brainstorm
Runs a structured design conversation — clarifies intent, proposes 2-3 approaches with trade-offs, iterates the design — and writes a user-approved engineering…
Improves unit test coverage on demand — discovers testing gaps via a reconnaissance agent and writes new tests that follow project conventions. Requires /optimus:init to have set up test infrastructure. Conservative — only adds new tests, never modifies existing test logic or
$ npx -y skills add oprogramadorreal/optimus-claude --skill unit-test --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/unit-testContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Improves unit test coverage on demand — discovers testing gaps via a reconnaissance agent and writes new tests that follow project conventions. Requires /optimus:init to have set up test infrastructure. Conservative — only adds new tests, never modifies existing test logic or
description: Improves unit test coverage on demand — discovers testing gaps via a reconnaissance agent and writes new tests that follow project conventions. Requires /optimus:init to have set up test infrastructure. Conservative — only adds new tests, never modifies existing test logic or source code; untestable code is flagged for /optimus:refactor. For an automated multi-cycle coverage loop, use /optimus:deep coverage. disable-model-invocation: true argument-hint: "[path]"
Improve unit test coverage for existing code. An optional path argument scopes the run.
If your invocation prompt body contains `HARNESS_MODE_INLINE`, you are a single cycle (unit-test phase) inside the `/optimus:deep coverage` orchestrator. Read `$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/references/coverage-harness-mode.md` and follow its "Unit-Test Phase Execution" section — that section governs which of the steps below run and how this run ends.
If `git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree` does not return `true`, read `$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/skills/init/references/multi-repo-detection.md` and apply it. When it returns `true`, resolve the repository root with `git rev-parse --show-toplevel`, including in a linked worktree or subdirectory. In a multi-repo workspace, run Steps 1–5 independently inside each repo that has `.claude/CLAUDE.md` and report results per repo; if no repo is initialized, suggest running `/optimus:init` first from the workspace root.
Check that `.claude/CLAUDE.md` exists. If it doesn't, stop and recommend running `/optimus:init` first — the project needs baseline context before test generation can be effective.
Load `.claude/CLAUDE.md`, `.claude/docs/coding-guidelines.md`, and `testing.md` where present; if `testing.md` is missing, derive testing conventions from existing test files. In a monorepo (read `$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/skills/init/references/project-detection.md` if the structure is unclear), process each subproject independently and load that subproject's own `docs/testing.md` / `docs/` files — never another subproject's; shared guidelines come from root `.claude/docs/`.
`$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/skills/unit-test/agents/test-infrastructure-analyzer.md` defines what this step has to produce. On a small or path-scoped project — roughly under 100 source files — **run it yourself**: surveying test files, framework, runner command and coverage tooling, then running the suite and coverage, is a handful of tool calls, and doing it inline keeps the file list you are about to write tests against in context.
Delegate when surveying the tree inline would flood this context: for each subproject (or the single project), launch one `general-purpose` agent with that prompt, prepended with the "Agent Constraints" section of `$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/references/shared-agent-constraints.md`. Assemble the prompt per "Prompt assembly at dispatch time" in `$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/references/agent-architecture.md`.
Under `HARNESS_MODE_INLINE` on cycles 2+, the cycle context block from the "Run discovery and coverage analysis" section of coverage-harness-mode.md applies on **both** paths: prepend it to the agent's prompt when delegating, and read it as your own context when running this step inline. It carries the previous cycle's coverage numbers and convergence state — without it the inline path re-derives what the loop already established, and the plateau check never sees the repeat.
Present the Discovery Results and Coverage Analysis to the user.
**Harness mode:** when a stop gate fires, do not print the conversational messages below — follow the "Stop gates under harness mode" rule in coverage-harness-mode.md: emit the Step 6 JSON immediately with a non-null `blocked` field and stop.
**If no test framework is detected**, stop and report: "No test framework found. Run `/optimus:init` (or re-run it) to install a test framework and set up test infrastructure before using this skill. For a project with no code or detectable stack yet, pick **Scaffold new project** when init asks." Never generate tests without a working framework.
**If the test suite reports failures**, stop — this skill never fixes failing tests or build-level issues.
> Pre-existing tests are failing. A green baseline is required before adding new tests, and this skill does not modify existing tests or source code. Stay in this conversation and ask Claude to triage the failing tests listed in Bugs Discovered; once the baseline is green, re-run `/optimus:unit-test` in a fresh conversation.
> The test runner cannot start or test files fail to compile. These are build-level issues, not test logic, and `/optimus:init` owns that repair path. Run `/optimus:init` in a fresh conversation — its health check proposes minimal fixes and re-runs the suite. Once the build is healthy, re-run `/optimus:unit-test` in another fresh conversation.
Create a prioritized list, **capped at 10 items per run**: exported/public functions and classes → pure functions and utility modules → business logic with clear inputs/outputs → complex branching logic → internal/private helpers (test through the public API when possible).
**Skip** (flag in the summary, don't attempt): code untestable without refactoring, generated code, migration files, declarative configuration,
Repo: oprogramadorreal/optimus-claude
Runs a structured design conversation — clarifies intent, proposes 2-3 approaches with trade-offs, iterates the design — and writes a user-approved engineering…
Reviews local changes, an open PR/MR, or a branch diff against the project's own coding guidelines through the review lenses — bugs, security, guidelines,…
Stages, commits, and optionally pushes local changes with a Conventional Commits message — always previews and confirms first, and offers a feature branch on…
Runs an iterative auto-fix loop on a chosen target — review, refactor, or coverage — dispatching the base skill into fresh subagent contexts per iteration,…
Prunes and consolidates the project's auto-memory to keep it minimal — deletes stale, wrong, or redundant memories, merges overlapping ones into existing…
Runs a Gauntlet Loop: turns an ambitious goal and optional quality references into a minimal builder/critic prompt judged against a concrete comparison bar,…