Skip to content
Development
Skill

/exploring-llm-traces

Debug and inspect LLM/AI agent traces using PostHog's MCP tools. Use when the user pastes a trace or session URL (e.g. /ai-observability/traces/<id> or /ai-observability/sessions/<id>), asks to debug a trace, figure out what went wrong, check if an agent used a tool correctly,

From plugin
ai-plugin
95180 skills1 agent3 commands3 hooks
+1

Claude Code

$ npx -y skills add PostHog/ai-plugin --skill exploring-llm-traces --agent claude-code

SKILL.md

exploring-llm-traces.SKILL.md
name: exploring-llm-traces
description: >
  Debug and inspect LLM/AI agent traces using PostHog's MCP tools.
  Use when the user pastes a trace or session URL (e.g. /ai-observability/traces/<id> or /ai-observability/sessions/<id>),
  asks to debug a trace, figure out what went wrong, check if an agent used a tool correctly,
  verify context/files were surfaced, inspect subagent behavior, investigate LLM decisions,
  or analyze token usage and costs. Also use when raw SQL/HogQL against
  `events.properties.$ai_input` / `$ai_output_choices` returns empty — message content lives only
  on the dedicated `posthog.ai_events` table.

Exploring LLM traces with MCP tools

PostHog captures LLM/AI agent activity as traces. Each trace is a tree of events representing a single AI interaction — from the top-level agent invocation down to individual LLM API calls.

Available tools

| Tool | Purpose | | ------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | | `posthog:query-llm-traces-list` | Search and list traces; can return large multi-trace payloads | | `posthog:query-llm-trace` | Get a single trace by ID with full event tree | | `posthog:read-data-schema` | Discover custom event/person properties before filtering | | `posthog:execute-sql` | Ad-hoc SQL for complex trace analysis |

Event hierarchy

See the [event reference](./references/events-and-properties.md) for the full schema.

$ai_trace (top-level container)
  └── $ai_span (logical groupings, e.g. "RAG retrieval", "tool execution")
        ├── $ai_generation (individual LLM API call)
        └── $ai_embedding (embedding creation)

Events are linked via `$ai_parent_id` → parent's `$ai_span_id` or `$ai_trace_id`.

Workflow: debug a trace or session from a URL

Step 1 — Classify the URL

First inspect the path. Do not treat every UUID-looking value as a trace ID.

  • `/ai-observability/traces/<trace_id>` or legacy `/llm-analytics/traces/<trace_id>` / `/llm-observability/traces/<trace_id>` is a single trace. Fetch it with `posthog:query-llm-trace`.
  • `/ai-observability/sessions/<session_id>` or legacy `/llm-analytics/sessions/<session_id>` is an AI session, not a trace. Fetch traces with `posthog:query-llm-traces-list` filtered by event property `$ai_session_id`.

Preserve `date_from` / `date_to` query parameters from the URL when present. If none are present but the URL has a `timestamp` query parameter, use that timestamp as the anchor and query an absolute window around it, for example `timestamp - 36h` to `timestamp + 36h`. This handles exact session links whose UI timestamp may be offset from the stored event timestamps while keeping the query bounded. If the URL has neither explicit dates nor `timestamp`, use a safe default like `{"date_from": "-7d"}`.

For exact trace and session URLs, skip schema discovery for the standard `$ai_*` fields used below. These are AI observability built-ins, not project-specific custom properties.

Step 2 — Browse trace summaries

Explicitly set `detail: "summary"` when browsing traces. This returns event metadata and leaves the conversation content out, so browsing does not spend context on prompts and outputs. Omitting `detail` still returns full detail for compatibility with existing callers.

For a trace URL, call `posthog:query-llm-trace` with:

{
  "traceId": "<trace_id>",
  "detail": "summary",
  "dateRange": { "date_from": "-7d" }
}

For a session URL, call `posthog:query-llm-traces-list` with:

{
  "detail": "summary",
  "dateRange": { "date_from": "<timestamp_minus_36h>", "date_to": "<timestamp_plus_36h>" },
  "filterTestAccounts": false,
  "limit": 20,
  "properties": [{ "type": "event", "key": "$ai_session_id", "value": ["<session_id>"], "operator": "exact" }]
}

Use the URL's `date_from` / `date_to` values in the session query if present. If the URL only has `timestamp`, calculate the absolute date range from that timestamp instead of using a relative range like `-1h`. Set `filterTestAccounts: false` for an exact URL so the requested trace is not hidden by account filters.

The result contains trace and event metadata only. Prompts, outputs, span states, `$ai_error` and `$ai_feedback_text` are left out, and their names are listed in `_summaryOmittedKeys` beside the property bag. A trace with `_detail: { "mode": "summary" }` carries no conversation content at all. Read the content with `detail: "full"`.

From the result you get:

  • Every event with its type (`$ai_span`, `$ai_generation`, etc.)
  • Span names (`$ai_span_name`) — these are the tool/step names
  • Latency, error flags, models used
  • Parent-child relationships via `$ai_parent_id`
  • `_posthogUrl` — **always include this in your response** so the user can click through to the UI

Step 3 — Read the content needed for the investigation

Once you have selected a trace, request `posthog:query-llm-trace` with `detail: "full"` before inspecting exact tool arguments, checking which context the model received, or searching conversation content:

{
  "traceId": "<trace_id>",
  "detail": "full",
  "dateRange": { "date_from": "-7d" }
}

Preserve the date range from the original URL or discovery query instead of copying the example range. Keep relevant property filters to narrow the read. If the user already identified the trace and needs exact content, you can request full detail directly.

Both modes enforce response size limits. Check the omission and truncation markers before drawing conclusions. A dropped event, a name listed in `_summaryOmittedKeys` or `_redactedKeys`, or a keyword missing from a summary is not evidence that it was absent from the trace. If full detail is still truncated, narrow the query to the relevant events or open `_posthogUrl` for the complete data. Both detail

Read more
@posthog
Ships withai-plugin

Official PostHog plugin for AI clients. Access PostHog products directly from your AI coding tool.

95180 skills1 agent1 MCP
Get the whole plugin

Stars on GitHub

Momentum

stars in total
95
Star history of PostHog/ai-plugin on GitHub, a chart by star-history.com

Other skills on ai-plugin.

analyzing-ai-citations

analyzing-ai-citations

Answer AI citation and answer engine optimization (AEO) questions in PostHog: whether AI answer engines (ChatGPT, Claude, and an…

@posthog@posthogInstall Skill

More skills from other plugins.

brainstorming
Auto-invoked

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…

@obra@obraInstall Skill
ask-matt

ask-matt

Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.

skills10d309k
@mattpocock@mattpocockInstall Skill
accessibility
Auto-invoked

accessibility

Design, implement, and audit accessible UI to WCAG 2.2 Level AA across Web, iOS, and Android — semantic ARIA roles and labels,…

ecc12d293k
@affaan-m@affaan-mInstall Skill
compiler-commit

compiler-commit

Use when you want to verify compiler changes and commit with the correct convention. Runs tests, lint, and format, then commits…

react1d252k
@facebook@facebookInstall Skill

Questions about exploring-llm-traces.

Which coding agents can use exploring-llm-traces?
exploring-llm-traces installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.