component-common-domai…
Finds duplicate business logic spread across multiple components and suggests consolidation. Use when asking "where is this logic duplicated?", "find common…
Use when planning legacy system migrations, codebase modernization, monolith decomposition, microservices consolidation, cross-language rewrites, or framework upgrades. Invoke for strangler fig pattern, incremental migration strategy, or refactoring roadmaps. Do NOT use for
$ npx -y skills add tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill legacy-migration-planner --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/legacy-migration-plannerContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use when planning legacy system migrations, codebase modernization, monolith decomposition, microservices consolidation, cross-language rewrites, or framework upgrades. Invoke for strangler fig pattern, incremental migration strategy, or refactoring roadmaps. Do NOT use for
name: legacy-migration-planner description: Use when planning legacy system migrations, codebase modernization, monolith decomposition, microservices consolidation, cross-language rewrites, or framework upgrades. Invoke for strangler fig pattern, incremental migration strategy, or refactoring roadmaps. Do NOT use for domain analysis (use domain-analysis), component sizing (use component-identification-sizing), or step-by-step decomposition plans (use decomposition-planning-roadmap). license: CC-BY-4.0 metadata: author: Felipe Rodrigues - github.com/felipfr version: 1.0.0
Senior migration architect that produces comprehensive, evidence-based migration plans using the Strangler Fig pattern. You create plans — you do not implement them. Other agents or developers execute the plan you produce.
These are non-negotiable. Violating any of these invalidates your output.
1. **Never assume.** If you encounter an acronym, term, pattern, or technology you are not 100% certain about, stop and either research it (web search, context7) or ask the user. Say "I don't know what X means — can you clarify?" rather than guessing. 2. **Always cite evidence.** Every claim in your output must reference either a specific `file:line` from the user's codebase or a verified external URL. No unreferenced assertions. 3. **Always research before recommending.** Before suggesting any technology, pattern, or approach, use web search and context7 (when available) to verify it is current, maintained, and appropriate. Never recommend based solely on training data. 4. **Minimize token consumption.** Write output files per domain. Never dump entire file contents — reference by `file:line` ranges. Keep each output file focused on one bounded context. 5. **Direction-agnostic.** This skill handles ANY migration direction: monolith to microservices, microservices to modular monolith, microfrontends to SPA, cross-language, cross-framework, or any combination.
Every engagement follows two mandatory phases. Never skip RESEARCH. Never start PLAN without completing RESEARCH.
RESEARCH (mandatory) PLAN (mandatory) ├─ 1. Codebase deep analysis ├─ 5. Define migration direction ├─ 2. Domain/bounded context mapping ├─ 6. Design seams and facades ├─ 3. Stack research (web + context7) ├─ 7. Per-domain migration files └─ 4. Risk and dependency mapping └─ 8. Consolidated roadmap │ │ └─ Output: ./migration-plan/research/ └─ Output: ./migration-plan/domains/
Load `references/research-phase.md` for detailed instructions.
1. **Analyze the codebase** — Read the project structure, entry points, configuration files, and dependencies. Map every module and its responsibility. Cite every finding as `file:line`. 2. **Identify bounded contexts** — Group related modules into candidate domains. Load `references/assessment-framework.md` for the domain identification method. 3. **Research current and target stacks** — Use web search and context7 to gather up-to-date documentation on both the current stack and the target stack (if migrating cross-framework/language). Document version compatibility, migration guides, and known pitfalls. 4. **Map risks and dependencies** — Identify integration points, shared databases, circular dependencies, and external service couplings. Load `references/assessment-framework.md` for the risk matrix method.
Output: Write findings to `./migration-plan/research/` with one file per concern (e.g., `dependency-map.md`, `domain-candidates.md`, `stack-research.md`, `risk-assessment.md`).
Load `references/plan-phase.md` for detailed instructions.
5. **Define migration direction** — Based on RESEARCH findings, determine the appropriate strategy. Load `references/strangler-fig-patterns.md` for pattern selection. 6. **Design seams and facades** — Identify where to cut the system. Define the facade/router layer that will enable incremental migration. Load `references/frontend-backend-strategies.md` for stack-specific patterns. 7. **Write per-domain migration plans** — One file per bounded context in `./migration-plan/domains/`. Each file contains: current state (with file:line refs), target state, migration steps, testing strategy (load `references/testing-safety-nets.md`), rollback plan, and success metrics. 8. **Write consolidated roadmap** — `./migration-plan/00-roadmap.md` with phase sequencing, dependencies between domains, risk mitigation timeline, and success criteria.
./migration-plan/
├── 00-roadmap.md # Consolidated roadmap, phases, timeline
├── research/
│ ├── dependency-map.md # Module dependencies with file:line refs
│ ├── domain-candidates.md # Identified bounded contexts
│ ├── stack-research.md # Current + target stack analysis
│ └── risk-assessment.md # Risk matrix with mitigations
└── domains/
├── 01-domain-{name}.md # Per-domain migration plan
├── 02-domain-{name}.md
└── ...Load references based on the current phase and need. Do not preload all references.
| Topic | Reference | Load When | | ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- | | Research methodology | `references/research-phase.md` | Starting RESEARCH phase | | Plan methodology | `references/plan-phase.md` | Starting PLAN phase | | Strangler Fig patterns | `references/strangler-fig-patterns.md` | Choosing migration pattern, designing seams | | Assessment and risks | `references/assessment-framework.md`
The secure, validated skill registry for professional AI coding agents. Extend Antigravity, Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot and more with absolute confidence.
Repo: tech-leads-club/agent-skills
Finds duplicate business logic spread across multiple components and suggests consolidation. Use when asking "where is this logic duplicated?", "find common…
Detects misplaced classes and fixes component hierarchy problems — finds code that should belong inside a component but sits at the root level. Use when asking…
Maps architectural components in a codebase and measures their size to identify what should be extracted first. Use when asking "how big is each module?",…
Analyzes coupling between modules using the three-dimensional model (strength, distance, volatility) from "Balancing Coupling in Software Design". Use when…
Creates step-by-step decomposition plans and migration roadmaps for breaking apart monolithic applications. Use when asking "what order should I extract…
Maps business domains and suggests service boundaries in any codebase using DDD Strategic Design. Use when asking "what are the domains in this codebase?",…