ask-codex
Consult Codex as an independent expert. Sends a question or task to codex exec and returns the response.
Refine an annotated implementation plan into a comment-free plan and a QA ledger while preserving the gen-plan schema.
$ npx -y skills add PolyArch/humanize --skill humanize-refine-plan --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/humanize-refine-planContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Refine an annotated implementation plan into a comment-free plan and a QA ledger while preserving the gen-plan schema.
name: humanize-refine-plan description: Refine an annotated implementation plan into a comment-free plan and a QA ledger while preserving the gen-plan schema. type: flow user-invocable: false
Refines an annotated plan that contains `CMT:` / `ENDCMT` blocks into a comment-free plan plus a QA ledger, while preserving the `gen-plan` structure and convergence state.
The installer hydrates this skill with an absolute runtime root path:
{{HUMANIZE_RUNTIME_ROOT}}flowchart TD
BEGIN([BEGIN]) --> SETUP[Parse arguments and derive paths<br/>Resolve mode, output path, QA path, alt-language]
SETUP --> LOAD_CFG[Load merged config<br/>Reuse humanize config precedence and defaults]
LOAD_CFG --> VALIDATE[Validate IO<br/>Run: {{HUMANIZE_RUNTIME_ROOT}}/scripts/validate-refine-plan-io.sh --input <annotated-plan> [--output ...] [--qa-dir ...] [--discussion|--direct]]
VALIDATE --> VALID_OK{Validation passed?}
VALID_OK -->|No| REPORT_VALIDATION[Report validation error<br/>Stop]
REPORT_VALIDATION --> END_FAIL([END])
VALID_OK --> EXTRACT[Read input plan and extract valid<br/>CMT:/ENDCMT blocks with a stateful scanner]
EXTRACT --> PARSE_OK{Parse succeeded?}
PARSE_OK -->|No| REPORT_PARSE[Report parse error with<br/>line, column, heading, context<br/>Stop]
REPORT_PARSE --> END_FAIL
PARSE_OK --> CLASSIFY[Classify comments:<br/>question, change_request, research_request]
CLASSIFY --> AMBIG{Ambiguous comments?}
AMBIG -->|Yes, discussion mode| ASK_USER[Ask the minimum user question<br/>needed to continue]
ASK_USER --> PROCESS
AMBIG -->|No| PROCESS[Process comments in order:<br/>answer, refine plan, or do targeted repo research]
PROCESS --> REFINE[Generate refined plan text<br/>Keep required gen-plan sections intact]
REFINE --> PLAN_CHECK{Plan still valid?<br/>No CMT markers, references consistent,<br/>routing tags valid}
PLAN_CHECK -->|No, fixable| FIX[Repair internal inconsistencies]
FIX --> PLAN_CHECK
PLAN_CHECK -->|No, blocking| REPORT_BLOCK[Report blocking inconsistency<br/>Stop]
REPORT_BLOCK --> END_FAIL
PLAN_CHECK -->|Yes| QA[Populate QA document from<br/>{{HUMANIZE_RUNTIME_ROOT}}/prompt-template/plan/refine-plan-qa-template.md]
QA --> ALT_LANG{Generate translated variants?}
ALT_LANG -->|Yes| VARIANTS[Translate refined plan and QA<br/>Keep identifiers unchanged]
ALT_LANG -->|No| ATOMIC
VARIANTS --> ATOMIC[Write refined plan, QA, and variants<br/>atomically via temp files]
ATOMIC --> REPORT_SUCCESS[Report success:<br/>paths, counts, mode, convergence status]
REPORT_SUCCESS --> END_SUCCESS([END])**Required Arguments:**
**Optional Arguments:**
**Argument Rules:**
The refinement flow must:
Each extracted raw comment block receives one dominant classification:
The flow produces:
`--alt-language` supports these normalized values:
| Language | Code | Variant Suffix | |----------|------|----------------| | Chinese | `zh` | `_zh` | | Korean | `ko` | `_ko` | | Japanese | `ja` | `_ja` | | Spanish | `es` | `_es` | | French | `fr` | `_fr` | | German | `de` | `_de` | | Portuguese | `pt` | `_pt` | | Russian | `ru` | `_ru` | | Arabic | `ar` | `_ar` |
Rules:
| Exit Code | Meaning | |-----------|---------| | 0 | Success - continue | | 1 | Input file not found | | 2 | Input file is empty | | 3 | Input file has no `CMT:` blocks | | 4 | Input file is missing required `gen-plan` sections | | 5 | Output directory does not exist or is not writable | | 6 | QA directory is not writable | | 7 | Invalid arguments |
# Start the
Derived from the GAAC (GitHub-as-a-Context) project. A Claude Code plugin that provides iterative development with independent AI review. Build with confidence through continuous feedback loops.
Consult Codex as an independent expert. Sends a question or task to codex exec and returns the response.
Consult Gemini as an independent expert with deep web research. Sends a question or task to Gemini CLI and returns a research-backed response.
Generate a structured implementation plan from a draft document. Validates input, checks relevance, analyzes for issues, and generates a complete plan.md with…
Start RLCR (Ralph-Loop with Codex Review) on Codex using the native Stop hook.