codex
Run the Codex CLI directly in the user's checkout for code analysis, refactoring, or automated editing without Claude Architect's…
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add pymodel/claude-architect --skill verification-before-completion --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add pymodel/claude-architect --skill verification-before-completion -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add pymodel/claude-architect --skill verification-before-completion -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add pymodel/claude-architect --skill verification-before-completion -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add pymodel/claude-architect --skill verification-before-completion -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add pymodel/claude-architect --skill verification-before-completion -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add pymodel/claude-architect --skill verification-before-completion -a windsurf -y
name: verification-before-completion description: Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
**Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.
**Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.**
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction: 1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim? 2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete) 3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures 4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim? - If NO: State actual status with evidence - If YES: State claim WITH evidence 5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim Skip any step = lying, not verifying
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient | |-------|----------|----------------| | Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" | | Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation | | Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good | | Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed | | Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once | | Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" | | Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
| Excuse | Reality | |--------|---------| | "Should work now" | RUN the verification | | "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence | | "Just this once" | No exceptions | | "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler | | "Agent said success" | Verify independently | | "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse | | "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing | | "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |
**Tests:**
✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass" ❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
**Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):**
✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass) ❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)
**Build:**
✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes" ❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
**Requirements:**
✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion ❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"
**Agent delegation:**
✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state ❌ Trust agent report
**ALWAYS before:**
**Rule applies to:**
Claude Code delegates coding to isolated CLI agents it doesn't trust (Codex, OpenCode, Pi, Pythinker), freezes what they produce, verifies it independently, and merges only what a human approves.
Run the Codex CLI directly in the user's checkout for code analysis, refactoring, or automated editing without Claude Architect's…
Let Claude Architect route a versioned implementation spec through the trusted MCP runtime, independently review the Candidate…
Execute an implementation plan with the Superpowers subagent-driven-development loop while every task is implemented by a…
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.