/review
Run a Codex code review against local git state
> /plugin marketplace add openai/codex-plugin-cc > /plugin install codex@openai-codex
How it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfClaude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/review
Context preview
What this command does when you run it.
Run a Codex code review against local git state
Command definition
review.mddescription: Run a Codex code review against local git state
argument-hint: '[--wait|--background] [--base <ref>] [--scope auto|working-tree|branch]'
disable-model-invocation: true
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Bash(node:*), Bash(git:*), AskUserQuestion
Run a Codex review through the shared built-in reviewer.
Raw slash-command arguments: `$ARGUMENTS`
Core constraint:
- This command is review-only.
- Do not fix issues, apply patches, or suggest that you are about to make changes.
- Your only job is to run the review and return Codex's output verbatim to the user.
Execution mode rules:
- If the raw arguments include `--wait`, do not ask. Run the review in the foreground.
- If the raw arguments include `--background`, do not ask. Run the review in a Claude background task.
- Otherwise, estimate the review size before asking:
- For working-tree review, start with `git status --short --untracked-files=all`.
- For working-tree review, also inspect both `git diff --shortstat --cached` and `git diff --shortstat`.
- For base-branch review, use `git diff --shortstat <base>...HEAD`.
- Treat untracked files or directories as reviewable work even when `git diff --shortstat` is empty.
- Only conclude there is nothing to review when the relevant working-tree status is empty or the explicit branch diff is empty.
- Recommend waiting only when the review is clearly tiny, roughly 1-2 files total and no sign of a broader directory-sized change.
- In every other case, including unclear size, recommend background.
- When in doubt, run the review instead of declaring that there is nothing to review.
- Then use `AskUserQuestion` exactly once with two options, putting the recommended option first and suffixing its label with `(Recommended)`:
- `Wait for results`
- `Run in background`
Argument handling:
- Preserve the user's arguments exactly.
- Do not strip `--wait` or `--background` yourself.
- Do not add extra review instructions or rewrite the user's intent.
- The companion script parses `--wait` and `--background`, but Claude Code's `Bash(..., run_in_background: true)` is what actually detaches the run.
- `/codex:review` is native-review only. It does not support staged-only review, unstaged-only review, or extra focus text.
- If the user needs custom review instructions or more adversarial framing, they should use `/codex:adversarial-review`.
Foreground flow:
- Run:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/codex-companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"- Return the command stdout verbatim, exactly as-is.
- Do not paraphrase, summarize, or add commentary before or after it.
- Do not fix any issues mentioned in the review output.
Background flow:
- Launch the review with `Bash` in the background:
Bash({
command: `node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/codex-companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"`,
description: "Codex review",
run_in_background: true
})- Do not call `BashOutput` or wait for completion in this turn.
- After launching the command, tell the user: "Codex review started in the background. Check `/codex:status` for progress."
Read more
description: Run a Codex code review against local git state argument-hint: '[--wait|--background] [--base <ref>] [--scope auto|working-tree|branch]' disable-model-invocation: true allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Bash(node:*), Bash(git:*), AskUserQuestion
Run a Codex review through the shared built-in reviewer.
Raw slash-command arguments: `$ARGUMENTS`
Core constraint:
- This command is review-only.
- Do not fix issues, apply patches, or suggest that you are about to make changes.
- Your only job is to run the review and return Codex's output verbatim to the user.
Execution mode rules:
- If the raw arguments include `--wait`, do not ask. Run the review in the foreground.
- If the raw arguments include `--background`, do not ask. Run the review in a Claude background task.
- Otherwise, estimate the review size before asking:
- For working-tree review, start with `git status --short --untracked-files=all`.
- For working-tree review, also inspect both `git diff --shortstat --cached` and `git diff --shortstat`.
- For base-branch review, use `git diff --shortstat <base>...HEAD`.
- Treat untracked files or directories as reviewable work even when `git diff --shortstat` is empty.
- Only conclude there is nothing to review when the relevant working-tree status is empty or the explicit branch diff is empty.
- Recommend waiting only when the review is clearly tiny, roughly 1-2 files total and no sign of a broader directory-sized change.
- In every other case, including unclear size, recommend background.
- When in doubt, run the review instead of declaring that there is nothing to review.
- Then use `AskUserQuestion` exactly once with two options, putting the recommended option first and suffixing its label with `(Recommended)`:
- `Wait for results`
- `Run in background`
Argument handling:
- Preserve the user's arguments exactly.
- Do not strip `--wait` or `--background` yourself.
- Do not add extra review instructions or rewrite the user's intent.
- The companion script parses `--wait` and `--background`, but Claude Code's `Bash(..., run_in_background: true)` is what actually detaches the run.
- `/codex:review` is native-review only. It does not support staged-only review, unstaged-only review, or extra focus text.
- If the user needs custom review instructions or more adversarial framing, they should use `/codex:adversarial-review`.
Foreground flow:
- Run:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/codex-companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"- Return the command stdout verbatim, exactly as-is.
- Do not paraphrase, summarize, or add commentary before or after it.
- Do not fix any issues mentioned in the review output.
Background flow:
- Launch the review with `Bash` in the background:
Bash({
command: `node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/codex-companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"`,
description: "Codex review",
run_in_background: true
})- Do not call `BashOutput` or wait for completion in this turn.
- After launching the command, tell the user: "Codex review started in the background. Check `/codex:status` for progress."
Use Codex from inside Claude Code for code reviews or to delegate tasks to Codex. This plugin is for Claude Code users who want an easy way to start using Codex from the workflow they already have.
Repo: openai/codex-plugin-cc
Other commands on codex-plugin-cc.
- /adversarial-review
Run a Codex review that challenges the implementation approach and design choices
Open command - /cancel
Cancel an active background Codex job in this repository
Open command - /rescue
Delegate investigation, an explicit fix request, or follow-up rescue work to the Codex rescue subagent
Open command - /result
Show the stored final output for a finished Codex job in this repository
Open command - /setup
Check whether the local Codex CLI is ready and optionally toggle the stop-time review gate
Open command - /status
Show active and recent Codex jobs for this repository, including review-gate status
Open command

