nw-ab-critique-dimensi…
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
SQL and NoSQL query optimization techniques, indexing strategies, execution plan analysis, JOIN algorithms, cardinality estimation, and database-specific query patterns
$ npx -y skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-query-optimization --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/nw-query-optimizationContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
SQL and NoSQL query optimization techniques, indexing strategies, execution plan analysis, JOIN algorithms, cardinality estimation, and database-specific query patterns
name: nw-query-optimization description: SQL and NoSQL query optimization techniques, indexing strategies, execution plan analysis, JOIN algorithms, cardinality estimation, and database-specific query patterns user-invocable: false disable-model-invocation: true
Modern relational DBs use cost-based optimizers (CBO): generate plan candidates -> estimate cost via statistics (row counts, distributions, selectivity) -> select lowest I/O/CPU/memory plan. Stale statistics lead to suboptimal plans.
Validate optimization with EXPLAIN before and after changes.
-- PostgreSQL (add ANALYZE for actual runtime stats) EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT order_id, total FROM orders WHERE customer_id = 12345; -- MySQL: EXPLAIN FORMAT=JSON ... | SQL Server: SET STATISTICS IO ON
Key indicators: **Seq Scan/Table Scan** = missing index | **Index Scan/Seek** = efficient | **Hash Join** = large equality joins | **Nested Loop** = small/indexed inner | **Merge Join** = pre-sorted inputs | **Sort** = watch disk spills
Supports: equality, range, sorting, prefix matching | O(log n) lookup | General-purpose, all major DBs default
Equality only | O(1) lookup | High-cardinality exact-match | No range/sorting/pattern support
Include all query columns in index -> eliminates table access (index-only scan) | Trade-off: larger index, slower writes
-- Covering index for: SELECT name, email FROM users WHERE status = 'active' CREATE INDEX idx_users_status_covering ON users(status) INCLUDE (name, email);
Order by: 1. Equality conditions first (highest selectivity) | 2. Sort columns second | 3. Range conditions last
Equality-Sort-Range ordering for compound indexes:
// Query: status = "A", qty > 20, sorted by item
// Optimal index:
db.collection.createIndex({ status: 1, item: 1, qty: 1 })
// E(quality) S(ort) R(ange)-- Bad: SELECT * retrieves unnecessary data, prevents covering indexes SELECT * FROM orders WHERE customer_id = 12345; -- Good: Specify columns, enables covering index SELECT order_id, order_date, total FROM orders WHERE customer_id = 12345;
| Algorithm | Best When | Cost | |-----------|-----------|------| | Nested Loop | Small outer table, indexed inner table | O(n * m) worst, O(n * log m) with index | | Hash Join | Large tables, equality joins, no useful indexes | O(n + m) build + probe | | Merge Join | Both inputs already sorted (index order) | O(n + m) after sort |
Optimizer predicts row counts using: **Histograms** (value distribution) | **Density vectors** (non-histogram columns) | **Statistics objects** via ANALYZE (PostgreSQL) / UPDATE STATISTICS (SQL Server)
When estimation is wrong (correlated columns, skewed data, multi-table joins): 1. Run ANALYZE/UPDATE STATISTICS | 2. Create multi-column statistics | 3. Query hints as last resort
Place `$match`/`$project` early in pipelines | Use `$lookup` sparingly (left outer joins) | Compound indexes following ESR | Validate with `explain("executionStats")`
Always include partition key | Design tables around query patterns (query-first) | Use SAI over SASI (43% throughput gain) | Avoid ALLOW FILTERING (full cluster scan) | Materialized views add write overhead
Use Query not Scan | Design partition keys for even distribution | GSIs for alternative access patterns | Single-table design with composite sort keys
FT.SEARCH for complex queries (RediSearch module) | Design key naming for efficient SCAN | Use pipelining for batch ops
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with human judgment at every gate. nWave runs inside Claude Code. It breaks feature delivery into seven waves (discover, diverge, discuss, design, devops, distill, deliver).
Repo: nWave-ai/nWave
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton…
Detailed 5-phase workflow for creating agents - from requirements analysis through validation and iterative refinement
5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance
Architectural style selection decision matrices, trade-off analysis, structural enforcement rules, and combination patterns. Load when choosing or evaluating…