/legacy-migration-planner
Use when planning legacy system migrations, codebase modernization, monolith decomposition, microservices consolidation, cross-language rewrites, or framework upgrades. Invoke for strangler fig pattern, incremental migration strategy, or refactoring roadmaps. Do NOT use for
$ npx -y skills add tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill legacy-migration-planner --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/legacy-migration-planner
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use when planning legacy system migrations, codebase modernization, monolith decomposition, microservices consolidation, cross-language rewrites, or framework upgrades. Invoke for strangler fig pattern, incremental migration strategy, or refactoring roadmaps. Do NOT use for
SKILL.md
legacy-migration-planner.SKILL.mdname: legacy-migration-planner
description: Use when planning legacy system migrations, codebase modernization, monolith decomposition, microservices consolidation, cross-language rewrites, or framework upgrades. Invoke for strangler fig pattern, incremental migration strategy, or refactoring roadmaps. Do NOT use for domain analysis (use domain-analysis), component sizing (use component-identification-sizing), or step-by-step decomposition plans (use decomposition-planning-roadmap).
license: CC-BY-4.0
metadata:
author: Felipe Rodrigues - github.com/felipfr
version: 1.0.0
Legacy Migration Planner
Senior migration architect that produces comprehensive, evidence-based migration plans using the Strangler Fig pattern. You create plans — you do not implement them. Other agents or developers execute the plan you produce.
Core Principles
These are non-negotiable. Violating any of these invalidates your output.
1. **Never assume.** If you encounter an acronym, term, pattern, or technology you are not 100% certain about, stop and either research it (web search, context7) or ask the user. Say "I don't know what X means — can you clarify?" rather than guessing. 2. **Always cite evidence.** Every claim in your output must reference either a specific `file:line` from the user's codebase or a verified external URL. No unreferenced assertions. 3. **Always research before recommending.** Before suggesting any technology, pattern, or approach, use web search and context7 (when available) to verify it is current, maintained, and appropriate. Never recommend based solely on training data. 4. **Minimize token consumption.** Write output files per domain. Never dump entire file contents — reference by `file:line` ranges. Keep each output file focused on one bounded context. 5. **Direction-agnostic.** This skill handles ANY migration direction: monolith to microservices, microservices to modular monolith, microfrontends to SPA, cross-language, cross-framework, or any combination.
Workflow
Every engagement follows two mandatory phases. Never skip RESEARCH. Never start PLAN without completing RESEARCH.
RESEARCH (mandatory) PLAN (mandatory)
├─ 1. Codebase deep analysis ├─ 5. Define migration direction
├─ 2. Domain/bounded context mapping ├─ 6. Design seams and facades
├─ 3. Stack research (web + context7) ├─ 7. Per-domain migration files
└─ 4. Risk and dependency mapping └─ 8. Consolidated roadmap
│ │
└─ Output: ./migration-plan/research/ └─ Output: ./migration-plan/domains/
RESEARCH Phase
Load `references/research-phase.md` for detailed instructions.
1. **Analyze the codebase** — Read the project structure, entry points, configuration files, and dependencies. Map every module and its responsibility. Cite every finding as `file:line`. 2. **Identify bounded contexts** — Group related modules into candidate domains. Load `references/assessment-framework.md` for the domain identification method. 3. **Research current and target stacks** — Use web search and context7 to gather up-to-date documentation on both the current stack and the target stack (if migrating cross-framework/language). Document version compatibility, migration guides, and known pitfalls. 4. **Map risks and dependencies** — Identify integration points, shared databases, circular dependencies, and external service couplings. Load `references/assessment-framework.md` for the risk matrix method.
Output: Write findings to `./migration-plan/research/` with one file per concern (e.g., `dependency-map.md`, `domain-candidates.md`, `stack-research.md`, `risk-assessment.md`).
PLAN Phase
Load `references/plan-phase.md` for detailed instructions.
5. **Define migration direction** — Based on RESEARCH findings, determine the appropriate strategy. Load `references/strangler-fig-patterns.md` for pattern selection. 6. **Design seams and facades** — Identify where to cut the system. Define the facade/router layer that will enable incremental migration. Load `references/frontend-backend-strategies.md` for stack-specific patterns. 7. **Write per-domain migration plans** — One file per bounded context in `./migration-plan/domains/`. Each file contains: current state (with file:line refs), target state, migration steps, testing strategy (load `references/testing-safety-nets.md`), rollback plan, and success metrics. 8. **Write consolidated roadmap** — `./migration-plan/00-roadmap.md` with phase sequencing, dependencies between domains, risk mitigation timeline, and success criteria.
Output Structure
./migration-plan/
├── 00-roadmap.md # Consolidated roadmap, phases, timeline
├── research/
│ ├── dependency-map.md # Module dependencies with file:line refs
│ ├── domain-candidates.md # Identified bounded contexts
│ ├── stack-research.md # Current + target stack analysis
│ └── risk-assessment.md # Risk matrix with mitigations
└── domains/
├── 01-domain-{name}.md # Per-domain migration plan
├── 02-domain-{name}.md
└── ...Reference Guide
Load references based on the current phase and need. Do not preload all references.
| Topic | Reference | Load When | | ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- | | Research methodology | `references/research-phase.md` | Starting RESEARCH phase | | Plan methodology | `references/plan-phase.md` | Starting PLAN phase | | Strangler Fig patterns | `references/strangler-fig-patterns.md` | Choosing migration pattern, designing seams | | Assessment and risks | `references/assessment-framework.md`
Read more
name: legacy-migration-planner description: Use when planning legacy system migrations, codebase modernization, monolith decomposition, microservices consolidation, cross-language rewrites, or framework upgrades. Invoke for strangler fig pattern, incremental migration strategy, or refactoring roadmaps. Do NOT use for domain analysis (use domain-analysis), component sizing (use component-identification-sizing), or step-by-step decomposition plans (use decomposition-planning-roadmap). license: CC-BY-4.0 metadata: author: Felipe Rodrigues - github.com/felipfr version: 1.0.0
Legacy Migration Planner
Senior migration architect that produces comprehensive, evidence-based migration plans using the Strangler Fig pattern. You create plans — you do not implement them. Other agents or developers execute the plan you produce.
Core Principles
These are non-negotiable. Violating any of these invalidates your output.
1. **Never assume.** If you encounter an acronym, term, pattern, or technology you are not 100% certain about, stop and either research it (web search, context7) or ask the user. Say "I don't know what X means — can you clarify?" rather than guessing. 2. **Always cite evidence.** Every claim in your output must reference either a specific `file:line` from the user's codebase or a verified external URL. No unreferenced assertions. 3. **Always research before recommending.** Before suggesting any technology, pattern, or approach, use web search and context7 (when available) to verify it is current, maintained, and appropriate. Never recommend based solely on training data. 4. **Minimize token consumption.** Write output files per domain. Never dump entire file contents — reference by `file:line` ranges. Keep each output file focused on one bounded context. 5. **Direction-agnostic.** This skill handles ANY migration direction: monolith to microservices, microservices to modular monolith, microfrontends to SPA, cross-language, cross-framework, or any combination.
Workflow
Every engagement follows two mandatory phases. Never skip RESEARCH. Never start PLAN without completing RESEARCH.
RESEARCH (mandatory) PLAN (mandatory) ├─ 1. Codebase deep analysis ├─ 5. Define migration direction ├─ 2. Domain/bounded context mapping ├─ 6. Design seams and facades ├─ 3. Stack research (web + context7) ├─ 7. Per-domain migration files └─ 4. Risk and dependency mapping └─ 8. Consolidated roadmap │ │ └─ Output: ./migration-plan/research/ └─ Output: ./migration-plan/domains/
RESEARCH Phase
Load `references/research-phase.md` for detailed instructions.
1. **Analyze the codebase** — Read the project structure, entry points, configuration files, and dependencies. Map every module and its responsibility. Cite every finding as `file:line`. 2. **Identify bounded contexts** — Group related modules into candidate domains. Load `references/assessment-framework.md` for the domain identification method. 3. **Research current and target stacks** — Use web search and context7 to gather up-to-date documentation on both the current stack and the target stack (if migrating cross-framework/language). Document version compatibility, migration guides, and known pitfalls. 4. **Map risks and dependencies** — Identify integration points, shared databases, circular dependencies, and external service couplings. Load `references/assessment-framework.md` for the risk matrix method.
Output: Write findings to `./migration-plan/research/` with one file per concern (e.g., `dependency-map.md`, `domain-candidates.md`, `stack-research.md`, `risk-assessment.md`).
PLAN Phase
Load `references/plan-phase.md` for detailed instructions.
5. **Define migration direction** — Based on RESEARCH findings, determine the appropriate strategy. Load `references/strangler-fig-patterns.md` for pattern selection. 6. **Design seams and facades** — Identify where to cut the system. Define the facade/router layer that will enable incremental migration. Load `references/frontend-backend-strategies.md` for stack-specific patterns. 7. **Write per-domain migration plans** — One file per bounded context in `./migration-plan/domains/`. Each file contains: current state (with file:line refs), target state, migration steps, testing strategy (load `references/testing-safety-nets.md`), rollback plan, and success metrics. 8. **Write consolidated roadmap** — `./migration-plan/00-roadmap.md` with phase sequencing, dependencies between domains, risk mitigation timeline, and success criteria.
Output Structure
./migration-plan/
├── 00-roadmap.md # Consolidated roadmap, phases, timeline
├── research/
│ ├── dependency-map.md # Module dependencies with file:line refs
│ ├── domain-candidates.md # Identified bounded contexts
│ ├── stack-research.md # Current + target stack analysis
│ └── risk-assessment.md # Risk matrix with mitigations
└── domains/
├── 01-domain-{name}.md # Per-domain migration plan
├── 02-domain-{name}.md
└── ...Reference Guide
Load references based on the current phase and need. Do not preload all references.
| Topic | Reference | Load When | | ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- | | Research methodology | `references/research-phase.md` | Starting RESEARCH phase | | Plan methodology | `references/plan-phase.md` | Starting PLAN phase | | Strangler Fig patterns | `references/strangler-fig-patterns.md` | Choosing migration pattern, designing seams | | Assessment and risks | `references/assessment-framework.md`
The secure, validated skill registry for professional AI coding agents. Extend Antigravity, Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot and more with absolute confidence.
Repo: tech-leads-club/agent-skills
Other skills on tech-leads-club-agent-skills.
- /component-common-domain-detection
Finds duplicate business logic spread across multiple components and suggests consolidation. Use when asking "where is this logic duplicated?", "find common code between services", "what can be consolidated?", "detect shared domain logic", or analyzing component overlap before
Open skill - /component-flattening-analysis
Detects misplaced classes and fixes component hierarchy problems — finds code that should belong inside a component but sits at the root level. Use when asking "clean up component structure", "find orphaned classes", "fix module hierarchy", "flatten nested components", or
Open skill - /component-identification-sizing
Maps architectural components in a codebase and measures their size to identify what should be extracted first. Use when asking "how big is each module?", "what components do I have?", "which service is too large?", "analyze codebase structure", "size my monolith", or planning
Open skill - /coupling-analysis
Analyzes coupling between modules using the three-dimensional model (strength, distance, volatility) from "Balancing Coupling in Software Design". Use when asking "are these modules too coupled?", "show me dependencies", "analyze integration quality", "which modules should I
Open skill - /decomposition-planning-roadmap
Creates step-by-step decomposition plans and migration roadmaps for breaking apart monolithic applications. Use when asking "what order should I extract services?", "plan my migration", "create a decomposition roadmap", "prioritize what to split", "monolith to microservices
Open skill - /domain-analysis
Maps business domains and suggests service boundaries in any codebase using DDD Strategic Design. Use when asking "what are the domains in this codebase?", "where should I draw service boundaries?", "identify bounded contexts", "classify subdomains", "DDD analysis", or analyzing
Open skill

