component-common-domai…
Finds duplicate business logic spread across multiple components and suggests consolidation. Use when asking "where is this logic duplicated?", "find common…
Feature planning and implementation with 4 adaptive phases (Specify, Design, Tasks, Execute). Auto-sizes depth by complexity. Writes testable requirements in EARS notation, atomic tasks, atomic Conventional Commits, and requirement traceability. Ships deterministic Python
$ npx -y skills add tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill tlc-spec-driven --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/tlc-spec-drivenContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Feature planning and implementation with 4 adaptive phases (Specify, Design, Tasks, Execute). Auto-sizes depth by complexity. Writes testable requirements in EARS notation, atomic tasks, atomic Conventional Commits, and requirement traceability. Ships deterministic Python
name: tlc-spec-driven description: Feature planning and implementation with 4 adaptive phases (Specify, Design, Tasks, Execute). Auto-sizes depth by complexity. Writes testable requirements in EARS notation, atomic tasks, atomic Conventional Commits, and requirement traceability. Ships deterministic Python validation scripts so structural gates are enforced by code, not memory. Features an independent Verifier (author != verifier, evidence-or-zero), a discrimination sensor, a decision log (STATE.md), a test-coverage matrix, and a self-improving lessons layer. Stack-agnostic and tool-agnostic. Use when (1) planning features, (2) implementing with verification and atomic commits, (3) validating an implementation against a spec. Triggers on "specify feature", "discuss feature", "design", "tasks", "implement", "validate", "verify work", "UAT", "record decision", "pause work", "resume work". Do NOT use for pure architecture decomposition analysis or standalone technical design documents. license: CC-BY-4.0 metadata: author: Felipe Rodrigues - github.com/felipfr version: 3.3.0
Plan and implement features with precision. Granular tasks. Clear dependencies. Right tools. Zero ceremony.
┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ │ SPECIFY │ → │ DESIGN │ → │ TASKS │ → │ EXECUTE │ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └─────────┘ └─────────┘ required optional* optional* required * Agent auto-skips when scope doesn't need it
**Loading this skill's files.** Reference files live under `references/` in this skill's own directory (where this `SKILL.md` resides). Resolve them relative to the skill directory - never the workspace root - and load them through the active skill by name; never assume a fixed install path. When a step tells you to read a reference, **read it completely (to EOF)** before acting - never act on a partial/truncated read.
**Running this skill's scripts.** Every `scripts/*.py` shipped with this skill lives under that same skill directory. Resolve the skill directory first, then invoke `python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/<name>.py ...`. Never run `python3 scripts/...` from the consuming project root - that looks for a project-local `scripts/` tree that is not this skill. Project data under `.specs/` is still read/written relative to the project root (pass `--root` when the cwd is elsewhere). Below, `<skill-dir>` means the directory that contains this `SKILL.md`.
**Execution contract - every task, non-negotiable (holds even if you do not open the reference files):**
1. Tests derive from the spec's acceptance criteria and assert spec-defined outcomes - they never mirror the implementation. 2. The gate must pass (tests pass) before a task is done - the test runner decides, not self-assessment. 3. One atomic commit per task. Mark the task complete in `tasks.md` (and update spec traceability when used) **before** that commit, and include those updates in the same commit. Never batch tasks; never weaken, skip, or delete tests to make them pass. 4. After the LAST task, a fresh **Verifier always runs automatically** (author ≠ verifier) - spec-anchored outcome check + discrimination sensor. It is never optional and never prompted. See Sub-Agent Delegation. 5. **Blast radius:** approving a spec or tasks authorizes local implementation and local commits only. `git push`, force-push, deploy, production DB changes, and other remote / externally visible / destructive operations require an explicit go-ahead for that action.
**Deterministic gates run before human review - not from memory.** The structural gates for the spec and tasks are enforced by scripts in this skill's `scripts/` directory, so they cannot silently drift when the model forgets a step:
A non-zero exit means STOP and fix before proceeding. Skip a script only when no code-execution tool is available; then perform the same checks by reading the artifact.
**Before Execute:** read [implement.md](references/implement.md) completely and run `<skill-dir>/scripts/validate_tasks.py`; if a formal `tasks.md` packs into more than one task-budgeted batch (> ~8 tasks), present the sub-agent offer first (see Sub-Agent Delegation).
**The complexity determines the depth, not a fixed pipeline.** Before starting any feature, assess its scope and apply only what's needed:
| Scope | What | Specify | Design | Tasks | Execute | | ----------- | ------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------- | ---------------------------
The secure, validated skill registry for professional AI coding agents. Extend Antigravity, Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot and more with absolute confidence.
Repo: tech-leads-club/agent-skills
Finds duplicate business logic spread across multiple components and suggests consolidation. Use when asking "where is this logic duplicated?", "find common…
Detects misplaced classes and fixes component hierarchy problems — finds code that should belong inside a component but sits at the root level. Use when asking…
Maps architectural components in a codebase and measures their size to identify what should be extracted first. Use when asking "how big is each module?",…
Analyzes coupling between modules using the three-dimensional model (strength, distance, volatility) from "Balancing Coupling in Software Design". Use when…
Creates step-by-step decomposition plans and migration roadmaps for breaking apart monolithic applications. Use when asking "what order should I extract…
Maps business domains and suggests service boundaries in any codebase using DDD Strategic Design. Use when asking "what are the domains in this codebase?",…