/nw-query-optimization
SQL and NoSQL query optimization techniques, indexing strategies, execution plan analysis, JOIN algorithms, cardinality estimation, and database-specific query patterns
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-query-optimization --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-query-optimization -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-query-optimization -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-query-optimization -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-query-optimization -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-query-optimization -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-query-optimization -a windsurf -y
SKILL.md
nw-query-optimization.SKILL.mdname: nw-query-optimization
description: SQL and NoSQL query optimization techniques, indexing strategies, execution plan analysis, JOIN algorithms, cardinality estimation, and database-specific query patterns
user-invocable: false
disable-model-invocation: true
Query Optimization
Cost-Based Optimization
Modern relational DBs use cost-based optimizers (CBO): generate plan candidates -> estimate cost via statistics (row counts, distributions, selectivity) -> select lowest I/O/CPU/memory plan. Stale statistics lead to suboptimal plans.
Execution Plan Analysis
Validate optimization with EXPLAIN before and after changes.
-- PostgreSQL (add ANALYZE for actual runtime stats)
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT order_id, total FROM orders WHERE customer_id = 12345;
-- MySQL: EXPLAIN FORMAT=JSON ... | SQL Server: SET STATISTICS IO ON
Key indicators: **Seq Scan/Table Scan** = missing index | **Index Scan/Seek** = efficient | **Hash Join** = large equality joins | **Nested Loop** = small/indexed inner | **Merge Join** = pre-sorted inputs | **Sort** = watch disk spills
Indexing Strategies
B-Tree (Default)
Supports: equality, range, sorting, prefix matching | O(log n) lookup | General-purpose, all major DBs default
Hash
Equality only | O(1) lookup | High-cardinality exact-match | No range/sorting/pattern support
Covering Indexes
Include all query columns in index -> eliminates table access (index-only scan) | Trade-off: larger index, slower writes
-- Covering index for: SELECT name, email FROM users WHERE status = 'active'
CREATE INDEX idx_users_status_covering ON users(status) INCLUDE (name, email);
PostgreSQL Specialized
- **GiST**: Geometric data, full-text search, nearest-neighbor
- **GIN**: Arrays, full-text search, JSONB queries
- **BRIN**: Large tables with physically correlated data (timestamps), minimal storage
- **SP-GiST**: Non-balanced structures, point-based geometric queries
Compound Index Design
Order by: 1. Equality conditions first (highest selectivity) | 2. Sort columns second | 3. Range conditions last
MongoDB ESR Rule
Equality-Sort-Range ordering for compound indexes:
// Query: status = "A", qty > 20, sorted by item
// Optimal index:
db.collection.createIndex({ status: 1, item: 1, qty: 1 })
// E(quality) S(ort) R(ange)SQL Optimization Patterns
Select Only Needed Columns
-- Bad: SELECT * retrieves unnecessary data, prevents covering indexes
SELECT * FROM orders WHERE customer_id = 12345;
-- Good: Specify columns, enables covering index
SELECT order_id, order_date, total FROM orders WHERE customer_id = 12345;
Other Key Patterns
- **CTEs**: Improve readability but not always performance -- PostgreSQL may materialize CTEs (pre-v12), MySQL inlines them
- **Window functions**: Use `SUM() OVER`, `RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY ...)` for analytics without self-joins
- **Pagination**: Prefer keyset (`WHERE id > last_seen ORDER BY id LIMIT N`) over OFFSET for deep pages
- **Parameterized queries**: Prevent SQL injection AND enable plan caching (`cursor.execute("... WHERE id = %s", (id,))`)
JOIN Algorithm Selection
| Algorithm | Best When | Cost | |-----------|-----------|------| | Nested Loop | Small outer table, indexed inner table | O(n * m) worst, O(n * log m) with index | | Hash Join | Large tables, equality joins, no useful indexes | O(n + m) build + probe | | Merge Join | Both inputs already sorted (index order) | O(n + m) after sort |
Cardinality Estimation
Optimizer predicts row counts using: **Histograms** (value distribution) | **Density vectors** (non-histogram columns) | **Statistics objects** via ANALYZE (PostgreSQL) / UPDATE STATISTICS (SQL Server)
When estimation is wrong (correlated columns, skewed data, multi-table joins): 1. Run ANALYZE/UPDATE STATISTICS | 2. Create multi-column statistics | 3. Query hints as last resort
NoSQL Query Optimization
MongoDB
Place `$match`/`$project` early in pipelines | Use `$lookup` sparingly (left outer joins) | Compound indexes following ESR | Validate with `explain("executionStats")`
Cassandra
Always include partition key | Design tables around query patterns (query-first) | Use SAI over SASI (43% throughput gain) | Avoid ALLOW FILTERING (full cluster scan) | Materialized views add write overhead
DynamoDB
Use Query not Scan | Design partition keys for even distribution | GSIs for alternative access patterns | Single-table design with composite sort keys
Redis
FT.SEARCH for complex queries (RediSearch module) | Design key naming for efficient SCAN | Use pipelining for batch ops
Anti-Patterns to Detect
- **SELECT ***: Wastes I/O, prevents covering indexes
- **Missing indexes** on WHERE/JOIN/ORDER BY columns: full table scans
- **N+1 queries**: Fetch in loops instead of JOINs/batch
- **Implicit type conversions**: Prevents index use (WHERE varchar_col = 123)
- **Functions on indexed columns**: `WHERE UPPER(name) = 'JOHN'` blocks index; use function-based indexes
- **Missing pagination**: Unbounded result sets
- **Hot partitions** (NoSQL): Low-cardinality partition keys concentrate load
- **ALLOW FILTERING** (Cassandra): Expensive full-cluster scans
- **Large partitions** (Cassandra): >100MB degrades performance
Read more
name: nw-query-optimization description: SQL and NoSQL query optimization techniques, indexing strategies, execution plan analysis, JOIN algorithms, cardinality estimation, and database-specific query patterns user-invocable: false disable-model-invocation: true
Query Optimization
Cost-Based Optimization
Modern relational DBs use cost-based optimizers (CBO): generate plan candidates -> estimate cost via statistics (row counts, distributions, selectivity) -> select lowest I/O/CPU/memory plan. Stale statistics lead to suboptimal plans.
Execution Plan Analysis
Validate optimization with EXPLAIN before and after changes.
-- PostgreSQL (add ANALYZE for actual runtime stats) EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT order_id, total FROM orders WHERE customer_id = 12345; -- MySQL: EXPLAIN FORMAT=JSON ... | SQL Server: SET STATISTICS IO ON
Key indicators: **Seq Scan/Table Scan** = missing index | **Index Scan/Seek** = efficient | **Hash Join** = large equality joins | **Nested Loop** = small/indexed inner | **Merge Join** = pre-sorted inputs | **Sort** = watch disk spills
Indexing Strategies
B-Tree (Default)
Supports: equality, range, sorting, prefix matching | O(log n) lookup | General-purpose, all major DBs default
Hash
Equality only | O(1) lookup | High-cardinality exact-match | No range/sorting/pattern support
Covering Indexes
Include all query columns in index -> eliminates table access (index-only scan) | Trade-off: larger index, slower writes
-- Covering index for: SELECT name, email FROM users WHERE status = 'active' CREATE INDEX idx_users_status_covering ON users(status) INCLUDE (name, email);
PostgreSQL Specialized
- **GiST**: Geometric data, full-text search, nearest-neighbor
- **GIN**: Arrays, full-text search, JSONB queries
- **BRIN**: Large tables with physically correlated data (timestamps), minimal storage
- **SP-GiST**: Non-balanced structures, point-based geometric queries
Compound Index Design
Order by: 1. Equality conditions first (highest selectivity) | 2. Sort columns second | 3. Range conditions last
MongoDB ESR Rule
Equality-Sort-Range ordering for compound indexes:
// Query: status = "A", qty > 20, sorted by item
// Optimal index:
db.collection.createIndex({ status: 1, item: 1, qty: 1 })
// E(quality) S(ort) R(ange)SQL Optimization Patterns
Select Only Needed Columns
-- Bad: SELECT * retrieves unnecessary data, prevents covering indexes SELECT * FROM orders WHERE customer_id = 12345; -- Good: Specify columns, enables covering index SELECT order_id, order_date, total FROM orders WHERE customer_id = 12345;
Other Key Patterns
- **CTEs**: Improve readability but not always performance -- PostgreSQL may materialize CTEs (pre-v12), MySQL inlines them
- **Window functions**: Use `SUM() OVER`, `RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY ...)` for analytics without self-joins
- **Pagination**: Prefer keyset (`WHERE id > last_seen ORDER BY id LIMIT N`) over OFFSET for deep pages
- **Parameterized queries**: Prevent SQL injection AND enable plan caching (`cursor.execute("... WHERE id = %s", (id,))`)
JOIN Algorithm Selection
| Algorithm | Best When | Cost | |-----------|-----------|------| | Nested Loop | Small outer table, indexed inner table | O(n * m) worst, O(n * log m) with index | | Hash Join | Large tables, equality joins, no useful indexes | O(n + m) build + probe | | Merge Join | Both inputs already sorted (index order) | O(n + m) after sort |
Cardinality Estimation
Optimizer predicts row counts using: **Histograms** (value distribution) | **Density vectors** (non-histogram columns) | **Statistics objects** via ANALYZE (PostgreSQL) / UPDATE STATISTICS (SQL Server)
When estimation is wrong (correlated columns, skewed data, multi-table joins): 1. Run ANALYZE/UPDATE STATISTICS | 2. Create multi-column statistics | 3. Query hints as last resort
NoSQL Query Optimization
MongoDB
Place `$match`/`$project` early in pipelines | Use `$lookup` sparingly (left outer joins) | Compound indexes following ESR | Validate with `explain("executionStats")`
Cassandra
Always include partition key | Design tables around query patterns (query-first) | Use SAI over SASI (43% throughput gain) | Avoid ALLOW FILTERING (full cluster scan) | Materialized views add write overhead
DynamoDB
Use Query not Scan | Design partition keys for even distribution | GSIs for alternative access patterns | Single-table design with composite sort keys
Redis
FT.SEARCH for complex queries (RediSearch module) | Design key naming for efficient SCAN | Use pipelining for batch ops
Anti-Patterns to Detect
- **SELECT ***: Wastes I/O, prevents covering indexes
- **Missing indexes** on WHERE/JOIN/ORDER BY columns: full table scans
- **N+1 queries**: Fetch in loops instead of JOINs/batch
- **Implicit type conversions**: Prevents index use (WHERE varchar_col = 123)
- **Functions on indexed columns**: `WHERE UPPER(name) = 'JOHN'` blocks index; use function-based indexes
- **Missing pagination**: Unbounded result sets
- **Hot partitions** (NoSQL): Low-cardinality partition keys concentrate load
- **ALLOW FILTERING** (Cassandra): Expensive full-cluster scans
- **Large partitions** (Cassandra): >100MB degrades performance
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with human judgment at every gate. nWave runs inside Claude Code. It breaks feature delivery into seven waves (discover, diverge, discuss, design, devops, distill, deliver).
Other skills on nwave.
More skills from other plugins.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
ask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Questions about nw-query-optimization.
- Which coding agents can use nw-query-optimization?
- nw-query-optimization installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.

