Skip to content
Development
Skill

/postmortem

Auto-generates a structured postmortem from a completed campaign. Reads the campaign file, telemetry logs, and feature ledger. Produces a documented analysis of what broke, what the safety systems caught, and what patterns emerged. Can also be invoked manually for any incident.

From plugin
citadel
92248 skills7 agents2 MCP
Install
$ npx -y skills add SethGammon/Citadel --skill postmortem --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/postmortem

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Auto-generates a structured postmortem from a completed campaign. Reads the campaign file, telemetry logs, and feature ledger. Produces a documented analysis of what broke, what the safety systems caught, and what patterns emerged. Can also be invoked manually for any incident.

SKILL.md

postmortem.SKILL.md
name: postmortem
license: MIT
description: >-
  Auto-generates a structured postmortem from a completed campaign. Reads the
  campaign file, telemetry logs, and feature ledger. Produces a documented
  analysis of what broke, what the safety systems caught, and what patterns
  emerged. Can also be invoked manually for any incident.
user-invocable: true
auto-trigger: false
trigger_keywords:
  - postmortem
  - retro
  - what broke
  - what happened
  - debrief
effort: medium

/postmortem — Campaign Postmortem Generator

Orientation

**Use when:** A campaign just completed and you want a structured analysis of what broke, what safety systems caught, and what patterns emerged. Also for ad-hoc incident analysis from recent git history.

**Don't use when:** You want to preserve session context for the next conversation (use `/session-handoff`), extract reusable patterns from findings into the knowledge base (use `/learn`), or score and improve quality iteratively (use `/improve`).

When to Use

  • After any Archon campaign completes (Archon should suggest it)
  • After a difficult debugging session
  • When the user says "what just happened" or "what broke"
  • When /do routes "postmortem", "retro", "what broke", "what happened"

Inputs

One of: 1. A campaign file path (.planning/campaigns/*.md) 2. A time range ("last session", "today", "this week") 3. Nothing (reads the most recent completed campaign)

Protocol

Step 1: GATHER

Collect data from all available sources:

**From the campaign file (if it exists):**

  • Direction vs what was actually built (scope drift?)
  • Phase completion timeline (which phases needed rework?)
  • Decision log entries (what architectural choices were made?)
  • Review queue items (what needed human eyes?)
  • Circuit breaker activations (what hit the limit?)
  • Feature ledger (what shipped?)

**From telemetry (.planning/telemetry/):**

  • hook-timing.jsonl: which hooks fired most, any patterns
  • hook-errors.log: what was blocked, what failed, what had parse errors
  • Circuit breaker trips
  • Quality gate violations

**From git history:**

  • Commits during the campaign period
  • Files changed (which areas got the most churn?)
  • Any reverts (what was undone?)
  • Commit message patterns (fix: commits indicate bugs found)

**From the session itself (if no campaign):**

  • Recent tool calls and their outcomes
  • Files edited and errors encountered

Step 2: ANALYZE

Identify patterns across the data:

1. **What broke:** List every failure, error, or unexpected outcome. For each: what happened, what caught it (hook/gate/human/nothing), what it cost (time, rework, tokens).

2. **What the safety systems caught:** Circuit breaker activations, quality gate blocks, anti-pattern warnings, typecheck failures. This is the "invisible value" section — problems prevented.

3. **What drifted:** Compare the campaign direction to what was built. Did scope expand? Did phases get skipped or reordered? Did the architecture change mid-build?

4. **What patterns emerged:** Recurring error types, files that kept needing fixes, phases that took longest, common anti-patterns.

Step 3: PRODUCE

Write to `.planning/postmortems/postmortem-{slug}-{date}.md`:

# Postmortem: {Campaign Name or Session Description}

> Date: {ISO date}
> Campaign: {path to campaign file, or "ad-hoc session"}
> Duration: {time from first to last commit}
> Outcome: {completed | partial | parked}

## Summary
{2-3 sentences: what was attempted, what happened, what the result was}

## What Broke
{Numbered list. For each:}
### {N}. {Short description}
- **What happened:** {the failure}
- **Caught by:** {hook name / quality gate / human / nothing}
- **Cost:** {rework time, files affected, phases repeated}
- **Fix:** {what resolved it}
- **Infrastructure created:** {new hook rule, new anti-pattern, new end condition — or "none needed"}

## What Safety Systems Caught
{Things that WOULD have been problems without the hooks/gates}
| System | What It Caught | Times | Impact Prevented |
|--------|---------------|-------|-----------------|
| {hook/gate name} | {description} | {count} | {what would have happened} |

## Scope Analysis
- **Planned:** {what the campaign direction said}
- **Built:** {what the feature ledger shows}
- **Drift:** {none | minor | significant — with specifics}

## Patterns
{Recurring themes worth watching:}
- {pattern 1}
- {pattern 2}

## Recommendations
{Concrete next actions:}
1. {recommendation — e.g., "Add anti-pattern rule for X"}
2. {recommendation — e.g., "Phase Y needs tighter end conditions"}

## Numbers
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Phases planned | {N} |
| Phases completed | {N} |
| Commits | {N} |
| Files changed | {N} |
| Circuit breaker trips | {N} |
| Quality gate blocks | {N} |
| Anti-pattern warnings | {N} |
| Rework cycles | {N} |

Step 4: HANDOFF

Output the HANDOFF block from the Exit Protocol, then suggest: `Run /learn {campaign-slug} to extract patterns into the knowledge base.`

What /postmortem Does NOT Do

  • Invent failures that didn't happen (real data only)
  • Blame the user or the model (document what happened, not whose fault)
  • Recommend changes to skill files (that's for the user to decide)
  • Run during a campaign (only after completion or on demand)

Quality Gates

  • Every "What Broke" entry has all 5 fields filled
  • Numbers section has real data (not estimates)
  • Recommendations are concrete actions (not "be more careful")
  • If no failures occurred, say so honestly (don't manufacture drama)

Fringe Cases

**Campaign not found**: If the specified campaign file doesn't exist, check `.planning/campaigns/` for the most recently modified campaign. If no campaigns exist, run in ad-hoc mode using recent git history and session context.

**No telemetry data**: Proceed without telemetry. Mark the "What Safety Systems Caught" table as "No telemetry available" and the Numbers section fields as "N/A". Don't manufacture da

Read more
Ships withcitadel

An open-source operating layer for Claude Code and OpenAI Codex. Citadel routes requests, preserves repository state between sessions, coordinates parallel work, applies repository safeguards, and records evidence and handoffs around the coding agent you

Get the whole plugin

Other skills on citadel.