nw-ab-critique-dimensi…
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
Selects a quality-vs-token-consumption profile (lean, standard, thorough, exhaustive, custom, inherit) and persists it globally (~/.nwave/global-config.json) or per-project (.nwave/des-config.json). Use when tuning how much rigor wave commands apply.
$ npx -y skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-rigor --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/nw-rigorContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Selects a quality-vs-token-consumption profile (lean, standard, thorough, exhaustive, custom, inherit) and persists it globally (~/.nwave/global-config.json) or per-project (.nwave/des-config.json). Use when tuning how much rigor wave commands apply.
name: nw-rigor description: "Selects a quality-vs-token-consumption profile (lean, standard, thorough, exhaustive, custom, inherit) and persists it globally (~/.nwave/global-config.json) or per-project (.nwave/des-config.json). Use when tuning how much rigor wave commands apply." user-invocable: false argument-hint: '[profile] - Optional: lean, standard, thorough, exhaustive, custom, inherit. Omit for interactive selection.'
**Wave**: CROSS_WAVE | **Agent**: Main Instance (self) | **Command**: `/nw-rigor [profile]`
Interactive command to select a quality-vs-token-consumption profile. Persists choice to either `~/.nwave/global-config.json` (global scope) or `.nwave/des-config.json` (project scope) under the `rigor` key. All wave commands read this config to adjust agent models, review policy, TDD phases, and mutation testing.
You (the main Claude instance) run this directly. No subagent delegation.
**Note on TDD phase canons (dual-canon, ADR-025, 2026-05-07)**: the canonical TDD cycle is **3-phase v5** (`RED, GREEN, COMMIT`) as described in `nw-tdd-methodology`. The **legacy 5-phase v4** (`PREPARE, RED_ACCEPTANCE, RED_UNIT, GREEN, COMMIT`) is preserved for backward-compat audit-log replay of pre-2026-05-07 commits. The `.nwave/des-config.json` `tdd_phases` field accepts BOTH canons: writers of new logs may emit v5; the validator + schema (`step-tdd-cycle-schema.json`) dispatch on `schema_version` (`"5.0"` → canonical, anything else → legacy). The profile table below shows both canons side-by-side: pick v5 for new features, keep v4 only when extending a feature whose audit log was started under the legacy canon.
| Setting | lean | standard [recommended] | thorough | exhaustive | inherit | |--------------------|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | agent_model | haiku | sonnet | opus | opus | inherit | | reviewer_model | skip | haiku | sonnet | opus | haiku | | review_enabled | false | true | true | true | true | | double_review | false | false | true | true | false | | tdd_phases (v5 canonical, ADR-025) | [RED, GREEN] | [RED, GREEN, COMMIT] | [RED, GREEN, COMMIT] | [RED, GREEN, COMMIT] | [RED, GREEN, COMMIT] | | tdd_phases (v4 legacy, audit-replay) | [RED_UNIT, GREEN] | [PREPARE, RED_ACCEPTANCE, RED_UNIT, GREEN, COMMIT] | [PREPARE, RED_ACCEPTANCE, RED_UNIT, GREEN, COMMIT] | [PREPARE, RED_ACCEPTANCE, RED_UNIT, GREEN, COMMIT] | [PREPARE, RED_ACCEPTANCE, RED_UNIT, GREEN, COMMIT] | | refactor_pass | false | true | true | true | true | | mutation_enabled | false | false | false | true | false |
Read `.nwave/des-config.json`. If missing or `.nwave/` directory absent -> error: "No nWave config directory foun
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with human judgment at every gate. nWave runs inside Claude Code. It breaks feature delivery into seven waves (discover, diverge, discuss, design, devops, distill, deliver).
Repo: nWave-ai/nWave
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton…
Detailed 5-phase workflow for creating agents - from requirements analysis through validation and iterative refinement
5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance
Architectural style selection decision matrices, trade-off analysis, structural enforcement rules, and combination patterns. Load when choosing or evaluating…