/authoring-log-alerts
Author useful, low-noise log alerts on services in a PostHog project. Use when the user asks to set up alerts for their logs, suggest alerts they should add, or evaluate whether a service is worth monitoring. Covers service triage, baseline characterisation, threshold drafting,
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add PostHog/ai-plugin --skill authoring-log-alerts --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add PostHog/ai-plugin --skill authoring-log-alerts -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add PostHog/ai-plugin --skill authoring-log-alerts -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add PostHog/ai-plugin --skill authoring-log-alerts -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add PostHog/ai-plugin --skill authoring-log-alerts -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add PostHog/ai-plugin --skill authoring-log-alerts -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add PostHog/ai-plugin --skill authoring-log-alerts -a windsurf -y
SKILL.md
authoring-log-alerts.SKILL.mdname: authoring-log-alerts
description: >
Author useful, low-noise log alerts on services in a PostHog project. Use when the user asks to set up
alerts for their logs, suggest alerts they should add, or evaluate whether a service is worth monitoring.
Covers service triage, baseline characterisation, threshold drafting, back-testing via simulate, and
shipping with a notification destination.
Authoring log alerts
Authoring an alert is a _measurement_ problem, not a guessing problem. You are not trying to be exhaustive — you are trying to land thresholds that fire 0–3 times per week on real production patterns, on services that matter.
When to use this skill
- The user asks to "set up alerts" / "suggest alerts" for their project.
- The user wants to evaluate whether a service is producing alertable signal.
- The user has just enabled log alerting and wants a starter set.
When _not_ to use this skill
- Tuning an alert that already exists — that's a different job (use `posthog:logs-alerts-events-list` to inspect
fire/resolve cadence and `posthog:logs-alerts-partial-update` to adjust).
- Investigating an active incident — pull rows with `posthog:query-logs`, don't author an alert mid-incident.
Tools
| Tool | Job | Where it fits | | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | | `posthog:logs-services` | Top-25 services in window with log_count, error_count, error_rate, sparkline. | Step 1 — triage. | | `posthog:logs-attributes-list` / `posthog:logs-attribute-values-list` | Discover keys/values for narrower filters. | Step 2, optional. | | `posthog:logs-count-ranges` | Adaptive time-bucketed counts for a filter. | Step 3 — baseline. | | `posthog:logs-alerts-simulate-create` | Replay a draft config against `-7d` history with full state machine. | Step 4 — validate. | | `posthog:logs-alerts-create` | Persist the alert. | Step 5 — ship. | | `posthog:logs-alerts-destinations-create` | Wire the alert to Slack, webhook, or Microsoft Teams. | Step 5: ship. |
Do **not** call `posthog:query-logs` during authoring. You need distributions, not rows. Reserve `posthog:query-logs` for the very end if the user asks "show me a sample of what would have fired" — `limit: 10` is plenty.
Workflow
1. Triage — pick candidate services
Call `posthog:logs-services` for the last 24h with no filters. The response is capped at 25 services and includes a sparkline, so it is small and bounded.
A service is a candidate when **both** are true:
- `log_count` is non-trivial (≥ ~1k in 24h — quieter services produce too little signal to alert on).
- `error_rate` is non-zero, **or** the user has named the service explicitly.
Skip services with high volume but `error_rate == 0` unless the user wants a volume-shape alert (e.g. "warn me if api-gateway suddenly stops producing logs"). Volume-floor alerts use `threshold_operator: below` and need different reasoning — see [references/volume-floor-alerts.md](./references/volume-floor-alerts.md).
If the user names a service, treat it as a candidate even without error signal.
2. (Optional) Narrow the filter
If a service has many error sub-types, an alert on "all errors" is usually too broad. Use `posthog:logs-attributes-list` (try `attribute_type: log`) and `posthog:logs-attribute-values-list` to find a discriminator — common ones are `http.status_code`, `error.type`, `k8s.container.name`. Add the narrowing filter to your draft.
Keep it simple: one severity filter + one or two attribute filters is plenty. Multi-clause filters are harder to reason about and rarely improve precision.
3. Baseline — characterise the candidate over 7 days
Call `posthog:logs-count-ranges` with the candidate's filters, `dateRange: { date_from: "-7d" }`, and `targetBuckets: 24` (one bucket ≈ 7h). The response gives you bucket counts.
**Do not eyeball the percentiles or scale the threshold to the alert window manually.** Pipe the count-ranges response into the helper script:
echo '<count-ranges JSON>' | python3 scripts/baseline_stats.py --window-minutes 5
The script returns:
{
"n_buckets": 12,
"bucket_minutes": 420.0,
"alert_window_minutes": 5,
"stats": { "p50": 12.0, "p95": 71.25, "p99": 126.25, "max": 140 },
"suggested_threshold_count": 5,
"rationale": "max(p99=126.25, median*3=36.0, floor=5) scaled from 420m bucket to 5m window",
"health": []
}Use `suggested_threshold_count` as your starting threshold. Read `health`:
| `health` flag | What it means | What to do | | ----------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | `sparse:N_of_M_buckets` | Too few non-empty buckets for a 7d baseline. | Widen filter, extend to `-30d`, or skip. | | `empty` | All buckets are zero. | Skip — no signal. | | `spiky` | `max` is 10×+ `p95`. | Count-threshold alerts work well. Proceed.
Read more
name: authoring-log-alerts description: > Author useful, low-noise log alerts on services in a PostHog project. Use when the user asks to set up alerts for their logs, suggest alerts they should add, or evaluate whether a service is worth monitoring. Covers service triage, baseline characterisation, threshold drafting, back-testing via simulate, and shipping with a notification destination.
Authoring log alerts
Authoring an alert is a _measurement_ problem, not a guessing problem. You are not trying to be exhaustive — you are trying to land thresholds that fire 0–3 times per week on real production patterns, on services that matter.
When to use this skill
- The user asks to "set up alerts" / "suggest alerts" for their project.
- The user wants to evaluate whether a service is producing alertable signal.
- The user has just enabled log alerting and wants a starter set.
When _not_ to use this skill
- Tuning an alert that already exists — that's a different job (use `posthog:logs-alerts-events-list` to inspect
fire/resolve cadence and `posthog:logs-alerts-partial-update` to adjust).
- Investigating an active incident — pull rows with `posthog:query-logs`, don't author an alert mid-incident.
Tools
| Tool | Job | Where it fits | | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | | `posthog:logs-services` | Top-25 services in window with log_count, error_count, error_rate, sparkline. | Step 1 — triage. | | `posthog:logs-attributes-list` / `posthog:logs-attribute-values-list` | Discover keys/values for narrower filters. | Step 2, optional. | | `posthog:logs-count-ranges` | Adaptive time-bucketed counts for a filter. | Step 3 — baseline. | | `posthog:logs-alerts-simulate-create` | Replay a draft config against `-7d` history with full state machine. | Step 4 — validate. | | `posthog:logs-alerts-create` | Persist the alert. | Step 5 — ship. | | `posthog:logs-alerts-destinations-create` | Wire the alert to Slack, webhook, or Microsoft Teams. | Step 5: ship. |
Do **not** call `posthog:query-logs` during authoring. You need distributions, not rows. Reserve `posthog:query-logs` for the very end if the user asks "show me a sample of what would have fired" — `limit: 10` is plenty.
Workflow
1. Triage — pick candidate services
Call `posthog:logs-services` for the last 24h with no filters. The response is capped at 25 services and includes a sparkline, so it is small and bounded.
A service is a candidate when **both** are true:
- `log_count` is non-trivial (≥ ~1k in 24h — quieter services produce too little signal to alert on).
- `error_rate` is non-zero, **or** the user has named the service explicitly.
Skip services with high volume but `error_rate == 0` unless the user wants a volume-shape alert (e.g. "warn me if api-gateway suddenly stops producing logs"). Volume-floor alerts use `threshold_operator: below` and need different reasoning — see [references/volume-floor-alerts.md](./references/volume-floor-alerts.md).
If the user names a service, treat it as a candidate even without error signal.
2. (Optional) Narrow the filter
If a service has many error sub-types, an alert on "all errors" is usually too broad. Use `posthog:logs-attributes-list` (try `attribute_type: log`) and `posthog:logs-attribute-values-list` to find a discriminator — common ones are `http.status_code`, `error.type`, `k8s.container.name`. Add the narrowing filter to your draft.
Keep it simple: one severity filter + one or two attribute filters is plenty. Multi-clause filters are harder to reason about and rarely improve precision.
3. Baseline — characterise the candidate over 7 days
Call `posthog:logs-count-ranges` with the candidate's filters, `dateRange: { date_from: "-7d" }`, and `targetBuckets: 24` (one bucket ≈ 7h). The response gives you bucket counts.
**Do not eyeball the percentiles or scale the threshold to the alert window manually.** Pipe the count-ranges response into the helper script:
echo '<count-ranges JSON>' | python3 scripts/baseline_stats.py --window-minutes 5
The script returns:
{
"n_buckets": 12,
"bucket_minutes": 420.0,
"alert_window_minutes": 5,
"stats": { "p50": 12.0, "p95": 71.25, "p99": 126.25, "max": 140 },
"suggested_threshold_count": 5,
"rationale": "max(p99=126.25, median*3=36.0, floor=5) scaled from 420m bucket to 5m window",
"health": []
}Use `suggested_threshold_count` as your starting threshold. Read `health`:
| `health` flag | What it means | What to do | | ----------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | `sparse:N_of_M_buckets` | Too few non-empty buckets for a 7d baseline. | Widen filter, extend to `-30d`, or skip. | | `empty` | All buckets are zero. | Skip — no signal. | | `spiky` | `max` is 10×+ `p95`. | Count-threshold alerts work well. Proceed.
Official PostHog plugin for AI clients. Access PostHog products directly from your AI coding tool.
Other skills on ai-plugin.
More skills from other plugins.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
ask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Questions about authoring-log-alerts.
- Which coding agents can use authoring-log-alerts?
- authoring-log-alerts installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.

