/ha-verify
Hope-native completion and verification discipline: map each requirement to current direct evidence, choose the smallest sufficient checks, and distinguish proven, failed, blocked, stale, or unverified claims.
$ npx -y skills add shiwenwen/hope-agent --skill ha-verify --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/ha-verify
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Hope-native completion and verification discipline: map each requirement to current direct evidence, choose the smallest sufficient checks, and distinguish proven, failed, blocked, stale, or unverified claims.
SKILL.md
ha-verify.SKILL.mdname: ha-verify
description: "Hope-native completion and verification discipline: map each requirement to current direct evidence, choose the smallest sufficient checks, and distinguish proven, failed, blocked, stale, or unverified claims."
paths: ["*.rs", "*.ts", "*.tsx", "*.js", "*.jsx", "*.py", "*.go", "*.java", "*.kt", "*.swift", "*.c", "*.cpp", "*.h", "*.rb", "*.php", "*.sh"]
Hope Verify
Verification proves the requested behavior. It is not a list of commands and it does not decide the development order; use `ha-test-strategy` for that.
Build An Evidence Matrix
For each explicit requirement or completion criterion, record:
| Requirement | Direct evidence | Status | Gap | |---|---|---|---| | Expected behavior | test, runtime observation, diff, artifact, or read-back | proven / failed / blocked / unverified | next useful check |
Evidence must be current, attributable to the changed state, and strong enough for the requirement. A compile check cannot prove a UI interaction; a child Agent finishing cannot prove the parent outcome; a generated artifact cannot prove delivery without read-back.
Choose The Smallest Sufficient Check
Follow repository instructions first. Typical order:
1. Inspect the final diff and state transition. 2. Run the focused unit, fixture, command, or reproduction for the changed path. 3. Add integration or E2E only when the contract crosses that boundary. 4. Use manual smoke evidence for visual or environment-dependent behavior. 5. Run full gates only when requested, required by the repository, or justified by a broad closeout.
For long background work, rely on completion injection and use status queries for snapshots. Do not busy-wait.
Interpret Results
- Confirm the command exercised the intended case, not merely that it exited 0.
- Record failures and skipped checks; do not reuse a result from before the last
relevant edit.
- Separate product failure from fixture, environment, credential, and external
service failure.
- Treat deterministic substitutes as substitutes, not as real external proof.
- If evidence is indirect or missing, the requirement remains unverified.
Completion Audit
Before claiming a phase, Goal, or task complete:
1. Re-read the actual request and named plan. 2. Enumerate every required artifact, invariant, gate, and cleanup action. 3. Inspect authoritative current state for each item. 4. Confirm no required work remains and no stale status contradicts closure. 5. State what was proven, what was not run, and any residual risk.
Goal closure remains controlled by the Goal runtime and its evidence/grader contract. This skill may gather evidence but cannot bypass acceptance or close a Goal by assertion.
Repository-Friendly Defaults
- Docs-only: inspect content, references, and whitespace.
- Rust: focused test or `cargo check -p <crate>` during implementation.
- Frontend: targeted component test or repository typecheck.
- Runtime behavior: fixture, local reproduction, logs, DB state, or read-back.
- Push: rely on the repository pre-push gate instead of manually duplicating it.
Smoke Prompts
- "Prove whether this phase is actually complete."
- "Choose the right checks for this fix."
- "Audit the implementation against every roadmap item."
Read more
name: ha-verify description: "Hope-native completion and verification discipline: map each requirement to current direct evidence, choose the smallest sufficient checks, and distinguish proven, failed, blocked, stale, or unverified claims." paths: ["*.rs", "*.ts", "*.tsx", "*.js", "*.jsx", "*.py", "*.go", "*.java", "*.kt", "*.swift", "*.c", "*.cpp", "*.h", "*.rb", "*.php", "*.sh"]
Hope Verify
Verification proves the requested behavior. It is not a list of commands and it does not decide the development order; use `ha-test-strategy` for that.
Build An Evidence Matrix
For each explicit requirement or completion criterion, record:
| Requirement | Direct evidence | Status | Gap | |---|---|---|---| | Expected behavior | test, runtime observation, diff, artifact, or read-back | proven / failed / blocked / unverified | next useful check |
Evidence must be current, attributable to the changed state, and strong enough for the requirement. A compile check cannot prove a UI interaction; a child Agent finishing cannot prove the parent outcome; a generated artifact cannot prove delivery without read-back.
Choose The Smallest Sufficient Check
Follow repository instructions first. Typical order:
1. Inspect the final diff and state transition. 2. Run the focused unit, fixture, command, or reproduction for the changed path. 3. Add integration or E2E only when the contract crosses that boundary. 4. Use manual smoke evidence for visual or environment-dependent behavior. 5. Run full gates only when requested, required by the repository, or justified by a broad closeout.
For long background work, rely on completion injection and use status queries for snapshots. Do not busy-wait.
Interpret Results
- Confirm the command exercised the intended case, not merely that it exited 0.
- Record failures and skipped checks; do not reuse a result from before the last
relevant edit.
- Separate product failure from fixture, environment, credential, and external
service failure.
- Treat deterministic substitutes as substitutes, not as real external proof.
- If evidence is indirect or missing, the requirement remains unverified.
Completion Audit
Before claiming a phase, Goal, or task complete:
1. Re-read the actual request and named plan. 2. Enumerate every required artifact, invariant, gate, and cleanup action. 3. Inspect authoritative current state for each item. 4. Confirm no required work remains and no stale status contradicts closure. 5. State what was proven, what was not run, and any residual risk.
Goal closure remains controlled by the Goal runtime and its evidence/grader contract. This skill may gather evidence but cannot bypass acceptance or close a Goal by assertion.
Repository-Friendly Defaults
- Docs-only: inspect content, references, and whitespace.
- Rust: focused test or `cargo check -p <crate>` during implementation.
- Frontend: targeted component test or repository typecheck.
- Runtime behavior: fixture, local reproduction, logs, DB state, or read-back.
- Push: rely on the repository pre-push gate instead of manually duplicating it.
Smoke Prompts
- "Prove whether this phase is actually complete."
- "Choose the right checks for this fix."
- "Audit the implementation against every roadmap item."
🦭 会记忆、能持续推进目标、会动态编排多 Agent 的跨端桌面 AI 助手,也可服务化常驻 NAS / 云端 | A cross-device desktop AI agent with memory, autonomous goals, dynamic workflows, and headless deployment
Repo: shiwenwen/hope-agent
Other skills on hope-agent.
- /email-draft
Use when the user asks to draft, polish, translate, or reply to an email. Produces a clean draft with subject line, greeting, body, and sign-off, plus a pre-send self-check.
Open skill - /feishu
Use when the user mentions 飞书 / Feishu / Lark workspace operations: docx (云文档) read/write, bitable (多维表格) records / views / dashboards, drive (云盘) upload/download, wiki (知识库) link resolution, approval (审批) instance create/cancel/query, calendar (日历) event create/list/update +
Open skill - /ha-browser
Hope Agent browser automation — the standard `status → tabs → snapshot → act` loop, stale-ref recovery rules, and what to do when login / 2FA / captcha / camera-prompt / dialog blocks progress. Load this skill whenever you reach for the `browser` tool. Trigger on: user asks the
Open skill - /ha-code-review
Hope-native review of uncommitted, staged, commit, branch, or PR changes: discover concrete regressions, independently verify candidates, and report actionable findings first without speculative noise.
Open skill - /ha-coding-common
Hope-native baseline for implementing, fixing, refactoring, and maintaining code: inspect the repository first, protect user changes, keep scope narrow, and finish with direct evidence.
Open skill - /ha-coding-plan
Hope-native implementation planning for non-trivial code changes: ground the plan in repository evidence, order dependencies, name critical files and risks, define verification, then continue execution when allowed.
Open skill

