erpaval
Workflow for autonomous software development with Claude Code. Classifiers route scope, complexity, directory state, and spec readiness before committing to…
Optional initial project context (e.g., "Python API for payments on AWS")
$ npx -y skills add theagenticguy/erpaval --skill tech-stack-builder --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/tech-stack-builderContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Optional initial project context (e.g., "Python API for payments on AWS")
name: tech-stack-builder
description: >
Opinionated tech stack recommendations and settled library references. Two
modes: (1) `/build-stack` runs parallel researcher agents to compare
candidates and emit a stack report + ADRs for greenfield projects; (2)
direct reference routing for coding with settled defaults. Use when the user
asks to recommend a stack, choose between frameworks, compare open-source
tools, scaffold a project with quality gates, set up a security pipeline, or
asks how to wire TanStack Router/Query/Table/Form, Motion, Recharts, D3,
React Three Fiber, dnd-kit, XY Flow, shadcn/blocks.so, Hono, tRPC, Litestar,
FastAPI, cyclopts, polars, DuckDB, Biome, pnpm, Vite, uv, ruff, ty, pyright,
mise, lefthook, golangci-lint, clippy, cargo-nextest, cargo-deny,
betterleaks, semgrep, osv-scanner, trivy, grype, hadolint, cosign, checkov,
CDK, or Amplify Gen 2 + Aurora. Do NOT use for product definition or PRD drafting
(use `product-discovery`); do NOT invoke directly when `erpaval` is running
— `erpaval` drives `/build-stack` through `CL-SPEC`.
arguments:
- name: context
description: Optional initial project context (e.g., "Python API for payments on AWS")
required: false
user_facing: true| File | When to load | | ------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | | `references/orchestrator.md` | Running `/build-stack` — intake → parallel research → synthesis → ADRs | | `references/opinionated-defaults.md` | Deciding health-check vs full-research per category | | `references/search-strategies.md` | Configuring researcher agent tool use (Context7, exa, nova, etc.) | | `references/health-check-criteria.md` | HEALTHY / CAUTION / WARNING classification for recommendations | | `references/output-templates.md` | Format specs for the stack report, ADRs, comparison matrices | | `references/domains/backend.md` | Backend researcher domain config | | `references/domains/frontend.md` | Frontend researcher domain config | | `references/domains/infra.md` | Infrastructure researcher domain config | | `references/domains/aws.md` | AWS researcher domain config | | `references/domains/devtools.md` | Dev-tooling researcher domain config | | `references/stacks/typescript/` | Settled TypeScript/React patterns — 15 library references | | `references/stacks/python/` | Settled Python patterns — core, CLI, API, data pipeline | | `references/stacks/go/` | Settled Go patterns — modules, golangci-lint, govulncheck, chi | | `references/stacks/rust/` | Settled Rust patterns — cargo, clippy, nextest, cargo-deny | | `references/stacks/shared/` | Cross-language tooling — mise, lefthook, security, CI/CD, containers | | `templates/stack-report.md` | Full report skeleton (instantiated by orchestrator) | | `templates/adr-template.md` | ADR format for significant choices | | `templates/comparison-matrix.md` | Comparison matrix format | | `templates/scaffold/` | Ready-to-copy project scaffolds — python, typescript, go, rust |
Two-mode skill: `/build-stack` runs parallel researcher agents to produce a stack report + ADRs, and standalone reference routing teaches settled coding patterns when the user is already building.
Runs a forked orchestrator that launches the plugin `researcher` agent in parallel across up to five domain configs (`backend`, `frontend`, `infra`, `aws`, `devtools`). Each instance researches its slice, scores candidates against `health-check-criteria.md`, and writes a comparison matrix. The orchestrator synthesizes, resolves conflicts via explicit priority (user constraints → avoid list → ecosystem coherence → health → familiarity), and emits:
| Artifact | Description | | ---------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | `tech-stack-report.md` | Unified stack table, per-layer analysis, comparison matrices, architecture diagram | | `adr/NNN-*.md` | 3–5 ADRs for non-obvious or long-horizon decisions | | Dependency snippets | `pyproject.toml`, `package.json`, `mise.toml` scoped to the recommended stack | | Scaffold (optional) | Phase 5 generates real config files via `templates/scaffold/` if the user opts in |
Hybrid defaults philosophy: ~60% of categories have opinionated winners (ruff, uv, biome, mise) — the researcher runs a **health check only** on those. The remaining ~40% (web framework, ORM, IaC, component library) get full comparison research, because the landscape actively shifts. See `references/opinionated-defaults.md` for the split.
To start: `/build-stack` with optional context (e.g., `/build-stack Python API for payments on AWS`). Full runbook in `references/orchestrator.md`.
When the user is already coding and needs a specific library pattern, route them to one reference file. Don't pre-load everything — each reference carries real weight, and loading all of them doubles the active context for no gain.
Start with the stack overview (`references/stacks/typescript/webapp.md`), then load one library reference on demand:
Autonomous software development for Claude Code. ERPAVal stands for Explore · Research · Plan · Act · Validate — the five-phase loop, plus a sixth Compound phase that writes durable lessons to disk so the next session inherits what this one learned.
Repo: theagenticguy/erpaval
Workflow for autonomous software development with Claude Code. Classifiers route scope, complexity, directory state, and spec readiness before committing to…
Shared canonical references for product-design frameworks — Pyramid Principle, Working Backwards, Double Diamond, research design, methodology selection.…
Optional path to raw content (brief, notes, tickets) or a one-line topic.
Agent UX patterns and human-in-the-loop design: Twilio A2H protocol, Levels of Autonomy (L0-L5), inbox pattern, progressive trust, decision journal, gate…
Customer research and problem framing using the research-design discipline: hypothesis, null hypothesis, MECE questions, methods, findings. Produces…
Audit and rewrite prompts against Claude Opus 4.7 instruction-following best practices. Produces a scored audit plus a rewritten prompt. Use when the user asks…