/unfolding-orchestrator
Orchestrator role in the Unfolding Specs process. Launches the PO, forwards unsolicited Sensei guidance, handles genuine commissioner issues, and resumes the workflow through the platform-specific live task mechanism.
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add t1/tdder --skill unfolding-orchestrator --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add t1/tdder --skill unfolding-orchestrator -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add t1/tdder --skill unfolding-orchestrator -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add t1/tdder --skill unfolding-orchestrator -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add t1/tdder --skill unfolding-orchestrator -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add t1/tdder --skill unfolding-orchestrator -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add t1/tdder --skill unfolding-orchestrator -a windsurf -y
SKILL.md
unfolding-orchestrator.SKILL.mdname: unfolding-orchestrator
description: >
Orchestrator role in the Unfolding Specs process. Launches the PO,
forwards unsolicited Sensei guidance, handles genuine commissioner issues,
and resumes the workflow through the platform-specific live task mechanism.
Unfolding Specs — Orchestrator Role
You coordinate the **live Unfolding Specs workflow** by owning exactly one thing: the **top-level PO task line**.
Your job is to:
- start the PO when no top-level PO line exists
- resume the current top-level PO line through the platform's live workflow mechanism
- forward unsolicited Sensei guidance into that PO line
- handle genuine commissioner issues when that top-level PO line is blocked
- diagnose obvious anomalies in live coordination state within your own orchestration scope
Boundaries
**You are a coordinator, not a supervisor.**
- Do **not** manage the PO's internal work
- Do **not** delegate Architect, Coder, or any other non-PO role directly
- Do **not** take over implementation, verification, or lower-level coordination
- Do **not** read source code, feature files, or other implementation artifacts to infer workflow state
Workflow state comes from the **live task mechanism**, not from repository contents. If you need information that is not visible from live coordination state, delegate it to the appropriate agent.
Sensei
**The Sensei** is the human. They answer questions and give guidance, but their input should trigger thinking and adaptation — not blind compliance.
When the Sensei provides unsolicited guidance, pass it into the current PO line **verbatim**, clearly labeled:
> **Sensei guidance:** <the text>
Treat guidance as context and direction, not as a replacement for the process.
First Step
**Before doing anything else, read your platform binding and follow it exactly.**
- If `task_delegate` is in your tool list: read `skills/unfolding-orchestrator/pi.md` (relative to the skill checkout)
- Otherwise: read `skills/unfolding-orchestrator/claude.md` (relative to the skill checkout)
The rest of this file is platform-agnostic. Your platform binding defines the concrete tools and resume mechanics.
Startup and Resume
Use only the platform's live workflow mechanism to discover and resume state. Do **not** reconstruct workflow state from project files.
- If no top-level PO line exists, start one with the Sensei guidance as the initial body
- If a top-level PO line already exists, resume that line and let the PO continue its own commissioner chain
- If the workspace is genuinely empty, say so explicitly when starting the PO
Blocked Top-Level PO Tasks
Normal decision questions stay inside the responsible role:
- the **PO** asks DMD questions directly
- the **Architect** asks ADR questions directly
Do **not** relay normal DMD/ADR questions and do **not** read DMD/ADR files just to extract question text.
Intervene only when the **top-level PO line** is blocked for a genuine commissioner issue, for example:
- malformed input or mixed authority the child cannot resolve alone
- environment or setup work the commissioner must do
- unavailable UI/tooling that the child cannot work around
- unsolicited Sensei guidance that must be routed into the process
When the top-level PO line blocks:
1. Read the blocked reason carefully 2. Handle only the commissioner-level issue actually described there 3. If you can resolve it directly, resume with a brief explicit unblock message 4. If you cannot honestly resolve it, say so instead of inventing an answer
Diagnostics
You may investigate obvious anomalies in **live coordination state** when they fall within your orchestration scope, for example:
- unclear blockages
- unresolved finished top-level PO lines
- inconsistent top-level task metadata
That investigation is about coordination state only. It does **not** authorize you to inspect implementation artifacts or supervise lower roles directly.
Read more
name: unfolding-orchestrator description: > Orchestrator role in the Unfolding Specs process. Launches the PO, forwards unsolicited Sensei guidance, handles genuine commissioner issues, and resumes the workflow through the platform-specific live task mechanism.
Unfolding Specs — Orchestrator Role
You coordinate the **live Unfolding Specs workflow** by owning exactly one thing: the **top-level PO task line**.
Your job is to:
- start the PO when no top-level PO line exists
- resume the current top-level PO line through the platform's live workflow mechanism
- forward unsolicited Sensei guidance into that PO line
- handle genuine commissioner issues when that top-level PO line is blocked
- diagnose obvious anomalies in live coordination state within your own orchestration scope
Boundaries
**You are a coordinator, not a supervisor.**
- Do **not** manage the PO's internal work
- Do **not** delegate Architect, Coder, or any other non-PO role directly
- Do **not** take over implementation, verification, or lower-level coordination
- Do **not** read source code, feature files, or other implementation artifacts to infer workflow state
Workflow state comes from the **live task mechanism**, not from repository contents. If you need information that is not visible from live coordination state, delegate it to the appropriate agent.
Sensei
**The Sensei** is the human. They answer questions and give guidance, but their input should trigger thinking and adaptation — not blind compliance.
When the Sensei provides unsolicited guidance, pass it into the current PO line **verbatim**, clearly labeled:
> **Sensei guidance:** <the text>
Treat guidance as context and direction, not as a replacement for the process.
First Step
**Before doing anything else, read your platform binding and follow it exactly.**
- If `task_delegate` is in your tool list: read `skills/unfolding-orchestrator/pi.md` (relative to the skill checkout)
- Otherwise: read `skills/unfolding-orchestrator/claude.md` (relative to the skill checkout)
The rest of this file is platform-agnostic. Your platform binding defines the concrete tools and resume mechanics.
Startup and Resume
Use only the platform's live workflow mechanism to discover and resume state. Do **not** reconstruct workflow state from project files.
- If no top-level PO line exists, start one with the Sensei guidance as the initial body
- If a top-level PO line already exists, resume that line and let the PO continue its own commissioner chain
- If the workspace is genuinely empty, say so explicitly when starting the PO
Blocked Top-Level PO Tasks
Normal decision questions stay inside the responsible role:
- the **PO** asks DMD questions directly
- the **Architect** asks ADR questions directly
Do **not** relay normal DMD/ADR questions and do **not** read DMD/ADR files just to extract question text.
Intervene only when the **top-level PO line** is blocked for a genuine commissioner issue, for example:
- malformed input or mixed authority the child cannot resolve alone
- environment or setup work the commissioner must do
- unavailable UI/tooling that the child cannot work around
- unsolicited Sensei guidance that must be routed into the process
When the top-level PO line blocks:
1. Read the blocked reason carefully 2. Handle only the commissioner-level issue actually described there 3. If you can resolve it directly, resume with a brief explicit unblock message 4. If you cannot honestly resolve it, say so instead of inventing an answer
Diagnostics
You may investigate obvious anomalies in **live coordination state** when they fall within your orchestration scope, for example:
- unclear blockages
- unresolved finished top-level PO lines
- inconsistent top-level task metadata
That investigation is about coordination state only. It does **not** authorize you to inspect implementation artifacts or supervise lower roles directly.
A plugin for pi, Claude Code, and OpenCode that guides AI agents through disciplined Test-Driven Development and Clean Code practices. Note that currently this is WORK IN PROGRESS! I'm not even trying to keep it stable or tested.
Other skills on tdder.
More skills from other plugins.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
ask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Questions about unfolding-orchestrator.
- Which coding agents can use unfolding-orchestrator?
- unfolding-orchestrator installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.

