/design
Run the bottom-up system-design workflow on a problem — clarify, estimate, design with building blocks, weigh trade-offs, stress-test, and diagram. Great for design questions and system-design interview practice.
> /plugin marketplace add proyecto26/system-design-skills > /plugin install system-design-skills@system-design-skills
How it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfClaude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/design
Context preview
What this command does when you run it.
Run the bottom-up system-design workflow on a problem — clarify, estimate, design with building blocks, weigh trade-offs, stress-test, and diagram. Great for design questions and system-design interview practice.
Command definition
design.mddescription: Run the bottom-up system-design workflow on a problem — clarify, estimate, design with building blocks, weigh trade-offs, stress-test, and diagram. Great for design questions and system-design interview practice.
argument-hint: <system to design, e.g. "a URL shortener" or "WhatsApp at 1B users">
allowed-tools: ["Task", "Skill", "Read", "Write", "Glob", "Grep", "Bash"]
Run the system-design process for: **$ARGUMENTS**
Drive this as a collaborative design session using the `system-design-skills` plugin, following the GUIDE reasoning loop. Do not jump to a finished architecture.
1. **Launch the orchestrator.** Use the Task tool to run the `system-design-orchestrator` agent on the problem above. It loads the `system-design` skill (the method) and composes the building-block skills.
- If subagent launch is unavailable, run the loop inline yourself: invoke the `system-design` skill first, then route to building-block skills as each concern arises — invoke each skill, don't paraphrase it. The full catalog (the 20 building blocks, bottom-up layers) is the building-blocks index inside the `system-design` skill; reach for whichever fit, including the less-obvious ones (`service-decomposition`, `dns`, `sequencer`, `blob-store`, `observability`, `distributed-logging`, `distributed-search`, `task-scheduling`, `sharded-counters`) alongside the core (`requirements-scoping`, `back-of-the-envelope`, `api-design`, `data-storage`, `caching`, `load-balancing`, `messaging-streaming`, `consistency-coordination`, `resilience-failure`, `content-delivery`, `scaling-evolution`). For "monolith vs microservices / where are the service boundaries", that is `service-decomposition`.
2. **Work the loop out loud:** clarify requirements (functional / non-functional / out-of-scope) → estimate scale with numbers → propose a high-level design + API → articulate trade-offs (solves / worsens / when-to-change) per major choice → stress-test failure modes → iterate, pivoting the affected part when a constraint changes.
3. **Ask** a clarifying question whenever an answer is load-bearing (consistency model, single vs multi-region, sync vs async) and cannot be assumed safely. Treat the user as a collaborator, not an audience.
4. **Capture & persist** the running design with the `system-design` skill's design-doc template, write the settled artifacts to a file (suggest `docs/design/<system>.md`), and when it stabilizes render it with the `architecture-diagram` skill.
5. **Score, then close.** Rate the design with the quality bar + Quick Diagnostic in the `system-design` skill's `references/failure-modes.md`, state the weakest dimension, then name the current bottleneck and what would change at the next order of magnitude. Never claim the design is perfect.
If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty, ask the user what system they want to design (and at what rough scale) before starting.
Read more
description: Run the bottom-up system-design workflow on a problem — clarify, estimate, design with building blocks, weigh trade-offs, stress-test, and diagram. Great for design questions and system-design interview practice. argument-hint: <system to design, e.g. "a URL shortener" or "WhatsApp at 1B users"> allowed-tools: ["Task", "Skill", "Read", "Write", "Glob", "Grep", "Bash"]
Run the system-design process for: **$ARGUMENTS**
Drive this as a collaborative design session using the `system-design-skills` plugin, following the GUIDE reasoning loop. Do not jump to a finished architecture.
1. **Launch the orchestrator.** Use the Task tool to run the `system-design-orchestrator` agent on the problem above. It loads the `system-design` skill (the method) and composes the building-block skills.
- If subagent launch is unavailable, run the loop inline yourself: invoke the `system-design` skill first, then route to building-block skills as each concern arises — invoke each skill, don't paraphrase it. The full catalog (the 20 building blocks, bottom-up layers) is the building-blocks index inside the `system-design` skill; reach for whichever fit, including the less-obvious ones (`service-decomposition`, `dns`, `sequencer`, `blob-store`, `observability`, `distributed-logging`, `distributed-search`, `task-scheduling`, `sharded-counters`) alongside the core (`requirements-scoping`, `back-of-the-envelope`, `api-design`, `data-storage`, `caching`, `load-balancing`, `messaging-streaming`, `consistency-coordination`, `resilience-failure`, `content-delivery`, `scaling-evolution`). For "monolith vs microservices / where are the service boundaries", that is `service-decomposition`.
2. **Work the loop out loud:** clarify requirements (functional / non-functional / out-of-scope) → estimate scale with numbers → propose a high-level design + API → articulate trade-offs (solves / worsens / when-to-change) per major choice → stress-test failure modes → iterate, pivoting the affected part when a constraint changes.
3. **Ask** a clarifying question whenever an answer is load-bearing (consistency model, single vs multi-region, sync vs async) and cannot be assumed safely. Treat the user as a collaborator, not an audience.
4. **Capture & persist** the running design with the `system-design` skill's design-doc template, write the settled artifacts to a file (suggest `docs/design/<system>.md`), and when it stabilizes render it with the `architecture-diagram` skill.
5. **Score, then close.** Rate the design with the quality bar + Quick Diagnostic in the `system-design` skill's `references/failure-modes.md`, state the weakest dimension, then name the current bottleneck and what would change at the next order of magnitude. Never claim the design is perfect.
If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty, ask the user what system they want to design (and at what rough scale) before starting.
Design scalable systems the way strong engineers actually do — by reasoning, not by memorizing diagrams.
Repo: proyecto26/system-design-skills