in the shared checkout. Run teardown and verification as their own commands. Give that worktree its own dependency install rather than reaching the shared tree's install by any route: removing a worktree deletes through symlinks, and a redirected suite writes into the shared install. When its own install is not possible, the check is left unrun and reported as such. A check that runs in the shared checkout invokes an already-installed runner directly wherever a package-manager wrapper would front it, since such a wrapper reads as read-only while reconciling the shared install before it runs. Confine dependency installs and reconciliation to an isolated worktree. Every test runner the agent starts, in a worktree or in the shared checkout, runs in its own process group under a timeout enforced from outside the runner. Before teardown, the agent stops the process group of every runner it started, since stopping a runner can leave the processes it spawned alive. Afterward the agent verifies that `git worktree list` no longer shows the worktree, that `git status --short` shows what it showed at the start, and that HEAD is still on the branch it started on. It also confirms that no process from those groups, and none whose command line names the worktree path, if any, is still running, and reports by PID any process it could not stop. When it cannot list processes, it reports that check as unrun and names those process groups and the worktree path, if any. After any check, in a worktree or in the shared checkout, it verifies that the shared tree's dependency directory still resolves (a destroyed install leaves `git status` unchanged, since it is gitignored). Damage the agent cannot repair is reported with the exact repair command in place of findings.

  • **Structure Agent:** The subagent's prompt must include the plan, passed as above, the path to the structure reference file (`${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/plan-structure-review.md`), the output format below, and this directive: read that reference file directly, apply its determination criteria as the bar for a real finding, then report every finding that clears that bar tagged with its priority and with `internal (structure)`. Coverage is the goal at this stage, so surface everything that qualifies and let the priority tags convey severity. The subagent must also return the Overall Verdict block for its dimension.
  • **Scope Agent:** Same, with the scope reference file (`${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/plan-scope-review.md`) and findings tagged `internal (scope)`.
  • *
Read more
@tobihagemann
Ships withturbo

Reusable workflows for planning, building, reviewing, and shipping with Claude Code and Codex.

Stars on GitHub

Momentum

stars in total
417
Star history of tobihagemann/turbo on GitHub, a chart by star-history.com

Other skills on turbo.

apply-turbo-handoffs

apply-turbo-handoffs

Audit the turbo skill lessons that /self-improve writes into this repo's .turbo/handoff/ from other projects, apply the ones the…

@tobihagemann@tobihagemannInstall Skill
apply-findings

apply-findings

Apply findings by making the suggested code changes. Applies accepted verdicts, escalates ambiguous findings to the user, and…

@tobihagemann@tobihagemannInstall Skill
assess-technical-debt

assess-technical-debt

Assess project-wide structural technical debt: complexity hotspots, deprecated API usage, duplication clusters, architecture rot,…

@tobihagemann@tobihagemannInstall Skill
changelog-rules

changelog-rules

Shared changelog conventions and formatting rules referenced by /create-changelog and /update-changelog. Not typically invoked…

@tobihagemann@tobihagemannInstall Skill
code-style

code-style

Enforce existence, reuse, mirror, and symmetry principles to keep new code minimal and consistent with surrounding code. Use when…

@tobihagemann@tobihagemannInstall Skill
codex-exec

codex-exec

Run autonomous task execution using the codex CLI. Use when the user asks to \"codex exec\", \"run codex exec\", \"execute a task…

@tobihagemann@tobihagemannInstall Skill

More skills from other plugins.

brainstorming
Auto-invoked

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…

@obra@obraInstall Skill
ask-matt

ask-matt

Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.

skills10d309k
@mattpocock@mattpocockInstall Skill
accessibility
Auto-invoked

accessibility

Design, implement, and audit accessible UI to WCAG 2.2 Level AA across Web, iOS, and Android — semantic ARIA roles and labels,…

ecc12d293k
@affaan-m@affaan-mInstall Skill
compiler-commit

compiler-commit

Use when you want to verify compiler changes and commit with the correct convention. Runs tests, lint, and format, then commits…

react1d252k
@facebook@facebookInstall Skill

Questions about review-plan.

Which coding agents can use review-plan?
review-plan installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.