Skip to content
Development
Skill

/explore

Meta-skill for internal codebase exploration at varying depths (quick/deep/architecture)

From plugin
continuous-claude-v3
3.9k156 skills32 agents

Claude Code

$ npx -y skills add parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 --skill explore --agent claude-code

SKILL.md

explore.SKILL.md
name: explore
description: Meta-skill for internal codebase exploration at varying depths (quick/deep/architecture)
allowed-tools: [Bash, Task, Read, Glob, Grep, Write]
keywords: [explore, codebase, architecture, understand, analyze, layers, call graph, brownfield]

Explore - Internal Codebase Exploration

Meta-skill for exploring an internal codebase at varying depths. READ-ONLY workflow - no code changes.

Usage

/explore <depth> [options]

Question Flow (No Arguments)

If the user types just `/explore` with no or partial arguments, guide them through this question flow. Use AskUserQuestion for each phase.

Phase 0: Workflow Selection

question: "How would you like to explore?"
header: "Explore"
options:
  - label: "Help me choose (Recommended)"
    description: "I'll ask questions to pick the right exploration depth"
  - label: "Quick - fast overview"
    description: "Chain: tldr tree → tldr structure (~1 min)"
  - label: "Deep - comprehensive analysis"
    description: "Chain: onboard → tldr → research → document (~5 min)"
  - label: "Architecture - layers & dependencies"
    description: "Chain: tldr arch → call graph → layer mapping (~3 min)"

**Mapping:**

  • "Help me choose" → Continue to Phase 1-4 questions
  • "Quick" → Set depth=quick, skip to Phase 2 (scope)
  • "Deep" → Set depth=deep, skip to Phase 2 (scope)
  • "Architecture" → Set depth=architecture, skip to Phase 2 (scope)

**If Answer is Unclear (via "Other"):**

question: "I want to understand how deep you want to explore. Did you mean..."
header: "Clarify"
options:
  - label: "Help me choose"
    description: "Not sure - guide me through questions"
  - label: "Quick - fast overview"
    description: "Just want to see what's here"
  - label: "Deep - comprehensive analysis"
    description: "Need thorough understanding"
  - label: "Neither - let me explain differently"
    description: "I'll describe what I need"

Phase 1: Exploration Goal

question: "What are you trying to understand?"
header: "Goal"
options:
  - label: "Get oriented in the codebase"
    description: "Quick overview of structure"
  - label: "Understand how something works"
    description: "Deep dive into specific area"
  - label: "Map the architecture"
    description: "Layers, dependencies, patterns"
  - label: "Find where something is"
    description: "Locate specific code/functionality"

**Mapping:**

  • "Get oriented" → quick depth
  • "Understand how" → deep depth
  • "Map architecture" → architecture depth
  • "Find where" → quick with --focus

Phase 2: Scope

question: "What area should I focus on?"
header: "Focus"
options:
  - label: "Entire codebase"
    description: "Explore everything"
  - label: "Specific directory or module"
    description: "I'll specify the path"
  - label: "Specific concept/feature"
    description: "e.g., 'authentication', 'API routes'"

If "Specific directory" or "Specific concept" → ask follow-up for the path/keyword.

Phase 3: Output Format

question: "What should I produce?"
header: "Output"
options:
  - label: "Just tell me what you find"
    description: "Interactive summary in chat"
  - label: "Create a documentation file"
    description: "Write to thoughts/shared/docs/"
  - label: "Create handoff for implementation"
    description: "Prepare context for coding agent"

**Mapping:**

  • "Documentation file" → --output doc
  • "Handoff for implementation" → --output handoff

Phase 4: Entry Point (Architecture only)

If architecture depth selected:

question: "Where should I start the analysis?"
header: "Entry point"
options:
  - label: "Auto-detect (main, cli, app)"
    description: "Find common entry points"
  - label: "Specific function/file"
    description: "I'll specify the entry point"

Summary Before Execution

Based on your answers, I'll run:

**Depth:** deep
**Focus:** "authentication"
**Output:** handoff
**Path:** src/

Proceed? [Yes / Adjust settings]

Depths

| Depth | Time | What it does | |-------|------|--------------| | `quick` | ~1 min | tldr-explorer only - fast structure overview | | `deep` | ~5 min | onboard + tldr-explorer + research-codebase + write doc | | `architecture` | ~3 min | tldr arch + call graph + layer mapping + circular dep detection |

Options

| Option | Description | Example | |--------|-------------|---------| | `--focus "area"` | Focus on specific area | `--focus "auth"`, `--focus "api"` | | `--output handoff` | Create handoff for next agent | `--output handoff` | | `--output doc` | Create documentation file | `--output doc` | | `--entry "func"` | Start from specific entry point | `--entry "main"`, `--entry "process_request"` |

Examples

# Quick structure overview
/explore quick

# Deep exploration focused on auth
/explore deep --focus "auth" --output doc

# Architecture analysis from specific entry
/explore architecture --entry "cli" --output handoff

# Quick focused exploration
/explore quick --focus "hooks"

Workflow Details

Quick Depth

Fast structure overview using tldr-explorer. Best for:

  • Initial orientation
  • Quick questions about structure
  • Finding where things are

**Steps:** 1. Run `tldr tree` for file structure 2. Run `tldr structure` for codemaps 3. If `--focus` provided, run `tldr search` for targeted results 4. Return summary

**Commands:**

# 1. File tree
tldr tree ${PATH:-src/} --ext .py

# 2. Code structure
tldr structure ${PATH:-src/} --lang python

# 3. Focused search (if --focus provided)
tldr search "${FOCUS}" ${PATH:-src/}

Deep Depth

Comprehensive exploration with documentation output. Best for:

  • First time in a codebase
  • Preparing for major work
  • Creating reference documentation

**Steps:** 1. Check if onboarded (look for `.claude/cache/tldr/`), if not run onboard 2. Run tldr-explorer for structure 3. Spawn research-codebase agent for patterns 4. Write findings to doc or handoff

**Subproce

Read more
@parcadei
Ships withcontinuous-claude-v3

A persistent, learning, multi-agent development environment built on Claude Code Continuous Claude transforms Claude Code into a continuously learning system that maintains context across sessions, orchestrates specialized agents, and eliminates wasting

3.9k156 skills32 agents
Get the whole plugin

Stars on GitHub

Momentum

stars in total
3.9k
Star history of parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 on GitHub, a chart by star-history.com

Other skills on continuous-claude-v3.

More skills from other plugins.

brainstorming
Auto-invoked

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…

@obra@obraInstall Skill
ask-matt

ask-matt

Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.

skills2w309k
@mattpocock@mattpocockInstall Skill
accessibility
Auto-invoked

accessibility

Design, implement, and audit accessible UI to WCAG 2.2 Level AA across Web, iOS, and Android — semantic ARIA roles and labels,…

ecc2w293k
@affaan-m@affaan-mInstall Skill
compiler-commit

compiler-commit

Use when you want to verify compiler changes and commit with the correct convention. Runs tests, lint, and format, then commits…

react5d252k
@facebook@facebookInstall Skill

Questions about explore.

Which coding agents can use explore?
explore installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.