/nw-quality-validation
Type-specific validation checklists, six quality characteristics, and quality gate thresholds for documentation assessment
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-quality-validation --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-quality-validation -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-quality-validation -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-quality-validation -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-quality-validation -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-quality-validation -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-quality-validation -a windsurf -y
SKILL.md
nw-quality-validation.SKILL.mdname: nw-quality-validation
description: Type-specific validation checklists, six quality characteristics, and quality gate thresholds for documentation assessment
user-invocable: false
disable-model-invocation: true
Quality Validation
Six Quality Characteristics
- **Accuracy**: Factually correct, technically sound, current | Validation: expert review, automated testing
- **Completeness**: All necessary info present for doc type | Validation: checklist, gap analysis
- **Clarity**: Easy to understand, logical flow, appropriate level | Validation: Flesch 70-80
- **Consistency**: Uniform terminology, formatting, structure | Validation: style guide compliance
- **Correctness**: Proper grammar, spelling, punctuation | Validation: automated check, zero errors
- **Usability**: User achieves goal efficiently | Validation: task success, DIVIO type purpose served
Quality Gate Thresholds
| Metric | Threshold | |--------|-----------| | Readability (Flesch) | 70-80 | | Spelling errors | 0 | | Broken links | 0 | | Style compliance | 95%+ | | Type purity | 80%+ single type |
Type-Specific Validation Checklists
Tutorial Checklist
- [ ] Completable without external references | [ ] Steps numbered and sequential
- [ ] Each step has verifiable outcome | [ ] No assumed prior knowledge | [ ] Builds confidence
How-to Checklist
- [ ] Clear goal stated upfront | [ ] Assumes fundamentals known
- [ ] Single task focus | [ ] Ends with completion indicator | [ ] No basics teaching
Reference Checklist
- [ ] All parameters documented | [ ] Return values specified
- [ ] Error conditions listed | [ ] Examples per entry | [ ] No narrative
Explanation Checklist
- [ ] Addresses "why" not "what" | [ ] Provides context and reasoning
- [ ] Discusses alternatives | [ ] No task steps | [ ] Builds conceptual model
Verdict Criteria
- **approved**: Passes all type-specific validation, no collapse violations, meets quality gates
- **needs-revision**: Minor issues fixable in place (clarity, missing examples, small gaps)
- **restructure-required**: Collapse detected requiring split, or fundamental type mismatch
Read more
name: nw-quality-validation description: Type-specific validation checklists, six quality characteristics, and quality gate thresholds for documentation assessment user-invocable: false disable-model-invocation: true
Quality Validation
Six Quality Characteristics
- **Accuracy**: Factually correct, technically sound, current | Validation: expert review, automated testing
- **Completeness**: All necessary info present for doc type | Validation: checklist, gap analysis
- **Clarity**: Easy to understand, logical flow, appropriate level | Validation: Flesch 70-80
- **Consistency**: Uniform terminology, formatting, structure | Validation: style guide compliance
- **Correctness**: Proper grammar, spelling, punctuation | Validation: automated check, zero errors
- **Usability**: User achieves goal efficiently | Validation: task success, DIVIO type purpose served
Quality Gate Thresholds
| Metric | Threshold | |--------|-----------| | Readability (Flesch) | 70-80 | | Spelling errors | 0 | | Broken links | 0 | | Style compliance | 95%+ | | Type purity | 80%+ single type |
Type-Specific Validation Checklists
Tutorial Checklist
- [ ] Completable without external references | [ ] Steps numbered and sequential
- [ ] Each step has verifiable outcome | [ ] No assumed prior knowledge | [ ] Builds confidence
How-to Checklist
- [ ] Clear goal stated upfront | [ ] Assumes fundamentals known
- [ ] Single task focus | [ ] Ends with completion indicator | [ ] No basics teaching
Reference Checklist
- [ ] All parameters documented | [ ] Return values specified
- [ ] Error conditions listed | [ ] Examples per entry | [ ] No narrative
Explanation Checklist
- [ ] Addresses "why" not "what" | [ ] Provides context and reasoning
- [ ] Discusses alternatives | [ ] No task steps | [ ] Builds conceptual model
Verdict Criteria
- **approved**: Passes all type-specific validation, no collapse violations, meets quality gates
- **needs-revision**: Minor issues fixable in place (clarity, missing examples, small gaps)
- **restructure-required**: Collapse detected requiring split, or fundamental type mismatch
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with human judgment at every gate. nWave runs inside Claude Code. It breaks feature delivery into seven waves (discover, diverge, discuss, design, devops, distill, deliver).
Other skills on nwave.
More skills from other plugins.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
ask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Questions about nw-quality-validation.
- Which coding agents can use nw-quality-validation?
- nw-quality-validation installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.

