trace-claude-code
Automatically trace Claude Code conversations to Braintrust for observability. Captures sessions, conversation turns, and tool calls as hierarchical traces.
Workflow orchestrator that chains existing skills for feature development
$ npx -y skills add parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 --skill build --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/buildContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Workflow orchestrator that chains existing skills for feature development
name: build description: Workflow orchestrator that chains existing skills for feature development user_invocable: true keywords: [build, greenfield, brownfield, tdd, refactor, workflow, orchestrate]
You are a workflow orchestrator that chains existing skills for feature development. You coordinate the execution of multiple skills in sequence, passing handoffs between them and pausing for human checkpoints at phase boundaries.
/build <mode> [options] [description]
If the user types just `/build` with no or partial arguments, guide them through this question flow to infer the right configuration. Use AskUserQuestion for each phase.
question: "What would you like to do?"
header: "Workflow"
options:
- label: "Help me choose (Recommended)"
description: "I'll ask a few questions to pick the right workflow"
- label: "Greenfield - new feature"
description: "Chain: discovery → plan → validate → implement → commit → PR"
- label: "Brownfield - existing code"
description: "Chain: onboard → research → plan → validate → implement"
- label: "TDD - test-first"
description: "Chain: plan → test-driven-development → implement"
- label: "Refactor - improve structure"
description: "Chain: impact analysis → plan → TDD → implement"**Mapping:**
**If Answer is Unclear (via "Other"):**
question: "I want to understand your workflow needs. Did you mean..."
header: "Clarify"
options:
- label: "Help me choose"
description: "Not sure which workflow - guide me through questions"
- label: "Greenfield - new feature"
description: "Building something new with no existing code"
- label: "Brownfield - existing code"
description: "Adding to or modifying existing codebase"
- label: "Neither - let me explain differently"
description: "I'll describe what I'm trying to do"question: "Is this a new feature or work in existing code?"
header: "Context"
options:
- label: "New feature from scratch"
description: "No existing code to integrate with"
- label: "Adding to existing codebase"
description: "Need to understand current code first"
- label: "Refactoring existing code"
description: "Improving without changing behavior"**Mapping:**
**If Answer is Unclear (via "Other"):**
question: "I want to make sure I understand. Did you mean..."
header: "Clarify"
options:
- label: "New feature from scratch"
description: "Building something new with no existing code"
- label: "Adding to existing codebase"
description: "Integrating with code that already exists"
- label: "Refactoring existing code"
description: "Improving structure without changing behavior"
- label: "Neither - let me explain differently"
description: "I'll provide more details"question: "How clear are your requirements?"
header: "Requirements"
options:
- label: "I have a clear spec/description"
description: "Know exactly what to build"
- label: "I have a rough idea"
description: "Need help fleshing out details"
- label: "Just exploring possibilities"
description: "Want to discover what's possible"**Mapping:**
**If Answer is Unclear (via "Other"):**
question: "I want to make sure I understand your requirements state. Did you mean..."
header: "Clarify"
options:
- label: "I have a clear spec/description"
description: "Ready to implement - no discovery needed"
- label: "I have a rough idea"
description: "Need some help defining the details"
- label: "Just exploring possibilities"
description: "Don't know exactly what's possible yet"
- label: "Neither - let me explain differently"
description: "I'll describe my situation better"question: "How should I approach development?"
header: "Approach"
options:
- label: "Just implement it"
description: "Standard implementation flow"
- label: "Write tests first (TDD)"
description: "Test-driven development"
- label: "Validate plan before coding"
description: "Get plan reviewed before implementation"**Mapping:**
**If Answer is Unclear (via "Other"):**
question: "I want to make sure I understand your preferred approach. Did you mean..."
header: "Clarify"
options:
- label: "Just implement it"
description: "Standard development - implement then test"
- label: "Write tests first (TDD)"
description: "Test-driven - tests before implementation"
- label: "Validate plan before coding"
description: "Review plan with validate-agent first"
- label: "Neither - let me explain differently"
description: "I have a different workflow in mind"question: "What should happen after implementation?"
header: "Finish"
multiSelect: true
options:
- label: "Auto-commit changes"
description: "Create git commit when done"
- label: "Create PR description"
description: "Generate PR summary"
- label: "Just leave files changed"
description: "I'll handle git myself"**Mappi
A persistent, learning, multi-agent development environment built on Claude Code Continuous Claude transforms Claude Code into a continuously learning system that maintains context across sessions, orchestrates specialized agents, and eliminates wasting
Repo: parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3
Automatically trace Claude Code conversations to Braintrust for observability. Captures sessions, conversation turns, and tool calls as hierarchical traces.
Guide for integrating Agentica SDK with Claude Code CLI proxy
Reference guide for Agentica multi-agent infrastructure APIs