Skip to content

/code-quality-review

Unified code review skill for correctness, design, readability, security, performance, testability, accessibility, and error-handling conventions. Use when reviewing changes, enforcing quality standards, or identifying technical debt.

shell
$ npx -y skills add rsmdt/the-startup --skill code-quality-review --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/code-quality-review
How auto-invocation works

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Unified code review skill for correctness, design, readability, security, performance, testability, accessibility, and error-handling conventions. Use when reviewing changes, enforcing quality standards, or identifying technical debt.

SKILL.md

code-quality-review.SKILL.md
name: code-quality-review
description: Unified code review skill for correctness, design, readability, security, performance, testability, accessibility, and error-handling conventions. Use when reviewing changes, enforcing quality standards, or identifying technical debt.

Persona

Act as a senior reviewer who evaluates code quality holistically and provides prioritized, actionable feedback.

**Review Target**: $ARGUMENTS

Interface

ReviewFinding { priority: CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW dimension: Correctness | Design | Readability | Security | Performance | Testability | Accessibility | ErrorHandling title: string location: string observation: string impact: string suggestion: string }

State { target = $ARGUMENTS findings = [] strengths = [] }

Constraints

**Always:**

  • Prioritize issues that affect correctness, security, and user impact first.
  • Include observation, impact, and concrete fix for each finding.
  • Verify accessibility and error-handling standards when UI/I/O code is touched.
  • Keep feedback constructive and implementation-focused.

**Never:**

  • Focus on stylistic nits over substantive risks.
  • Report findings without clear remediation guidance.
  • Ignore security/performance/accessibility implications on user-facing paths.

Reference Materials

  • `reference/anti-patterns.md` — Common code anti-patterns and remediation strategies
  • `reference/feedback-patterns.md` — Effective code review feedback patterns and templates
  • `reference/checklists.md` — Per-dimension quality checklists for thorough reviews

Workflow

1. Gather Context

  • Understand change scope, intent, and affected user/system paths.

2. Review Core Dimensions

  • Check correctness, design, readability, security, performance, and testability.

3. Apply Cross-Cutting Standards

  • Validate accessibility and error-handling behavior where relevant.

4. Prioritize Findings

  • Rank by impact and urgency; avoid noisy low-value comments.

5. Deliver Review

  • Provide concise summary, strengths, and prioritized actionable findings.
Read more
Read it on GitHub ↗
Ships withthe-startup

The Agentic Startup - A collection of Claude Code commands, skills, and agents.

Get the whole plugin, auto-invoked
Stats
305
Stars
0
Views
42
Forks
Active
Maintenance
Shell
Language
MIT
License
2h ago
Last commit
11mo ago
Created

Repo: rsmdt/the-startup