agent-transcript
Requested GitHub PR/issue agent transcripts: redact, trim, preview, and insert safely.
Clipboard-ready handoff prompt for another agent to investigate or continue a task.
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add openclaw/agent-skills --skill handoff --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add openclaw/agent-skills --skill handoff -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add openclaw/agent-skills --skill handoff -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add openclaw/agent-skills --skill handoff -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add openclaw/agent-skills --skill handoff -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add openclaw/agent-skills --skill handoff -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add openclaw/agent-skills --skill handoff -a windsurf -y
name: handoff description: "Clipboard-ready handoff prompt for another agent to investigate or continue a task."
Write a clipboard-ready prompt for another agent to investigate, discuss, or work on a specific task.
Use when the user asks for `handoff <task>`, "write a handoff", "delegate this", or wants a prompt for another agent.
1. Identify the task from the user text. If the user gives only a short label, infer from the current repo, recent discussion, branch name, linked issue/PR, docs, and obvious nearby context. 2. Gather enough context to write a useful handoff: repo/product identity, relevant issue/PR/branch names, likely modules, constraints, and known symptoms. Do not perform the receiving agent's full independent review or decide the final technical direction for them. 3. Write a standalone prompt preserving the requested mode, existing authority, accepted decisions, completed proof, remaining work, and completion condition. 4. Copy the full prompt to the clipboard. 5. Final reply: terse confirmation with the task title. Do not paste the full prompt unless the user asks.
The prompt must:
Size independent review to the remaining uncertainty and repository requirements.
them. An execution handoff must not reset the task to a proposal.
or a home directory and can find the repo itself.
names, or repo-relative file paths unless the user explicitly requests them.
URLs, branch names, package/plugin names, public symbols, command names, config keys, exact error text, docs titles, and search terms.
and desired outcome.
output shape.
public comments unless the handoff explicitly asks for it.
Adapt this shape to the requested mode:
<Investigate, discuss, or continue execution of>: <short task title> Context: - <portable repo/product context> - <what triggered this task> - <known current state, branch/issue/PR names or URLs if relevant> - <important constraints and ownership boundaries> - <existing authority, accepted decisions, completed work, and remaining gaps> Resume: - Find the right repository from the current directory, a parent directory, or the usual workspace. - Read the local agent/repo instructions. - Inspect the relevant code, docs, tests, recent commits, and linked issue/PR state. - Verify unresolved assumptions without repeating completed work or reopening settled decisions absent new evidence. - Call out stale assumptions, hidden risks, and anything that should stop the work. Task: - <next investigation or already-authorized implementation> - <expected behavior or decision criteria> - <non-goals> - <completion condition and concrete stop conditions> Validation: - <focused tests/checks/live proof expected> - <what evidence should be included> - <what is explicitly not required> Output: - For investigation, report findings and recommendation. - For execution, complete the authorized work and report the result or precise blocker. - If you edit code, keep changes scoped and report exact proof run. - Do not push, merge, close issues/PRs, label, or post public comments unless explicitly told.
On macOS:
pbcopy < /tmp/handoff-prompt.txt
Use a temp file or pipe. Avoid inline shell quoting for prompts containing backticks, `$`, quotes, or user text.
If `pbcopy` is unavailable, use the obvious platform clipboard tool (`wl-copy`, `xclip`, `clip.exe`) or print the prompt and say clipboard copy was unavailable.
issue/PR URL, or search term.
or losing existing authorization.
Shared skills for coding agents that work on OpenClaw projects. This repo is the public canonical source for common workflows such as review closeout and remote validation.
Requested GitHub PR/issue agent transcripts: redact, trim, preview, and insert safely.
Structured code review when explicitly requested, preferring OpenAI/Codex before Claude.
Share a redacted coding session or hand its logical conversation to an authenticated OpenClaw Gateway.
Source-blind user behavior validation against a prewritten contract for apps, CLIs, APIs, and generated artifacts.
Crabbox/Testbox remote proof: portable provider routing, untrusted isolation, Linux/macOS/Windows/WSL2, live E2E, diagnostics,…
House README standard: structure, badge row, tone, per-archetype templates, and verification gates for steipete/openclaw repos.
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.