Skip to content
Development
Skill

/issue-triage

Triage a raw, vague issue or bug report into a structured document that names what is known, what is missing, and what to do next. Use when an incoming issue, bug report, or problem description is too vague or incomplete for investigation or planning, and recommend the right

From plugin
han
26345 skills25 agents
Install
$ npx -y skills add testdouble/han --skill issue-triage --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/issue-triage

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Triage a raw, vague issue or bug report into a structured document that names what is known, what is missing, and what to do next. Use when an incoming issue, bug report, or problem description is too vague or incomplete for investigation or planning, and recommend the right

SKILL.md

issue-triage.SKILL.md
name: issue-triage
description: >
  Triage a raw, vague issue or bug report into a structured document that names what is known, what is missing, and what
  to do next. Use when an incoming issue, bug report, or problem description is too vague or incomplete for
  investigation or planning, and recommend the right next han skill. Does not investigate root causes or trace code
  paths — use investigate for debugging, diagnosis, and root cause analysis. Does not plan features or build solutions —
  use plan-a-feature or plan-implementation for that.
argument-hint: "[issue text, bug report, or path to a report file; optional output path]"
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Bash(find *), Bash(mkdir *), Bash(bash "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/han-config-dir.sh")

Project Context

  • CLAUDE.md: !`find . -maxdepth 1 -name "CLAUDE.md" -type f`
  • project-discovery.md: !`find . -maxdepth 3 -name "project-discovery.md" -type f`
  • personal config directory: !`bash "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/han-config-dir.sh" 2>/dev/null || echo "$HOME/.claude"`
  • project .han/config.md: !`cat .han/config.md 2>/dev/null || echo ""`

As your first action, use the Read tool on `.han/config.md` inside the `personal config directory` path above. A read that returns no file is no personal configuration: continue silently. When that file or the `project .han/config.md` probe supplies content, apply it per [config-rule.md](../../references/config-rule.md), which governs precedence between the two files, relative-path resolution, and what to do with a file that reads but cannot be used.

Triage Approach

  • Work only from what the reporter wrote. Do not infer facts that are not stated. This is the single most important

constraint in this skill.

  • Classify the issue type before doing anything else. The type drives what counts as missing information.
  • Severity and reproducibility are estimates based on what is known. For a Bug, Regression, Performance, or Security

issue, mark them Unknown when not inferable. For a Feature Request, Question, or Other issue, omit them entirely when they are not inferable (see Step 4) rather than rendering Unknown.

  • The recommended next step is the single most appropriate han skill (or "clarify with reporter") to run after triage

completes.

  • Project context (CLAUDE.md, project-discovery.md) is read only to identify Suspected Areas. Never use it to supply

information the reporter omitted.

  • Source the standard by invoking `han-communication:readability-guidance` and apply it as you write the triage

document. Hold its default audience frame: a capable reader who did not do this work and lacks the author's context.

Issue Triage

Step 0: Resolve the Issue Text

Determine the issue text from the argument:

  • If the argument is a path to an existing file, read that file; its contents are the issue text.
  • Otherwise the argument text itself is the issue text.
  • If no argument was given and no issue text is present in the conversation, ask the reporter to paste the issue or bug

report, then stop until they provide it.

Step 1: Classify the Issue

Determine the issue type from the report text. Choose exactly one:

  • **Bug** — something is broken or behaving unexpectedly
  • **Feature Request** — something new is being asked for
  • **Performance** — the system is too slow, uses too much memory, or degrades under load
  • **Security** — a vulnerability, exposure, or access control concern
  • **Regression** — the reporter explicitly says it used to work and no longer does; quote or paraphrase that statement
  • **Question** — the reporter is asking how something works, not reporting a problem
  • **Other** — none of the above apply

Step 2: Extract What Is Known

From the report, identify:

  • **Summary** — one sentence describing the problem in plain terms
  • **Reported Behavior** — what the reporter said happened, in their words or a close paraphrase
  • **Expected Behavior** — what the reporter said should happen; if not stated, mark Unknown

Step 3: Identify Missing Information

List what a developer would need to reproduce or investigate this issue that is absent from the report. Common gaps by issue type:

  • **Bug / Regression** — reproduction steps, environment (OS, browser, version), error messages or stack traces,

affected data or user accounts, frequency of occurrence

  • **Performance** — scale or load at which the problem occurs, baseline measurements, environment
  • **Security** — affected endpoints or data, attack surface description, access level required to trigger
  • **Feature Request** — use case or job to be done, success criteria, constraints
  • **Feature Request / Question (problem space not yet decided)** — which options or approaches are in play, prior art, a

build-vs-buy choice, or which direction to take, when the reporter is asking to define or scope the problem rather than supplying a missing fact about a direction already chosen

List only what is genuinely absent. Do not list information already present in the report. If nothing is missing, write exactly: `None - report has enough to proceed.`

Step 4: Assess Severity and Reproducibility

**Severity** (estimate from what is known):

  • **Critical** — data loss, system down, security breach, or blocks all users
  • **High** — major feature broken, significant user impact, no workaround known
  • **Medium** — feature degraded, workaround exists, or affects a subset of users
  • **Low** — cosmetic, edge case, or minor inconvenience
  • **Unknown** — not enough information to assess

**Reproducibility** (estimate from what is known):

  • **Always** — happens consistently under described conditions
  • **Intermittent** — happens sometimes; conditions unclear
  • **Rare** — reported once or infrequently; hard to reproduce
  • **Unknown** — not stated in the report

**Omit when inapplicable.** Severity and Reproducibility describe a problem that is occurring. When the issue type is Feature Request, Question, or Other **

Read more
Ships withhan

Han is a suite of AI skills and agents for solo (or small-team) product engineers.

Get the whole plugin

Other skills on han.