answer-reviewer-questi…
For each reviewer question on a PR, recall implementation reasoning and compose a raw answer. Use when the user asks to \"answer reviewer questions\", \"draft…
Choose an implementation path (direct or plan) for evaluated findings and dispatch it. Direct path applies fixes directly; plan path runs /turboplan. Use after /evaluate-findings has tagged findings and they need to be implemented, or when the user asks to \"resolve findings\",
$ npx -y skills add tobihagemann/turbo --skill resolve-findings --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/resolve-findingsContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Choose an implementation path (direct or plan) for evaluated findings and dispatch it. Direct path applies fixes directly; plan path runs /turboplan. Use after /evaluate-findings has tagged findings and they need to be implemented, or when the user asks to \"resolve findings\",
name: resolve-findings description: "Choose an implementation path (direct or plan) for evaluated findings and dispatch it. Direct path applies fixes directly; plan path runs /turboplan. Use after /evaluate-findings has tagged findings and they need to be implemented, or when the user asks to \"resolve findings\", \"apply evaluated findings\", or \"dispatch findings to implementation\"."
Choose a path for evaluated findings and run it. Direct path applies fixes directly; plan path runs `/turboplan`.
At the start, use `TaskCreate` to create a task for each step:
1. Choose path 2. Run the chosen path
Present a summary of accepted findings (Apply verdict): count by complexity (mechanical fixes vs. architectural or design changes). Then use `AskUserQuestion` to let the user choose:
Suggest Plan when findings include complex or architectural changes. Suggest Direct when all findings are mechanical fixes.
Add a **Get a second opinion** option whenever the findings would establish a pattern others will follow, change an interface, or commit to a data shape, and whenever neither path earns the suggestion with conviction. It runs the `/consult-codex` skill for which path the findings warrant on technical merit. Then resolve the path with that answer in hand, re-asking when the choice stays the user's.
Read the reference file for the confirmed path and follow its phases:
State the chosen path before continuing with the reference file.
Then use the TaskList tool and proceed to any remaining task.
A composable dev process for agentic coding harnesses, packaged as modular skills. Turbo has sibling editions for Claude Code and Codex. The Claude Code edition is production-tested.
For each reviewer question on a PR, recall implementation reasoning and compose a raw answer. Use when the user asks to \"answer reviewer questions\", \"draft…
Apply findings by making the suggested code changes. Applies accepted verdicts, escalates ambiguous findings to the user, and offers to note genuine…
Assess project-wide structural technical debt: complexity hotspots, deprecated API usage, duplication clusters, and architecture rot. Ranks findings by impact…
Project-wide health audit pipeline that fans out to all analysis skills in parallel, evaluates findings, and produces a unified report at .turbo/audit.md. Use…
Shared changelog conventions and formatting rules referenced by /create-changelog and /update-changelog. Not typically invoked directly.
Enforce existence, reuse, mirror, and symmetry principles to keep new code minimal and consistent with surrounding code. Use when writing new code in an…